• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德菲尔研究构建适用于工作场所评估的基于能力本位的 CanMEDS 量表。

A Delphi study to construct a CanMEDS competence based inventory applicable for workplace assessment.

机构信息

Skills Lab, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Campus Drie Eiken, Antwerp 2610, Belgium.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2012 Sep 14;12:86. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-86.

DOI:10.1186/1472-6920-12-86
PMID:22973829
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3599737/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

During workplace based learning students develop professional competences and an appropriate performance. To gain insight in the learning process and to evaluate competences and performance, assessment tools are essential and need to be of good quality. We aimed to construct a competence inventory applicable as an instrument to measure the content validity of workplace based assessment tools, such as portfolio.

METHODS

A Delphi study was carried out based on the CanMEDS Roles Framework. In three rounds, experts (N = 25-30) were invited to score the key competences per CanMEDS role on relevance (6-point Likert-scale), and to comment on the content and formulation bearing in mind its use in workplace based assessment. A descriptive analysis of relevances and comments was performed.

RESULTS

Although all competences were scored as relevant, many comments pointed at a lack of concrete, transparent and applicable descriptions of the key competences for the purpose of assessment. Therefore, the CanMEDS roles were reformulated in this Delphi procedure as concrete learning outcomes, observable and suitable for workplace based assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

A competence based inventory, ready for validating workplace based assessment tools, was constructed using a Delphi procedure and based on a clarification and concretisation of the CanMEDS roles.

摘要

背景

在工作场所学习期间,学生发展专业能力和适当的表现。为了深入了解学习过程并评估能力和表现,评估工具是必不可少的,并且需要具有良好的质量。我们旨在构建一个能力清单,可用作衡量基于工作场所的评估工具(如组合)的内容有效性的工具。

方法

基于加拿大医学教育多维基准(CanMEDS)角色框架进行了一项德尔菲研究。在三轮中,邀请专家(N=25-30)根据 CanMEDS 角色对每项关键能力进行相关性评分(6 点李克特量表),并考虑到其在基于工作场所的评估中的用途,对内容和表述进行评论。对相关性和评论进行了描述性分析。

结果

尽管所有能力都被评为相关,但许多评论指出,为了评估的目的,关键能力的具体、透明和适用描述缺乏。因此,在这个德尔菲程序中,CanMEDS 角色被重新表述为具体的学习成果,可观察且适合基于工作场所的评估。

结论

使用德尔菲程序并基于对 CanMEDS 角色的澄清和具体化,构建了一个基于能力的清单,可用于验证基于工作场所的评估工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11f0/3599737/42d502547477/1472-6920-12-86-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11f0/3599737/42d502547477/1472-6920-12-86-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11f0/3599737/42d502547477/1472-6920-12-86-1.jpg

相似文献

1
A Delphi study to construct a CanMEDS competence based inventory applicable for workplace assessment.德菲尔研究构建适用于工作场所评估的基于能力本位的 CanMEDS 量表。
BMC Med Educ. 2012 Sep 14;12:86. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-86.
2
Fitness-for-purpose of the CanMEDS competencies for workplace-based assessment in General Practitioner's Training: a Delphi study.以目的为导向的 CanMEDS 医师能力评估在全科医生培训中的应用:一项德尔菲研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Apr 1;23(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04207-2.
3
Content validity of workplace-based portfolios: A multi-centre study.基于工作场所的档案袋的内容效度:一项多中心研究。
Med Teach. 2016 Sep;38(9):936-45. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1132407. Epub 2016 Jan 30.
4
An online Delphi study to investigate the completeness of the CanMEDS Roles and the relevance, formulation, and measurability of their key competencies within eight healthcare disciplines in Flanders.一项在线德尔菲研究,旨在调查 CanMEDS 角色在佛兰德八个医疗保健学科中的完整性,以及其关键能力的相关性、表述和可衡量性。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Apr 10;22(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03308-8.
5
A Delphi study to validate competency-based criteria to assess undergraduate midwifery students' competencies in the maternity ward.一项德尔菲研究,旨在验证基于能力的标准,以评估本科助产专业学生在产科病房的能力。
Midwifery. 2017 Oct;53:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
6
The Minimum Competences in Non-surgical Oncology that Medical Students Need to Acquire in Order to be Safe Foundation Year 1 (F1) Doctors: A Delphi Survey.医学生为成为安全的第一年基础培训医生(F1)所需掌握的非手术肿瘤学最低能力:一项德尔菲调查。
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2015 Jul;27(7):373-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2015.03.007. Epub 2015 Apr 13.
7
A core undergraduate curriculum in plastic surgery - a Delphi consensus study in Scandinavia.整形外科学本科核心课程——斯堪的纳维亚地区的德尔菲共识研究
J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2018 Apr;52(2):97-105. doi: 10.1080/2000656X.2017.1343190. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
8
Assessment of Competence in EVAR Procedures: A Novel Rating Scale Developed by the Delphi Technique.腔内血管修复术(EVAR)操作能力评估:一种通过德尔菲技术开发的新型评分量表。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017 Jul;54(1):34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.04.001. Epub 2017 May 23.
9
Workplace-Based Assessments Using Pediatric Critical Care Entrustable Professional Activities.使用儿科重症监护可托付专业活动进行基于工作场所的评估。
J Grad Med Educ. 2019 Aug;11(4):430-438. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-18-01006.1.
10
Evaluation and feedback for effective clinical teaching in postgraduate medical education: validation of an assessment instrument incorporating the CanMEDS roles.研究生医学教育中有效临床教学的评估和反馈:纳入 CanMEDS 角色的评估工具的验证。
Med Teach. 2012;34(11):893-901. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.699114. Epub 2012 Jul 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Learning Outputs for Peer Teachers in Undergraduate Medical Education.本科医学教育中同伴教师的学习成果。
Med Sci Educ. 2025 Mar 22;35(3):1617-1626. doi: 10.1007/s40670-025-02365-0. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
How can peer teaching influence the development of medical students? a descriptive, longitudinal interview study.同伴教学如何影响医学生的发展?一项描述性、纵向访谈研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Nov 13;23(1):861. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04801-4.
3
Development of individual competencies and team performance in interprofessional ward rounds: results of a study with multimodal observations at the Heidelberg Interprofessional Training Ward.

