• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

东南亚国家药品质量使用指标:系统评价。

Indicators of quality use of medicines in South-East Asian countries: a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh city, Ho Chi Minh city, Vietnam  Department of Pharmacotherapy and Pharmaceutical Care, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands  Center for Health Systems Research, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico  Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Trop Med Int Health. 2012 Dec;17(12):1552-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2012.03081.x. Epub 2012 Sep 14.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-3156.2012.03081.x
PMID:22974440
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To identify indicators of quality use of medicines used in South-East Asian region.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted searching MEDLINE, Embase and The International Network for Rational Use of Drugs (INRUD) and The World Health Organization (WHO) website. Original studies or reports carried out in the South-East Asian region, explicitly using indicators to measure quality use of medicines, and published between January 2000 and July 2011 were included.

RESULTS

A total of 17 studies conducted in 7 of 11 countries in South-East Asia were included. WHO indicators focusing on general medication use in health facilities were most widely used (10 studies). Twelve studies used non-WHO indicators for measuring quality use of medicines in clinical areas (geriatrics and obstetrics) or specific diseases, such as diarrhoea and pneumonia. In five studies, WHO indicators were used along with non-WHO indicators. There was little information available about validity, reliability and feasibility of the non-WHO indicators. The majority of indicators measured process rather than structure or outcome. There were very few indicators addressing non-communicable diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

A limited number of studies have been published explicitly using indicators of quality use of medicines across South-East Asia. Importantly, existing indicators need to be complemented with valid, reliable and feasible indicators related to non-communicable diseases, particularly those with a high financial burden to meet the current medical challenges in the region.

摘要

目的

确定东南亚地区使用的药品质量使用的指标。

方法

系统检索 MEDLINE、Embase 和国际合理用药网络(INRUD)以及世界卫生组织(WHO)网站,纳入 2000 年 1 月至 2011 年 7 月期间在东南亚地区进行的、明确使用指标来衡量药品质量使用的原始研究或报告。

结果

共纳入 11 个东南亚国家中的 7 个国家的 17 项研究。使用最广泛的是针对卫生机构一般药物使用的世卫组织指标(10 项研究)。12 项研究在临床领域(老年病学和妇产科)或特定疾病(如腹泻和肺炎)中使用非世卫组织指标来衡量药品质量使用。在五项研究中,同时使用了世卫组织和非世卫组织的指标。关于非世卫组织指标的有效性、可靠性和可行性的信息很少。大多数指标衡量的是过程而不是结构或结果。几乎没有指标涉及非传染性疾病。

结论

在整个东南亚地区,明确使用药品质量使用指标的研究数量有限。重要的是,需要用有效、可靠和可行的非传染性疾病指标来补充现有的指标,特别是那些对满足该地区当前医疗挑战具有高财务负担的指标。

相似文献

1
Indicators of quality use of medicines in South-East Asian countries: a systematic review.东南亚国家药品质量使用指标:系统评价。
Trop Med Int Health. 2012 Dec;17(12):1552-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2012.03081.x. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
2
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
3
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
4
Psychological therapies for post-traumatic stress disorder and comorbid substance use disorder.创伤后应激障碍及共病物质使用障碍的心理治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 4;4(4):CD010204. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010204.pub2.
5
Unconditional cash transfers for reducing poverty and vulnerabilities: effect on use of health services and health outcomes in low- and middle-income countries.用于减少贫困和脆弱性的无条件现金转移:对低收入和中等收入国家卫生服务利用及健康结果的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 15;11(11):CD011135. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011135.pub2.
6
Clinical effectiveness, tolerability and cost-effectiveness of newer drugs for epilepsy in adults: a systematic review and economic evaluation.成人癫痫新药的临床疗效、耐受性及成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Apr;9(15):1-157, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9150.
7
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
8
A systematic review and economic evaluation of the use of tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors, adalimumab and infliximab, for Crohn's disease.TNF-α 抑制剂(阿达木单抗和英夫利昔单抗)治疗克罗恩病的系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Feb;15(6):1-244. doi: 10.3310/hta15060.
9
Interventions for Old World cutaneous leishmaniasis.旧世界皮肤利什曼病的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 1;12(12):CD005067. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005067.pub5.
10
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Inter-rater reliability and validity of supervision performance assessment and recognition (SPARS) indicators to assess medicines management in public health facilities in Nepal.尼泊尔公共卫生机构药品管理监督绩效评估与认可(SPARS)指标的评分者间信度与效度
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2025 Mar 24;18(1):2477098. doi: 10.1080/20523211.2025.2477098. eCollection 2025.
2
Indicadores do uso de medicamentos na atenção primária de saúde: uma revisão sistemática.基层医疗中药物使用指标:一项系统综述。
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2017 Nov 11;41:e132. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2017.132. eCollection 2017.
3
Inter-rater reliability and validity of good pharmacy practices measures in inspection of public sector health facility pharmacies in Uganda.
乌干达公共部门卫生机构药房检查中良好药房实践措施的评分者间信度和效度
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2019 Jan 22;12:2. doi: 10.1186/s40545-018-0161-y. eCollection 2019.
4
An Investigation of Prescription Indicators and Trends Among General Practitioners and Specialists From 2005 to 2015 in Kerman, Iran.伊朗克尔曼 2005 年至 2015 年全科医生和专科医生处方指标及趋势调查
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Sep 1;7(9):818-827. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.28.
5
Evaluating inter-rater reliability of indicators to assess performance of medicines management in health facilities in Uganda.评估乌干达医疗机构药品管理绩效评估指标的评分者间信度。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2018 May 3;11:11. doi: 10.1186/s40545-018-0137-y. eCollection 2018.
6
Factors Influencing the Total Inpatient Pharmacy Cost at a Tertiary Hospital in Malaysia: A Retrospective Study.马来西亚一家三级医院住院药房总费用的影响因素:一项回顾性研究
Inquiry. 2018 Jan-Dec;55:46958018755483. doi: 10.1177/0046958018755483.
7
Essential medicines for universal health coverage.全民健康覆盖的基本药物。
Lancet. 2017 Jan 28;389(10067):403-476. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31599-9. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
8
Comparison of prescribing indicators of academic versus non-academic specialist physicians in Urmia, Iran.伊朗乌尔米耶学术型与非学术型专科医生处方指标的比较。
J Res Pharm Pract. 2015 Apr-Jun;4(2):45-50. doi: 10.4103/2279-042X.155749.