Williams A Lynn
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012 Oct;14(5):456-61. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2012.688866. Epub 2012 Jun 11.
Despite a number of studies that have demonstrated positive outcomes for inducing clinical change in children with speech sound disorders (SSD), there is a need to address the question of whether resources are being applied in an optimal manner. As a consequence, there has been a call to look within interventions to examine parameters that may contribute to intervention outcomes; specifically the intensity of intervention (dose, frequency, duration, and cumulative intervention intensity). In this paper, empirical evidence from three intervention studies using multiple oppositions primarily, and a second contrastive approach, minimal pairs, is reported with regard to the parameters of intervention intensity. The findings indicated that greater intensity yields greater treatment outcomes. Further, quantitative and qualitative changes in intensity occur as intervention progresses, and there were differences in intensity based on severity of the SSD. Based on these data, suggestions were made toward establishing some prescribed amounts of intensity to affect treatment outcomes for children with SSD.
尽管多项研究已证明对患有语音障碍(SSD)的儿童进行临床干预能产生积极效果,但仍有必要探讨资源是否得到了最优利用。因此,有人呼吁深入研究干预措施,以考察可能影响干预效果的参数;特别是干预强度(剂量、频率、持续时间和累积干预强度)。本文报告了三项主要使用多重对立以及第二种对比方法——最小对立体——的干预研究中关于干预强度参数的实证证据。研究结果表明,强度越大,治疗效果越好。此外,随着干预的推进,强度会发生定量和定性的变化,并且根据SSD的严重程度,强度也存在差异。基于这些数据,针对确定一些规定的强度量以影响SSD儿童的治疗效果提出了建议。