Kos Miriam, van den Brink Danielle, Hagoort Peter
Radboud University Nijmegen, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Front Psychol. 2012 Sep 6;3:318. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00318. eCollection 2012.
It is well-known that, within ERP paradigms of sentence processing, semantically anomalous words elicit N400 effects. Less clear, however, is what happens after the N400. In some cases N400 effects are followed by Late Positive Complexes (LPC), whereas in other cases such effects are lacking. We investigated several factors which could affect the LPC, such as contextual constraint, inter-individual variation, and working memory. Seventy-two participants read sentences containing a semantic manipulation (Whipped cream tastes sweet/anxious and creamy). Neither contextual constraint nor working memory correlated with the LPC. Inter-individual variation played a substantial role in the elicitation of the LPC with about half of the participants showing a negative response and the other half showing an LPC. This individual variation correlated with a syntactic ERP as well as an alternative semantic manipulation. In conclusion, our results show that inter-individual variation plays a large role in the elicitation of the LPC and this may account for the diversity in LPC findings in language research.
众所周知,在句子处理的事件相关电位(ERP)范式中,语义异常的词会引发N400效应。然而,N400之后会发生什么却不太清楚。在某些情况下,N400效应之后会出现晚期正复合波(LPC),而在其他情况下则没有这种效应。我们研究了几个可能影响LPC的因素,如语境约束、个体差异和工作记忆。72名参与者阅读了包含语义操纵的句子(鲜奶油尝起来甜/焦虑且奶油状)。语境约束和工作记忆与LPC均无相关性。个体差异在LPC的诱发中起了很大作用,约一半的参与者表现出负反应,另一半则表现出LPC。这种个体差异与句法ERP以及另一种语义操纵相关。总之,我们的结果表明个体差异在LPC的诱发中起很大作用,这可能解释了语言研究中LPC研究结果的多样性。