• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伊朗常见放射学检查的入射表面剂量及健康风险评估。

Assessment of entrance surface dose and health risk from common radiology examinations in Iran.

作者信息

Shahbazi-Gahrouei Daryoush, Baradaran-Ghahfarokhi Milad

机构信息

Department of Medical Physics and Medical Engineering, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

出版信息

Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2013;154(3):308-13. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncs244. Epub 2012 Sep 13.

DOI:10.1093/rpd/ncs244
PMID:22977172
Abstract

Medical X-ray exposures are the largest man-made source of population exposure to ionising radiation in many countries. Although information on medical exposure is already incorporated into national legislative documents, in Isfahan there is no data on the assessment of patient's entrance surface dose (ESD) and the health risk from conventional radiography in daily clinical practice. The aim of this study was to investigate ESDs and the consequent health risk for the patients undergoing routine X-ray procedures in hospitals  under the control of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Iran, in year 2011. The values of ESDs were measured for common radiographical examinations with the highest absorbed dose to the patient in seven hospitals (Alzahra, Ashrafi-Khomeini-shahr, Feyz, Isabne-Maryam, Kashani, Nour-Aliasghar and Seyed-Al Shohada) and six stationary X-ray machines (General Electric, USA; Phillips, The Netherlands; Siemens, Germany; Shimadzu, Japan; Toshiba, Japan and Varian, USA). The results of the ESD measurements as well as the calculated effective dose values between different X-ray examinations showed values significantly greater than those recorded in some other countries especially for the high tube potential technique (such as the skull) by factors of 2.5-5.0. Based on the fatality risk of 5 % per sievert, it was estimated that, for chest and skull examinations approximately two (40.18 person-Sv×5 % per sievert) and one (2.53 person-Sv×5 % per sievert) cases of health risk, respectively, may in the future be attributable to diagnostic X rays done in year 2011 in Isfahan. Efforts should be taken to further lower patient doses while securing image quality. The need to provide relevant education and training to staff in the radiology sections is of utmost importance.

摘要

在许多国家,医用X射线照射是公众遭受电离辐射的最大人为来源。尽管有关医用照射的信息已纳入国家立法文件,但在伊斯法罕,日常临床实践中尚无关于患者体表入射剂量(ESD)评估以及传统X线摄影健康风险的数据。本研究旨在调查2011年伊朗伊斯法罕医科大学管辖下的医院中,接受常规X射线检查的患者的ESD及其相应的健康风险。对七家医院(阿尔扎赫拉、阿什拉菲-霍梅尼沙赫尔、费兹、伊萨布内-玛丽亚姆、卡沙尼、努尔-阿里亚斯加尔和赛义德-阿尔舒哈达)和六台固定式X射线机(美国通用电气公司、荷兰飞利浦公司、德国西门子公司、日本岛津公司、日本东芝公司和美国瓦里安公司)进行的常见射线照相检查中,测量了对患者吸收剂量最高的ESD值。ESD测量结果以及不同X射线检查之间计算得出的有效剂量值显示,这些值显著高于其他一些国家记录的值,尤其是高管电压技术(如颅骨检查),高出2.5至5.0倍。根据每西弗特5%的致死风险估计,对于胸部和颅骨检查,未来可能分别有大约两例(40.18人·西弗特×每西弗特5%)和一例(2.53人·西弗特×每西弗特5%)健康风险可归因于2011年在伊斯法罕进行的诊断性X射线检查。应在确保图像质量的同时,努力进一步降低患者剂量。为放射科工作人员提供相关教育和培训至关重要。

相似文献

1
Assessment of entrance surface dose and health risk from common radiology examinations in Iran.伊朗常见放射学检查的入射表面剂量及健康风险评估。
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2013;154(3):308-13. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncs244. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
2
Investigation of patient dose from common radiology examinations in Isfahan, Iran.伊朗伊斯法罕常见放射学检查的患者剂量调查。
Adv Biomed Res. 2012;1:11. doi: 10.4103/2277-9175.96064. Epub 2012 May 11.
3
Update of diagnostic medical and dental x-ray exposures in Romania.罗马尼亚诊断性医学和牙科X射线照射情况的更新。
J Radiol Prot. 2008 Dec;28(4):563-71. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/28/4/008. Epub 2008 Nov 24.
4
Estimation of adult patient doses for common diagnostic X-ray examinations in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.巴西里约热内卢常见诊断性X射线检查的成年患者剂量估算。
Phys Med. 2008 Mar;24(1):21-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2007.11.002.
5
Management of patient doses and diagnostic reference levels in X-ray radiography in Lithuania.立陶宛X射线摄影中患者剂量与诊断参考水平的管理
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2010 Apr-May;139(1-3):313-6. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncq102. Epub 2010 Mar 8.
6
Local diagnostic reference levels for some common diagnostic X-ray examinations in Tehran county of Iran.伊朗德黑兰县一些常见诊断性X射线检查的局部诊断参考水平。
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2007;124(2):137-44. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncm175. Epub 2007 May 10.
7
Doses to patients in some routine diagnostic X-ray examinations in Iran: proposed the first Iranian diagnostic reference levels.伊朗一些常规诊断性X射线检查中患者的剂量:提出首个伊朗诊断参考水平。
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2008;132(4):409-14. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncn308. Epub 2008 Dec 23.
8
First results on patient dose measurements from conventional diagnostic radiology procedures in Serbia and Montenegro.塞尔维亚和黑山常规诊断放射学程序的患者剂量测量初步结果。
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;113(3):330-5. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nch469. Epub 2005 Mar 8.
9
Patient exposure in medical X-ray imaging in Europe.欧洲医学X射线成像中的患者照射情况。
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;114(1-3):11-25. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nch538.
10
Medical exposure of the population from diagnostic use of ionizing radiation in luxembourg between 1994 and 2002.1994年至2002年期间卢森堡民众因电离辐射诊断用途而受到的医疗照射。
Health Phys. 2006 Aug;91(2):154-62. doi: 10.1097/01.HP.0000205237.00357.58.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Male Gonadal Radiation Dose in Abdominal X-ray Examinations: The Impact of Radiographic Projections and Kilovoltage Peak (kVp).腹部X线检查中男性性腺辐射剂量的评估:X线投照方式和管电压峰值(kVp)的影响
Cureus. 2024 Dec 22;16(12):e76175. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76175. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
An Approach in Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning: A Fast, GPU-Based Monte Carlo Method.放射治疗治疗计划中的一种方法:一种基于图形处理器(GPU)的快速蒙特卡罗方法。
J Med Signals Sens. 2017 Apr-Jun;7(2):108-113.
3
Patient dose measurement in common medical X-ray examinations in Iran.
伊朗常见医学X射线检查中的患者剂量测量
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 Jan 8;17(1):374-386. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v17i1.5860.
4
Measurement of Entrance Skin Dose and Calculation of Effective Dose for Common Diagnostic X-Ray Examinations in Kashan, Iran.伊朗卡尚常见诊断性X射线检查的入射皮肤剂量测量与有效剂量计算
Glob J Health Sci. 2015 Feb 24;7(5):202-7. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v7n5p202.