• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者使用智能手机应用报告术后疼痛:概念验证。

Patient reported postoperative pain with a smartphone application: A proof of concept.

机构信息

Department Anesthesiology, OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 May 8;15(5):e0232082. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232082. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0232082
PMID:32384103
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7209286/
Abstract

MAIN OUTCOME

Thirty patients (60%) found it satisfying or very satisfying to communicate their pain with the app. Pain experienced after surgery was scored by patients as 'no': 3 (6%), 'little': 5 (10%), 'bearable': 25 (50%), 'considerable': 13 (26%) and 'severe': 1 (2%). Forty-five patients (90%) were positive about the ease of recording. Forty-five patients (90%) could correctly record their pain with the app. Thirty-eight patients (76%) agreed that in-app notifications to record pain were useful. Two patients (4%) were too ill to use the application. Based on usability feedback, we will redesign the pain intensity wheel and the in-app pain chart to improve clarity for patients to understand the course of their pain.

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

The median patient recorded pain app score 4.0 (range 0 to 10) and nurse recorded numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain NRS 4.0 (range 0 to 9) were not statistically different (p = 0.06). Forty-two percent from a total of 307 patient pain app scores were ≥ 5 (on a scale from 0 no pain at all to 10 worst imaginable pain). Of these, 83% were recorded as 'bearable' while only in 18% of the recordings patients asked for additional analgesia. The results suggest that self-recording the severity of postoperative pain by patients with a smartphone application could be useful for postoperative pain management. The application was perceived as user-friendly and had high satisfaction rates from both patients and stakeholders. Further research is needed to validate the 11-point numeric and faces pain scale with the current gold standards visual analogue scale (VAS) and NRS for pain.

摘要

主要结果

30 名患者(60%)表示通过应用程序表达疼痛的体验非常满意或满意。术后疼痛评分结果为:无(6%)、轻度(10%)、可忍受(50%)、明显(26%)和严重(2%)。45 名患者(90%)对记录的简便性给予积极评价。45 名患者(90%)能够正确使用应用程序记录疼痛。38 名患者(76%)认为应用程序内的疼痛记录通知很有用。有 2 名患者(4%)因病情太重而无法使用该应用程序。根据可用性反馈,我们将重新设计疼痛强度轮和应用内疼痛图表,以提高患者对疼痛过程的理解清晰度。

次要结果

患者记录的疼痛应用程序评分中位数为 4.0(范围 0 至 10),护士记录的数字评分量表(NRS)疼痛评分中位数为 4.0(范围 0 至 9),两者无统计学差异(p=0.06)。在总共 307 名患者的疼痛应用程序评分中,有 42%的评分≥5(评分范围为 0 表示完全无痛,10 表示可想象到的最严重疼痛)。在这些评分中,83%被记录为“可忍受”,而只有 18%的记录表明患者需要额外的镇痛。这些结果表明,患者使用智能手机应用程序自行记录术后疼痛的严重程度可能对术后疼痛管理有用。该应用程序被认为易于使用,患者和利益相关者的满意度都很高。需要进一步的研究来验证 11 点数字和面部疼痛量表与当前的金标准视觉模拟评分量表(VAS)和 NRS 疼痛之间的关系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f19/7209286/4ed25c40c93d/pone.0232082.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f19/7209286/c4354070a454/pone.0232082.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f19/7209286/65f3496a81aa/pone.0232082.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f19/7209286/74029ea840a6/pone.0232082.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f19/7209286/4ed25c40c93d/pone.0232082.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f19/7209286/c4354070a454/pone.0232082.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f19/7209286/65f3496a81aa/pone.0232082.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f19/7209286/74029ea840a6/pone.0232082.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f19/7209286/4ed25c40c93d/pone.0232082.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient reported postoperative pain with a smartphone application: A proof of concept.患者使用智能手机应用报告术后疼痛:概念验证。
PLoS One. 2020 May 8;15(5):e0232082. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232082. eCollection 2020.
2
In-hospital usability and feasibility evaluation of Panda, an app for the management of pain in children at home.一款用于居家儿童疼痛管理的应用程序——熊猫(Panda)的院内可用性与可行性评估。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2018 Oct;28(10):897-905. doi: 10.1111/pan.13471.
3
PROutine: a feasibility study assessing surveillance of electronic patient reported outcomes and adherence via smartphone app in advanced cancer.PROutine:一项评估通过智能手机应用程序对晚期癌症患者的电子患者报告结局及依从性进行监测的可行性研究。
Ann Palliat Med. 2019 Apr;8(2):104-111. doi: 10.21037/apm.2017.07.05. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
4
The evaluation of smartphone versions of the visual analogue scale and numeric rating scale as postoperative pain assessment tools: a prospective randomized trial.智能手机版视觉模拟评分法和数字评分法评估术后疼痛的效果:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Can J Anaesth. 2019 Jun;66(6):706-715. doi: 10.1007/s12630-019-01324-9. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
5
Postoperative pain assessment based on numeric ratings is not the same for patients and professionals: a cross-sectional study.基于数字评分的术后疼痛评估对患者和专业人员来说并不相同:一项横断面研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 Jan;49(1):65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.07.009. Epub 2011 Aug 15.
6
The diagnostic value of the numeric pain rating scale in older postoperative patients.数字疼痛评分量表在老年术后患者中的诊断价值。
J Clin Nurs. 2012 Nov;21(21-22):3018-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04288.x.
7
Development and testing of painometer: a smartphone app to assess pain intensity.疼痛计的开发与测试:一款用于评估疼痛强度的智能手机应用程序
J Pain. 2014 Oct;15(10):1001-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 May 20.
8
Effectiveness of app-based self-acupressure for women with menstrual pain compared to usual care: a randomized pragmatic trial.基于应用程序的自我穴位按压对缓解女性经期疼痛的效果与常规护理相比:一项随机实用试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;218(2):227.e1-227.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.570. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
9
Development and validation of a pain monitoring app for patients with musculoskeletal conditions (The Keele pain recorder feasibility study).开发和验证用于肌肉骨骼疾病患者的疼痛监测应用程序(基尔疼痛记录器可行性研究)。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Jan 25;19(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0741-z.
10
Longitudinal trial of a smartphone pain application for chronic pain patients: Predictors of compliance and satisfaction.慢性疼痛患者智能手机疼痛应用的纵向研究:依从性和满意度的预测因素。
J Telemed Telecare. 2018 Feb;24(2):93-100. doi: 10.1177/1357633X16679049. Epub 2016 Nov 10.

