Kannus P, Järvinen M
Tampere Research Station of Sports Medicine, Finland.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1990 Jan;71(1):38-41.
This study evaluated the peak torque and total work hamstring/quadriceps (HQ) ratios of 77 knees with a previous grade I distortion injury to find the possible relationship between different HQ ratios and long-term outcome. For measurement of quadriceps and hamstrings strengths, the CYBEX II isokinetic dynamometer was used. Peak torque values were recorded at low (60 degrees/sec) and high (180 degrees/sec) speeds of isokinetic movement, and the maximal isometric extension and flexion outputs were measured with the knee at a 60 degree angle. Three standardized knee scoring scales were used to determine the subjective, functional, clinical, and radiologic outcome of the injured knees. In every test, great intersubject variation of the HQ ratio was observed, even in healthy knees (range 19% to 148%). Follow-up scores of the groups with low (less than 50%), optimal (50% to 80%), or high (greater than 80%) HQ ratios of the injured knees did not differ significantly from each other. However, in every test the scores were significantly (p less than 0.001 to less than 0.0001) better in patients whose injured knee HQ ratio was nearly identical (less than or equal to 15%) rather than clearly different from (greater than 15%) the uninjured knee. These findings confirm our previous observation that the HQ ratio is an idiosyncratic parameter. Any general recommendation about optimal value is difficult to give. In evaluating long-term outcome, the most ideal HQ ratio of an injured knee seems to be the HQ ratio of the opposite, healthy extremity.
本研究评估了77例曾有I级扭伤损伤的膝关节的峰值扭矩以及腘绳肌/股四头肌(HQ)比率,以探寻不同HQ比率与长期预后之间的可能关系。为测量股四头肌和腘绳肌力量,使用了CYBEX II等速测力计。在等速运动的低(60度/秒)、高(180度/秒)速度下记录峰值扭矩值,并在膝关节处于60度角时测量最大等长伸展和屈曲输出。使用三种标准化的膝关节评分量表来确定受伤膝关节的主观、功能、临床和放射学预后。在每项测试中,即使在健康膝关节中也观察到HQ比率存在很大的个体间差异(范围为19%至148%)。受伤膝关节HQ比率低(小于50%)、最佳(50%至80%)或高(大于80%)的组的随访评分彼此之间无显著差异。然而,在每项测试中,受伤膝关节HQ比率与未受伤膝关节几乎相同(小于或等于15%)而非明显不同(大于15%)的患者的评分显著更好(p小于0.001至小于0.0001)。这些发现证实了我们之前的观察结果,即HQ比率是一个因人而异的参数。很难给出关于最佳值的任何一般性建议。在评估长期预后时,受伤膝关节最理想的HQ比率似乎是对侧健康肢体的HQ比率。