Suppr超能文献

儿童分泌性中耳炎的抗生素治疗

Antibiotics for otitis media with effusion in children.

作者信息

van Zon Alice, van der Heijden Geert J, van Dongen Thijs M A, Burton Martin J, Schilder Anne G M

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht,Utrecht, Netherlands.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12(9):CD009163. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009163.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Otitis media with effusion (OME) is characterised by an accumulation of fluid in the middle ear behind an intact tympanic membrane, without the symptoms or signs of acute infection. In approximately one in three children with OME, however, a bacterial pathogen is identified in the middle ear fluid. In most cases, OME causes mild hearing impairment of short duration. When experienced in early life and when episodes of (bilateral) OME persist or recur, the associated hearing loss may be significant and have a negative impact on speech development and behaviour. Since most cases of OME will resolve spontaneously, only children with persistent middle ear effusion and associated hearing loss potentially require treatment. Previous Cochrane reviews have focused on the effectiveness of ventilation tube insertion, adenoidectomy, autoinflation, antihistamines, decongestants, and oral and topical intranasal steroids in OME. This review focuses on the effectiveness of antibiotics in children with OME.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of antibiotics in children up to 18 years with OME.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders Group Trials Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); PubMed; EMBASE; CINAHL; Web of Science; BIOSIS Previews; Cambridge Scientific Abstracts; ICTRP and additional sources for published and unpublished trials. The date of the search was 22 February 2012.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing oral antibiotics with placebo, no treatment or therapy of unproven effectiveness. Our primary outcome was complete resolution of OME at two to three months. Secondary outcomes included resolution of OME at other time points, hearing, language and speech, ventilation tube insertion and adverse effects.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data using standardised data extraction forms and assessed the quality of the included studies using the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool. We presented dichotomous results as risk differences as well as risk ratios, with their 95% confidence intervals. If heterogeneity was greater than 75% we did not pool data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 23 studies (3027 children) covering a range of antibiotics, participants, outcome measures and time points of evaluation. Overall, we assessed the studies as generally being at low risk of bias.Our primary outcome was complete resolution of OME at two to three months. The differences (improvement) in the proportion of children having such resolution (risk difference (RD)) in the five individual included studies ranged from 1% (RD 0.01, 95% CI -0.11 to 0.12; not significant) to 45% (RD 0.45, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.65). Results from these studies could not be pooled due to clinical and statistical heterogeneity.Pooled analysis of data for complete resolution at more than six months was possible, with an increase in resolution of 13% (RD 0.13, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.19).Pooled analysis was also possible for complete resolution at the end of treatment, with the following increases in resolution rates: 17% (RD 0.17, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.24) for treatment for 10 days to two weeks, 34% (RD 0.34, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.50) for treatment for four weeks, 32% (RD 0.32, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.47) for treatment for three months, and 14% (RD 0.14, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.24) for treatment continuously for at least six months.We were unable to find evidence of a substantial improvement in hearing as a result of the use of antibiotics for otitis media with effusion; nor did we find an effect on the rate of ventilation tube insertion. We did not identify any trials that looked at speech, language and cognitive development or quality of life. Data on the adverse effects of antibiotic treatment reported in six studies could not be pooled due to high heterogeneity. Increases in the occurrence of adverse events varied from 3% (RD 0.03, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.07; not significant) to 33% (RD 0.33, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.44) in the individual studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The results of our review do not support the routine use of antibiotics for children up to 18 years with otitis media with effusion. The largest effects of antibiotics were seen in children treated continuously for four weeks and three months. Even when clear and relevant benefits of antibiotics have been demonstrated, these must be balanced against the potential adverse effects when making treatment decisions. Immediate adverse effects of antibiotics are common and the emergence of bacterial resistance has been causally linked to the widespread use of antibiotics for common conditions such as otitis media.

摘要

背景

分泌性中耳炎(OME)的特征是在完整鼓膜后的中耳内积液,无急性感染的症状或体征。然而,在大约三分之一患OME的儿童中耳积液中可检测到细菌病原体。在大多数情况下,OME会导致短期的轻度听力损害。如果在儿童早期出现且(双侧)OME发作持续或复发,相关的听力损失可能会很严重,并对言语发育和行为产生负面影响。由于大多数OME病例会自发缓解,因此只有患有持续性中耳积液及相关听力损失的儿童可能需要治疗。之前的Cochrane系统评价聚焦于鼓膜置管、腺样体切除术、自动充气、抗组胺药、减充血剂以及口服和鼻内局部用类固醇治疗OME的有效性。本系统评价聚焦于抗生素治疗患OME儿童的有效性。

目的

评估抗生素对18岁以下患OME儿童的影响。

检索方法

我们检索了Cochrane耳、鼻、喉疾病组试验注册库;Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL);PubMed;EMBASE;CINAHL;科学引文索引;生物学文摘数据库;剑桥科学文摘数据库;国际临床试验注册平台及其他已发表和未发表试验的来源。检索日期为2012年2月22日。

选择标准

比较口服抗生素与安慰剂、不治疗或未经证实有效性治疗的随机对照试验。我们的主要结局是在两至三个月时OME完全缓解。次要结局包括在其他时间点OME的缓解情况、听力、语言和言语、鼓膜置管及不良反应。

数据收集与分析

两位作者使用标准化数据提取表独立提取数据,并使用Cochrane“偏倚风险”工具评估纳入研究的质量。我们将二分法结果表示为风险差异以及风险比,并给出其95%置信区间。如果异质性大于75%,我们不合并数据。

主要结果

我们纳入了23项研究(3027名儿童),涵盖了多种抗生素、参与者、结局指标和评估时间点。总体而言,我们评估这些研究一般偏倚风险较低。我们的主要结局是在两至三个月时OME完全缓解。纳入的五项个体研究中,出现这种缓解的儿童比例差异(改善情况)(风险差异(RD))范围为1%(RD 0.01,95%CI -0.11至0.12;无显著性差异)至45%(RD 0.45, 95%CI 0.25至0.65)。由于临床和统计学异质性,这些研究的结果无法合并。对六个月以上完全缓解的数据进行合并分析是可行的,缓解率增加了13%(RD 0.13,95%CI 0.06至0.19)。对治疗结束时完全缓解的数据也进行了合并分析,缓解率增加情况如下:治疗10天至两周为17%(RD 0.17,95%CI 0.09至0.24),治疗四周为34%(RD 0.34,95%CI 0.19至0.50),治疗三个月为32%(RD 0.32,95%CI 0.17至0.47),持续治疗至少六个月为14%(RD 0.14,95%CI 0.03至0.24)。我们未能找到证据表明使用抗生素治疗分泌性中耳炎能显著改善听力;也未发现其对鼓膜置管率有影响。我们未找到任何研究言语、语言和认知发育或生活质量的试验。六项研究报告的抗生素治疗不良反应数据因异质性高无法合并。各研究中不良事件发生率的增加范围为3%(RD 0.03,95%CI -0.01至0.07;无显著性差异)至33%(RD 0.33,95%CI 0.22至0.44)。

作者结论

我们的系统评价结果不支持对18岁以下患分泌性中耳炎的儿童常规使用抗生素。抗生素治疗效果最明显的是持续治疗四周和三个月的儿童。即使已证明抗生素有明确且相关的益处,但在做出治疗决策时,必须将这些益处与潜在的不良反应相权衡。抗生素的直接不良反应很常见,且细菌耐药性的出现与抗生素在诸如中耳炎等常见疾病中的广泛使用存在因果关系。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验