• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于肿瘤科住院患者的自我报告床边疼痛评估工具的效果。

The effectiveness of a self-reporting bedside pain assessment tool for oncology inpatients.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, South Korea.

出版信息

J Palliat Med. 2012 Nov;15(11):1222-33. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2012.0183. Epub 2012 Sep 13.

DOI:10.1089/jpm.2012.0183
PMID:22974435
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3482846/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pain is common during cancer treatment, and patient self-reporting of pain is an essential first step for ideal cancer pain management. However, many studies on cancer pain management report that, because pain may be underestimated, it is often inadequately managed.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of bedside self-assessment of pain intensity for inpatients using a self-reporting pain board.

METHODS

Fifty consecutive inpatients admitted to the Oncology Department of Chungbuk National University Hospital were included in this observational prospective study from February 2011 to December 2011. The medical staff performed pain assessments by asking patients questions and using verbal rated scales (VRS) over 3 consecutive days. Then, for 3 additional days, patients used a self-reporting pain board attached to the bed, which had movable indicators representing 0-10 on a numeric rating scale (NRS) and the frequency of breakthrough pain.

RESULTS

Patient reliability over the medical staff's pain assessment increased from 74% to 96% after applying the self-reporting pain board (p=0.004). The gap (mean±standard deviation [SD]) between the NRS reported by patients and the NRS recorded on the medical records decreased from 3.16±2.08 to 1.00±1.02 (p<0.001), and the level of patient satisfaction with pain management increased from 54% to 82% (p=0.002).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the self-reporting bedside pain assessment tool provides a reliable and effective means of assessing pain in oncology inpatients.

摘要

背景

疼痛在癌症治疗过程中很常见,患者对疼痛的自我报告是理想的癌症疼痛管理的第一步。然而,许多癌症疼痛管理的研究报告称,由于疼痛可能被低估,因此往往管理不足。

目的

本研究旨在评估使用自我报告疼痛板对住院患者进行床边自我评估疼痛强度的效果。

方法

2011 年 2 月至 2011 年 12 月,我们对连续入住忠北国立大学医院肿瘤内科的 50 例住院患者进行了这项观察性前瞻性研究。医务人员在连续 3 天通过询问患者问题并使用口头评定量表(VRS)进行疼痛评估。然后,在接下来的 3 天,患者使用附在床旁的自我报告疼痛板,该板上有表示数字评定量表(NRS)0-10 的可移动指标和爆发性疼痛的频率。

结果

使用自我报告疼痛板后,患者对医务人员疼痛评估的可靠性从 74%提高到 96%(p=0.004)。患者报告的 NRS 与病历记录的 NRS 之间的差距(平均值±标准偏差 [SD])从 3.16±2.08 降至 1.00±1.02(p<0.001),患者对疼痛管理的满意度从 54%提高到 82%(p=0.002)。