本文引用的文献

1
CanMEDS 2000: Extract from the CanMEDS 2000 Project Societal Needs Working Group Report.《加拿大医学教育标准 2000》:摘自《加拿大医学教育标准 2000》项目社会需求工作组报告。
Med Teach. 2000;22(6):549-54. doi: 10.1080/01421590050175505.
2
The effects of performance-based assessment criteria on student performance and self-assessment skills.基于绩效的评估标准对学生表现和自我评价技能的影响。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2010 Oct;15(4):517-32. doi: 10.1007/s10459-009-9215-x. Epub 2010 Jan 7.
3
Portfolio assessment during medical internships: How to obtain a reliable and feasible assessment procedure?
跨专业病房查房中个人能力发展与团队绩效:海德堡跨专业培训病房多模式观察研究结果
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Sep 27;10:1241557. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1241557. eCollection 2023.
4
When theory beats practice: the implementation of competency-based education at healthcare workplaces : Focus group interviews with students, mentors, and educators of six healthcare disciplines.当理论战胜实践:以医疗保健工作场所为基础的能力教育的实施:对六个医疗保健学科的学生、导师和教育者进行焦点小组访谈。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jun 29;23(1):484. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04446-3.
5
Fitness-for-purpose of the CanMEDS competencies for workplace-based assessment in General Practitioner's Training: a Delphi study.以目的为导向的 CanMEDS 医师能力评估在全科医生培训中的应用:一项德尔菲研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Apr 1;23(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04207-2.
6
Health Service Management and Patient Safety in Primary Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Kosovo.科索沃 COVID-19 大流行期间初级保健中的卫生服务管理和患者安全。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 20;20(4):3768. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043768.
7
Does peer teaching improve academic results and competencies during medical school? A mixed methods study.同伴教学是否能提高医学生的学业成绩和能力?一项混合方法研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jun 4;22(1):431. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03507-3.
8
An online Delphi study to investigate the completeness of the CanMEDS Roles and the relevance, formulation, and measurability of their key competencies within eight healthcare disciplines in Flanders.一项在线德尔菲研究,旨在调查 CanMEDS 角色在佛兰德八个医疗保健学科中的完整性,以及其关键能力的相关性、表述和可衡量性。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Apr 10;22(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03308-8.
9
A new instrument to measure high value, cost-conscious care attitudes among healthcare stakeholders: development of the MHAQ.一种新的工具,用于衡量医疗保健利益相关者的高价值、成本意识的护理态度:MHAQ 的开发。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Mar 2;20(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4979-z.
10
Medical students' experiences of their own professional development during three clinical terms: a prospective follow-up study.医学生在三个临床学期中自身专业发展的经历:一项前瞻性随访研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Feb 27;17(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0886-3.
医学实习期间的档案袋评估:如何获得可靠且可行的评估程序?
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2009 Dec;22(3):313. Epub 2009 Dec 8.
4
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
5
The effectiveness of portfolios for post-graduate assessment and education: BEME Guide No 12.研究生评估与教育组合的有效性:BEME指南第12号
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):299-318. doi: 10.1080/01421590902883056.
6
Measurement of the general competencies of the accreditation council for graduate medical education: a systematic review.研究生医学教育认证委员会通用能力的测量:一项系统评价。
Acad Med. 2009 Mar;84(3):301-9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181971f08.
7
CanMEDS evaluation in Canadian postgraduate training programmes: tools used and programme director satisfaction.加拿大研究生培训项目中的CanMEDS评估:所使用的工具及项目主任满意度
Med Educ. 2008 Sep;42(9):879-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03111.x.
8
The ACGME outcome project: retrospective and prospective.美国毕业后医学教育认证委员会成果项目:回顾与展望
Med Teach. 2007 Sep;29(7):648-54. doi: 10.1080/01421590701392903.
9
The CanMEDS initiative: implementing an outcomes-based framework of physician competencies.加拿大医学教育方向与角色(CanMEDS)倡议:实施基于结果的医生能力框架。
Med Teach. 2007 Sep;29(7):642-7. doi: 10.1080/01421590701746983.
10
Portfolios in medical education: why do they meet with mixed success? A systematic review.医学教育中的档案袋:为何它们的成效参差不齐?一项系统综述。
Med Educ. 2007 Dec;41(12):1224-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02944.x.