引用本文的文献

1
A smart device application for acute pain service in surgical patients at a tertiary hospital in South Korea: a prospective observational feasibility study.韩国一家三级医院用于外科患者急性疼痛服务的智能设备应用:一项前瞻性观察性可行性研究。
Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2024 Jul;19(3):216-226. doi: 10.17085/apm.24059. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
2
Patient self-reported pain and nausea via smartphone following day care surgery, first year results: An observational cohort study.日间手术患者术后通过智能手机自我报告疼痛和恶心情况,第一年结果:一项观察性队列研究。
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Jul 10;3(7):e0000342. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000342. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3

本文引用的文献

1
A Review of the Opioid Epidemic: What Do We Do About It?阿片类药物流行综述:我们该如何应对?
Pain Ther. 2018 Jun;7(1):23-36. doi: 10.1007/s40122-018-0096-7. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
2
Commercially Available Smartphone Apps to Support Postoperative Pain Self-Management: Scoping Review.支持术后疼痛自我管理的商用智能手机应用程序:范围综述
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Oct 23;5(10):e162. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.8230.
3
Mobile Phone Apps to Improve Medication Adherence: A Systematic Stepwise Process to Identify High-Quality Apps.用于提高药物依从性的手机应用程序:识别高质量应用程序的系统逐步流程。
Readiness for implementation of novel digital health interventions for postoperative monitoring: a systematic review and clinical innovation network analysis.
准备实施新型数字健康干预措施进行术后监测:系统评价和临床创新网络分析。
Lancet Digit Health. 2023 May;5(5):e295-e315. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00026-2.
4
Quality of recovery after day care surgery with app-controlled remote monitoring: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.日间手术中应用 APP 控制远程监护对术后恢复质量的影响:一项随机对照试验研究方案。
Trials. 2023 Feb 9;24(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07121-6.
5
Clinical feasibility of the Q1.6 Inguinal Hernia application: a prospective cohort study.Q1.6 腹股沟疝应用的临床可行性:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Hernia. 2023 Apr;27(2):449-458. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02646-2. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
6
Adoption of a Postoperative Pain Self-Report Tool: Qualitative Study.采用术后疼痛自我报告工具:定性研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Apr 26;9(2):e33706. doi: 10.2196/33706.
7
An Interactive Pain Application (MServ) Improves Postoperative Pain Management.互动疼痛应用(MServ)改善术后疼痛管理。
Pain Res Manag. 2021 Apr 2;2021:8898170. doi: 10.1155/2021/8898170. eCollection 2021.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Dec 2;4(4):e132. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.6742.
4
Code Saturation Versus Meaning Saturation: How Many Interviews Are Enough?代码饱和度与意义饱和度:多少次访谈才算足够?
Qual Health Res. 2017 Mar;27(4):591-608. doi: 10.1177/1049732316665344. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
5
A quality review of smartphone applications for the management of pain.用于疼痛管理的智能手机应用程序的质量评估。
Br J Pain. 2016 Aug;10(3):135-40. doi: 10.1177/2049463716638700. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
6
Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power.定性访谈研究中的样本量:以信息力为导向
Qual Health Res. 2016 Nov;26(13):1753-1760. doi: 10.1177/1049732315617444. Epub 2016 Jul 10.
7
Postoperative patients' perspectives on rating pain: A qualitative study.术后患者对疼痛评分的看法:一项定性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Jan;53:260-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.08.007. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
8
The Verbal Rating Scale Is Reliable for Assessment of Postoperative Pain in Hip Fracture Patients.语言评定量表在评估髋部骨折患者术后疼痛方面是可靠的。
Pain Res Treat. 2015;2015:676212. doi: 10.1155/2015/676212. Epub 2015 May 20.
9
Validity, Sensitivity, and Responsiveness of the 11-Face Faces Pain Scale to Postoperative Pain in Adult Orthopedic Surgery Patients.11 脸面部疼痛量表对成人骨科手术患者术后疼痛的效度、敏感性和反应性
Pain Manag Nurs. 2015 Oct;16(5):678-84. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2015.02.002. Epub 2015 May 9.
10
What makes a good home-based nocturnal seizure detector? A value sensitive design.什么造就了一款优秀的家庭夜间癫痫发作探测器?一种价值敏感型设计。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 13;10(4):e0121446. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121446. eCollection 2015.