结论

本研究表明,床边自我报告疼痛评估工具为评估肿瘤内科住院患者的疼痛提供了一种可靠有效的方法。

相似文献

1
The effectiveness of a self-reporting bedside pain assessment tool for oncology inpatients.一种用于肿瘤科住院患者的自我报告床边疼痛评估工具的效果。
J Palliat Med. 2012 Nov;15(11):1222-33. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2012.0183. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
2
A satisfaction survey on cancer pain management using a self-reporting pain assessment tool.一项使用自我报告疼痛评估工具对癌症疼痛管理进行的满意度调查。
J Palliat Med. 2015 Mar;18(3):225-31. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2014.0021. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
3
Comparative evaluations of single-item pain-intensity measures in cancer patients: Numeric rating scale vs. verbal rating scale.癌症患者单项疼痛强度测量的比较评估:数字评定量表与言语评定量表。
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Aug;29(15-16):2945-2952. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15341. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
4
Comparative study of verbal rating scale and numerical rating scale to assess postoperative pain intensity in the post anesthesia care unit: A prospective observational cohort study.比较语言评定量表和数字评定量表评估麻醉后护理单元术后疼痛强度的研究:一项前瞻性观察队列研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Feb 12;100(6):e24314. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024314.
5
Comparison of numerical and verbal rating scales to measure pain exacerbations in patients with chronic cancer pain.比较数字和口头评分量表,以衡量慢性癌痛患者的疼痛加重情况。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010 Apr 22;8:42. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-42.
6
Evaluation of Pain Intensity Assessment Tools Among Elderly Patients With Cancer in Taiwan.台湾老年癌症患者疼痛强度评估工具的评估
Cancer Nurs. 2017 Jul/Aug;40(4):269-275. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000410.
7
Pain Intensity Scales Comparison in Patient with Abdominal Pain.腹痛患者疼痛强度量表的比较
Psychiatr Danub. 2017 Dec;29 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):845-850.
8
The verbal numeric pain scale: effects of patient education on self-reports of pain.语言数字疼痛量表:患者教育对疼痛自我报告的影响。
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Aug;13(8):853-9. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.04.020.
9
Psychometric properties of the pain assessment in advanced dementia scale compared to self assessment of pain in elderly patients.疼痛评估在高级痴呆症量表中的心理测量特性与老年患者自我评估疼痛的比较。
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2012;34(1):38-43. doi: 10.1159/000341582. Epub 2012 Aug 15.
10
Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review.比较数字评分量表、语言评分量表和视觉模拟量表评估成人疼痛强度的研究:系统文献回顾。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Jun;41(6):1073-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.08.016.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-reported pain severity is associated with shorter survival in older adults with newly diagnosed cancer.患者报告的疼痛严重程度与新诊断癌症的老年人较短的生存期相关。
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Jul 26;33(8):722. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09779-x.
2
The IPA, a Modified Numerical System for Pain Assessment and Intervention.IPA,一种用于疼痛评估和干预的改良数值系统。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2021 Sep 2;5(9):e21.00174. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00174.
3
Differences in nurses’ perceptions of self-reported pain and the administered morphine dose according to the patient’s facial expression in Korea.韩国护士对患者面部表情所表现出的疼痛感知与实际给予的吗啡剂量的感知差异。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2020;17:38. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.38. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
4
A pilot study of improved psychological distress with art therapy in patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy.一项关于艺术治疗改善癌症化疗患者心理困扰的初步研究。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Sep 22;20(1):899. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07380-5.
5
Patient reported postoperative pain with a smartphone application: A proof of concept.患者使用智能手机应用报告术后疼痛:概念验证。
PLoS One. 2020 May 8;15(5):e0232082. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232082. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Medical oncologists' attitudes and practice in cancer pain management: a national survey.医学肿瘤学家在癌症疼痛管理方面的态度和实践:一项全国性调查。
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Dec 20;29(36):4769-75. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.35.0561. Epub 2011 Nov 14.
2
Cancer pain management-current status.癌症疼痛管理——现状
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Apr;27(2):162-8. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.81820.
3
The measurement of pain.疼痛的测量。
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2011 Aug;23(6):381-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2011.04.008. Epub 2011 May 14.
4
The management of cancer pain.癌症疼痛的管理。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2011 May-Jun;61(3):157-82. doi: 10.3322/caac.20112. Epub 2011 May 4.
5
Change in cancer pain management in Korea between 2001 and 2006: results of two nationwide surveys.2001年至2006年韩国癌症疼痛管理的变化:两项全国性调查结果
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Jan;41(1):93-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.03.025. Epub 2010 Sep 26.
6
Prevalence of undertreatment in cancer pain. A review of published literature.癌症疼痛治疗不足的患病率。已发表文献综述。
Ann Oncol. 2008 Dec;19(12):1985-91. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdn419. Epub 2008 Jul 15.
7
Overcoming barriers to cancer pain management: an institutional change model.克服癌症疼痛管理的障碍:一种制度变革模式。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007 Oct;34(4):359-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.12.011. Epub 2007 Jul 5.
8
Prevalence of pain in patients with cancer: a systematic review of the past 40 years.癌症患者疼痛的患病率:对过去40年的系统综述
Ann Oncol. 2007 Sep;18(9):1437-49. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdm056. Epub 2007 Mar 12.
9
Pain assessment tools: is the content appropriate for use in palliative care?疼痛评估工具:其内容是否适用于姑息治疗?
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2006 Dec;32(6):567-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.05.025.
10
Cancer pain assessment in clinical trials. A review of the literature (1999-2002).临床试验中的癌症疼痛评估。文献综述(1999 - 2002年)
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2005 May;29(5):507-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2004.08.014.