Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, NL-9700 RB Groningen, the Netherlands.
Phys Ther. 2013 Jan;93(1):22-31. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20120058. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
Intermanual transfer may improve prosthetic handling and acceptance if used in training soon after an amputation.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether intermanual transfer effects can be detected after training with a myoelectric upper-limb prosthesis simulator.
A mechanistic, randomized, pretest-posttest design was used.
A total of 48 right-handed participants (25 women, 23 men) who were able-bodied were randomly assigned to an experimental group or a control group.
The experimental group performed a training program of 5 days' duration using the prosthesis simulator. To determine the improvement in skill, a test was administered before, immediately after, and 6 days after training. The control group only performed the tests. Training was performed with the unaffected arm, and tests were performed with the affected arm (the affected arm simulating an amputated limb). Half of the participants were tested with the dominant arm and half with the nondominant arm.
Initiation time was defined as the time from starting signal until start of the movement, movement time was defined as the time from the beginning of the movement until completion of the task, and force control was defined as the maximal applied force on a deformable object.
The movement time decreased significantly more in the experimental group (F₂,₉₂=7.42, P=.001, η²(G)=.028) when compared with the control group. This finding is indicative of faster handling of the prosthesis. No statistically significant differences were found between groups with regard to initiation time and force control. We did not find a difference in intermanual transfer between the dominant and nondominant arms.
The training utilized participants who were able-bodied in a laboratory setting and focused only on transradial amputations.
Intermanual transfer was present in the affected arm after training the unaffected arm with a myoelectric prosthesis simulator, and this effect did not depend on laterality. This effect may improve rehabilitation of patients with an upper-limb amputation.
如果在截肢后不久的训练中使用,双手间的转移可能会改善假肢的操作和接受度。
本研究旨在确定使用肌电上肢假肢模拟器进行训练后是否可以检测到手间转移的效果。
采用机制随机、前后测试设计。
共有 48 名右利手参与者(25 名女性,23 名男性),他们身体健康,被随机分配到实验组或对照组。
实验组使用假肢模拟器进行了为期 5 天的训练计划。为了确定技能的提高,在训练前、训练后立即和训练后 6 天进行了测试。对照组仅进行了测试。训练是用未受影响的手臂进行的,测试是用受影响的手臂(受影响的手臂模拟截肢的手臂)进行的。一半的参与者用优势臂进行测试,一半用非优势臂进行测试。
启动时间定义为从启动信号开始到运动开始的时间,运动时间定义为运动开始到任务完成的时间,力控制定义为施加在可变形物体上的最大力。
实验组的运动时间明显减少(F₂,₉₂=7.42,P=.001,η²(G)=.028),与对照组相比。这一发现表明假肢的操作更快。组间在启动时间和力控制方面没有统计学上的显著差异。我们没有发现优势臂和非优势臂之间的手间转移有差异。
该训练利用了在实验室环境中身体健全的参与者,并且仅关注桡骨截肢。
在用肌电假肢模拟器训练非受影响的手臂后,受影响的手臂中出现了手间转移,而且这种效果不依赖于偏侧性。这种效果可能会改善上肢截肢患者的康复。