Faculty of Engineeríng, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, Mexico.
Int J Hyperthermia. 2012;28(7):653-62. doi: 10.3109/02656736.2012.711894. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
The Cool-tip electrode is one of the most widely employed applicators in radiofrequency (RF) hepatic ablation. Previous research demonstrated that it is possible to enlarge coagulation volume when the single cooled electrode is associated with distant infusion of saline (hybrid applicator). The aim of this study was to compare the electrical-thermal behaviour of the Cool-tip electrode with that of the hybrid applicator.
Forty-two RF ablations were performed on a total of 10 pigs: 22 with the Cool-tip electrode and 20 with the hybrid applicator (low infused saline volumetric flow rate of 6 mL/h at 2 mm distance). We compared both electrical performance (delivered power and number of roll-offs, i.e. sudden rises in impedance that interrupt the power delivery) and coagulation zone characteristics. In addition, we built a one-dimensional model to provide a basic physical explanation of the difference in performance between the different applicators.
The experimental results showed that the number of roll-offs with the Cool-tip electrode was higher (24.3 ± 3.1 versus 6.7 ± 7.0). The hybrid applicator created larger coagulation volumes (19.7 ± 9.5 cm(3) versus 9.5 ± 5.8 cm(3)) with larger transverse diameters (2.5 ± 0.6 versus 1.9 ± 0.5 cm). The one-dimensional model confirmed the delay in the incidence of the first roll-off, but not the heterogeneity of the hybrid applicator's electrical performance in the experiments.
The hybrid applicator produces fewer roll-off episodes than the Cool-tip electrode and creates larger coagulation volumes with larger transverse diameters.
冷尖端电极是射频(RF)肝消融中应用最广泛的电极之一。先前的研究表明,当单冷电极与远处输注盐水(混合电极)联合使用时,可以扩大凝固体积。本研究旨在比较冷尖端电极与混合电极的电热行为。
对总共 10 头猪进行了 42 次 RF 消融:22 次使用冷尖端电极,20 次使用混合电极(低灌注盐水体积流速为 6mL/h,距离为 2mm)。我们比较了两种电极的电性能(输送功率和 roll-offs 数量,即阻抗突然升高导致功率输送中断)和凝固区特征。此外,我们建立了一个一维模型,为不同电极之间性能差异提供了基本的物理解释。
实验结果表明,冷尖端电极的 roll-offs 数量更高(24.3±3.1 次比 6.7±7.0 次)。混合电极产生的凝固体积更大(19.7±9.5cm³比 9.5±5.8cm³),横向直径也更大(2.5±0.6cm 比 1.9±0.5cm)。一维模型证实了第一次 roll-offs 发生的延迟,但不能解释混合电极在实验中的电性能异质性。
混合电极比冷尖端电极产生的 roll-offs 次数更少,产生的凝固体积更大,横向直径也更大。