• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

辨别大脑中的句法操作:依存句法分析和短语结构句法分析

Distinguishing Syntactic Operations in the Brain: Dependency and Phrase-Structure Parsing.

作者信息

Lopopolo Alessandro, van den Bosch Antal, Petersson Karl-Magnus, Willems Roel M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Potsdam, Germany.

Center for Language Studies, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

出版信息

Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2021 Feb 1;2(1):152-175. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00029. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1162/nol_a_00029
PMID:37213416
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10174354/
Abstract

Finding the structure of a sentence-the way its words hold together to convey meaning-is a fundamental step in language comprehension. Several brain regions, including the left inferior frontal gyrus, the left posterior superior temporal gyrus, and the left anterior temporal pole, are supposed to support this operation. The exact role of these areas is nonetheless still debated. In this paper we investigate the hypothesis that different brain regions could be sensitive to different kinds of syntactic computations. We compare the fit of phrase-structure and dependency structure descriptors to activity in brain areas using fMRI. Our results show a division between areas with regard to the type of structure computed, with the left anterior temporal pole and left inferior frontal gyrus favouring dependency structures and left posterior superior temporal gyrus favouring phrase structures.

摘要

找出句子的结构——即其词语组合在一起以传达意义的方式——是语言理解的一个基本步骤。包括左下额回、左后颞上回和左前颞极在内的几个脑区被认为支持这一操作。然而,这些区域的确切作用仍存在争议。在本文中,我们研究了不同脑区可能对不同类型的句法计算敏感这一假设。我们使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)比较了短语结构和依存结构描述符与脑区活动的拟合情况。我们的结果显示,不同脑区在计算的结构类型方面存在分工,左前颞极和左下额回更倾向于依存结构,而左后颞上回更倾向于短语结构。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64f3/10174354/30c9d1a3c4ef/nol-2-1-152-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64f3/10174354/0b00f8aae2a6/nol-2-1-152-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64f3/10174354/07b94a793ede/nol-2-1-152-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64f3/10174354/ea9c34f1f562/nol-2-1-152-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64f3/10174354/719c7699a465/nol-2-1-152-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64f3/10174354/c830c757b792/nol-2-1-152-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64f3/10174354/17957b83374d/nol-2-1-152-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64f3/10174354/30c9d1a3c4ef/nol-2-1-152-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64f3/10174354/0b00f8aae2a6/nol-2-1-152-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64f3/10174354/07b94a793ede/nol-2-1-152-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64f3/10174354/ea9c34f1f562/nol-2-1-152-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64f3/10174354/719c7699a465/nol-2-1-152-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64f3/10174354/c830c757b792/nol-2-1-152-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64f3/10174354/17957b83374d/nol-2-1-152-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64f3/10174354/30c9d1a3c4ef/nol-2-1-152-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Distinguishing Syntactic Operations in the Brain: Dependency and Phrase-Structure Parsing.辨别大脑中的句法操作:依存句法分析和短语结构句法分析
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2021 Feb 1;2(1):152-175. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00029. eCollection 2021.
2
Left inferior frontal cortex and syntax: function, structure and behaviour in patients with left hemisphere damage.左侧额下回与句法:左侧大脑半球损伤患者的功能、结构和行为。
Brain. 2011 Feb;134(Pt 2):415-31. doi: 10.1093/brain/awq369.
3
The role of the IFG and pSTS in syntactic prediction: Evidence from a parametric study of hierarchical structure in fMRI.中间前回和颞上沟后部在句法预测中的作用:来自功能磁共振成像中层次结构参数研究的证据。
Cortex. 2017 Mar;88:106-123. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.12.010. Epub 2016 Dec 18.
4
What role does the anterior temporal lobe play in sentence-level processing? Neural correlates of syntactic processing in semantic variant primary progressive aphasia.前部颞叶在句子层面的处理中扮演什么角色?语义变异原发性进行性失语症中句法处理的神经相关物。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 May;26(5):970-85. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00550. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
5
Neurophysiological dynamics of phrase-structure building during sentence processing.句子处理过程中短语结构构建的神经生理动力学
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 May 2;114(18):E3669-E3678. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1701590114. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
6
Recursive hierarchical embedding in vision is impaired by posterior middle temporal gyrus lesions.后颞中回损伤导致视觉中的递归层次嵌入受损。
Brain. 2019 Oct 1;142(10):3217-3229. doi: 10.1093/brain/awz242.
7
Independent syntactic representation identified in left front-temporal cortex during Chinese sentence comprehension.左额下回在汉语句子理解过程中表现出独立的句法表征。
Brain Lang. 2021 Mar;214:104907. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2021.104907. Epub 2021 Jan 24.
8
The role of left inferior frontal and superior temporal cortex in sentence comprehension: localizing syntactic and semantic processes.左额下回和颞上回在句子理解中的作用:句法和语义加工的定位
Cereb Cortex. 2003 Feb;13(2):170-7. doi: 10.1093/cercor/13.2.170.
9
The role of left temporo-parietal and inferior frontal cortex in comprehending syntactically complex sentences: A brain stimulation study.左颞顶叶和额下回皮质在理解句法复杂句子中的作用:一项脑刺激研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2023 Feb 10;180:108465. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108465. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
10
Syntactic structure building in the anterior temporal lobe during natural story listening.自然故事聆听过程中前颞叶的句法结构构建。
Brain Lang. 2012 Feb;120(2):163-73. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2010.04.002. Epub 2010 May 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Language-specific neural dynamics extend syntax into the time domain.特定语言的神经动力学将句法扩展到时域。
PLoS Biol. 2025 Jan 21;23(1):e3002968. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002968. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Localizing Syntactic Composition with Left-Corner Recurrent Neural Network Grammars.使用左角递归神经网络语法对句法结构进行定位
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2024 Apr 1;5(1):201-224. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00118. eCollection 2024.
3
Diverging neural dynamics for syntactic structure building in naturalistic speaking and listening.

