Schmitt Mary Beth, Justice Laura M
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012 Oct;14(5):451-5. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2012.687057. Epub 2012 Jun 19.
In response to Baker (2012) unpacking critical components of optimal intervention intensity, this article explores what is currently known regarding intervention intensity for emergent literacy for children at risk for delays in this area of development. Studies specifically addressing intervention intensity related to phonological awareness and print knowledge suggest that more intensity does not always yield better results, and other factors suggested by Baker may influence the impact of intensity on children's outcomes. However, none of the research to date includes speech-language pathologists or children with diagnosed language disorders in the intervention models. Future research involving large-scale, systematic focus on intervention intensity in emergent literacy for children at risk for future reading disorders is needed to fully understand this construct within speech-language pathology services.
为回应贝克(2012年)对最佳干预强度关键组成部分的剖析,本文探讨了目前已知的关于针对在这一发展领域有延迟风险的儿童进行早期读写能力干预强度的情况。专门针对与语音意识和印刷知识相关的干预强度的研究表明,强度越高并不总是能产生更好的效果,而且贝克提出的其他因素可能会影响强度对儿童成果的影响。然而,迄今为止的所有研究在干预模型中都未纳入言语语言病理学家或被诊断患有语言障碍的儿童。未来需要开展大规模、系统性地聚焦于有未来阅读障碍风险儿童早期读写能力干预强度的研究,以便在言语语言病理学服务中全面理解这一概念。