Suppr超能文献

延迟胸骨闭合并不会增加左心室辅助装置植入患者的晚期感染风险。

Delayed sternal closure does not increase late infection risk in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device implantation.

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester 55905, USA.

出版信息

J Heart Lung Transplant. 2012 Oct;31(10):1115-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2012.08.015.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Delayed sternal closure (DSC) is employed after conventional cardiac surgery without a significantly increased risk of late mediastinitis or sternal wound infection. There are no data specifically examining its late effects on patients undergoing implantation with a ventricular assist device (VAD).

METHODS

Between October 1996 and October 2010, 364 patients underwent primary VAD implant and DSC was utilized in 184 (51%) patients for coagulopathy (n = 155; 84%), hemodynamic instability (n = 103; 56%), isolated right ventricular dysfunction (n = 15; 8%) or unspecified reasons (n = 17; 9%).

RESULTS

Median duration of DSC was 1 day (range 1 to 7 days). Patients with DSC were older (54.5 vs. 50.3 years, p = 0.002), had a higher incidence of previous sternotomy (42% vs. 28%, p = 0.005), pre-operative intra-aortic balloon pump (50% vs. 30%, p < 0.001), pre-operative temporary extracorporeal mechanical circulatory support (23% vs 10%, p < 0.001), lower platelet counts (171,000 vs. 209,000, p < 0.001) and lower hematocrit levels (32% vs. 36%, p < 0.001). Operative (11% vs. 9%, p = 0.65) or late (2 years; 66 ± 7% vs 66 ± 7%, p = 0.720) mortality; composite incidence of mediastinitis, percutaneous drive-line infection, pocket infection and VAD-related endocarditis (15% vs. 16%, p = 0.79); re-exploration for bleeding (18% vs. 18%, p = 0.99); urgent transplantation for infection (4% vs. 3%, p = 0.99); or need for device exchange (9% vs. 10%, p = 0.16) was not increased after DSC when compared with immediate sternal closure. DSC increased ICU stay (10 vs. 5 days, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

DSC was performed most commonly for coagulopathy and/or hemodynamic instability, and patients were older with a greater severity of illness as shown by the higher incidence of right-sided circulatory failure and history of prior sternotomy. Although DSC was associated with longer ICU stay, DSC was not associated with a significantly increased risk of death or infection.

摘要

背景

在常规心脏手术后采用延迟胸骨闭合(DSC)并不会显著增加晚期纵隔炎或胸骨伤口感染的风险。目前尚无专门研究其对接受心室辅助装置(VAD)植入患者的晚期影响的数据。

方法

1996 年 10 月至 2010 年 10 月期间,364 例患者接受了原发性 VAD 植入,其中 184 例(51%)因凝血障碍(n=155;84%)、血流动力学不稳定(n=103;56%)、孤立性右心室功能障碍(n=15;8%)或不明原因(n=17;9%)采用 DSC。

结果

DSC 的中位持续时间为 1 天(范围 1 至 7 天)。接受 DSC 的患者年龄更大(54.5 岁 vs. 50.3 岁,p=0.002),既往胸骨切开术发生率更高(42% vs. 28%,p=0.005),术前主动脉内球囊泵(50% vs. 30%,p<0.001)、术前临时体外机械循环支持(23% vs. 10%,p<0.001)、血小板计数较低(171,000 比 209,000,p<0.001)和较低的血细胞比容水平(32% vs. 36%,p<0.001)。手术(11% vs. 9%,p=0.65)或晚期(2 年;66±7% vs. 66±7%,p=0.720)死亡率;复合性纵隔炎、经皮导线感染、囊袋感染和 VAD 相关心内膜炎(15% vs. 16%,p=0.79);因出血再次探查(18% vs. 18%,p=0.99);因感染紧急移植(4% vs. 3%,p=0.99);或需要更换设备(9% vs. 10%,p=0.16)在 DSC 后与即刻胸骨闭合相比并未增加。DSC 增加了 ICU 住院时间(10 天 vs. 5 天,p=0.001)。

结论

DSC 最常用于凝血障碍和/或血流动力学不稳定,且患者年龄更大,右侧循环衰竭发生率更高,既往有胸骨切开术史,表明疾病严重程度更高。尽管 DSC 与 ICU 住院时间延长有关,但与死亡率或感染风险增加无关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验