本文引用的文献

1
Using stochastic language models (SLM) to map lexical, syntactic, and phonological information processing in the brain.使用随机语言模型(SLM)来绘制大脑中词汇、句法和语音信息处理过程。
PLoS One. 2017 May 18;12(5):e0177794. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177794. eCollection 2017.
2
Neurophysiological dynamics of phrase-structure building during sentence processing.句子处理过程中短语结构构建的神经生理动力学
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 May 2;114(18):E3669-E3678. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1701590114. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
3
The role of the IFG and pSTS in syntactic prediction: Evidence from a parametric study of hierarchical structure in fMRI.
自然语言听说中句法结构构建的神经动力学差异。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Mar 12;121(11):e2310766121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2310766121. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
4
Supramodal Sentence Processing in the Human Brain: fMRI Evidence for the Influence of Syntactic Complexity in More Than 200 Participants.人类大脑中的跨模态句子处理:超过200名参与者的功能磁共振成像证据表明句法复杂性的影响
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2022 Sep 29;3(4):575-598. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00076. eCollection 2022.
5
Spatiotemporally distributed frontotemporal networks for sentence reading.句子阅读的时空分布额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额额,我今天收到了一条短信,说我的征信有问题,说我中了一个奖,要我汇钱过去,这是真的吗?
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Apr 25;120(17):e2300252120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2300252120. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
6
Modulation in alpha band activity reflects syntax composition: an MEG study of minimal syntactic binding.alpha 频段活动的调制反映了句法构成:最小句法绑定的 MEG 研究。
Cereb Cortex. 2023 Jan 5;33(3):497-511. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhac080.
7
Minimal Phrase Composition Revealed by Intracranial Recordings.颅内记录揭示的最小词组构成。
J Neurosci. 2022 Apr 13;42(15):3216-3227. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1575-21.2022. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
中间前回和颞上沟后部在句法预测中的作用:来自功能磁共振成像中层次结构参数研究的证据。
Cortex. 2017 Mar;88:106-123. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.12.010. Epub 2016 Dec 18.
4
Abstract linguistic structure correlates with temporal activity during naturalistic comprehension.摘要:语言结构与自然语言理解过程中的时间活动相关。
Brain Lang. 2016 Jun-Jul;157-158:81-94. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2016.04.008. Epub 2016 May 19.
5
The hierarchical organization of the lateral prefrontal cortex.外侧前额叶皮层的分层组织。
Elife. 2016 Mar 21;5:e12112. doi: 10.7554/eLife.12112.
6
Merge in the Human Brain: A Sub-Region Based Functional Investigation in the Left Pars Opercularis.人类大脑中的融合:基于左额下回岛盖部亚区域的功能研究
Front Psychol. 2015 Nov 27;6:1818. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01818. eCollection 2015.
7
Building by Syntax: The Neural Basis of Minimal Linguistic Structures.句法构建:最小语言结构的神经基础
Cereb Cortex. 2017 Jan 1;27(1):411-421. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhv234.
8
Prediction During Natural Language Comprehension.自然语言理解中的预测
Cereb Cortex. 2016 Jun;26(6):2506-2516. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhv075. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
9
The LATL as locus of composition: MEG evidence from English and Arabic.作为创作场所的左颞叶前部语言区:来自英语和阿拉伯语的脑磁图证据。
Brain Lang. 2015 Feb;141:124-34. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.12.003. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
10
The cognitive neuroscience of working memory.工作记忆的认知神经科学
Annu Rev Psychol. 2015 Jan 3;66:115-42. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015031. Epub 2014 Sep 19.