To Carol K S, Law Thomas, Cheung Pamela S P
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012 Oct;14(5):462-6. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2012.688867.
Much evidence supports the efficacy of different treatment approaches for speech sound disorders (SSD) in children. Minimal research in the field has been conducted using treatment intensity as a research variable. This study examined the current practice of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) in Hong Kong regarding the treatment intensity prescribed to children with SSD and potential factors that were associated with the intensity. Participants were 102 SLPs working in different settings in Hong Kong who completed an online questionnaire. SLPs who had a heavier caseload offered significantly less frequent and shorter treatment duration to clients with SSD. Public and private settings differed significantly in treatment duration. Treatment approaches and clinicians' consideration about a client's conditions did not affect treatment intensity. SLPs in Hong Kong do not plan treatment duration and frequency in an evidence-based direction because of their heavy workloads and the dearth of research evidence on treatment intensity to guide their clinical practice.
许多证据支持不同治疗方法对儿童语音障碍(SSD)的疗效。该领域中以治疗强度作为研究变量的研究极少。本研究调查了香港言语治疗师(SLP)针对SSD儿童规定的治疗强度的当前做法以及与该强度相关的潜在因素。参与者为102名在香港不同机构工作的SLP,他们完成了一份在线问卷。工作量较大的SLP为SSD客户提供的治疗频率显著较低,治疗时长也较短。公立和私立机构在治疗时长上存在显著差异。治疗方法以及临床医生对客户状况的考量并未影响治疗强度。由于工作量繁重且缺乏关于治疗强度的研究证据来指导临床实践,香港的SLP并未按照循证的方向规划治疗时长和频率。