Suppr超能文献

在有和没有阴道镜检查可见宫颈疾病的患者中,使用p16INK4a免疫细胞化学表达预测低级别鳞状上皮内病变及意义未明的高危型HPV阳性非典型鳞状细胞的临床结局。

Prediction of clinical outcome using p16INK4a immunocytochemical expression in low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and high-risk HPV-positive atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in patients with and without colposcopic evident cervical disease.

作者信息

Lukic Ankica, Sbenaglia Giorgio, Carico Elisabetta, DI Properzio Matilde, Giarnieri Enrico, Frega Antonio, Nobili Flavia, Moscarini Massimo, Giovagnoli Maria Rosaria

机构信息

Dipartimento Salute della Donna e Medicina Territoriale, UOC Ginecologia, Facoltà di Medicina e Psicologia, Sapienza Università di Roma, 00189 Rome;

出版信息

Exp Ther Med. 2011 Sep;2(5):853-858. doi: 10.3892/etm.2011.316. Epub 2011 Jul 1.

Abstract

p16INK4a as a diagnostic marker of a cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2+ (CIN2+) in atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) cytological samples has been analyzed, but has not yet been included in clinical routine practice. One hundred and ninety-one patients with an abnormal Pap test (84 ASC-US and 107 LSILs) who underwent colposcopy were selected for this study. At enrollment, 96 patients (Group 1) had a positive colposcopy and therefore underwent a cervical biopsy, while 95 (Group 2) had a negative colposcopy and were followed up for up to 1 year. Both groups were tested for p16INK4a using immunocytochemical methods, and the p16INK4a results were correlated with histology or follow-up outcome. In Group 1 ASC-US cases, 82% of lesions less than CIN2 were p16INK4a-negative and all CIN2 cases were p16INK4a-positive (p=0.00044). In Group 1 LSIL cases, 71% of lesions less than CIN2 were p16INK4a-negative and 87% of CIN2/3 were p16INK4a-positive (p=0.00033). Seventy-seven percent of Group 2 ASC-US patients with a negative 1-year follow-up (NF-U) were p16INK4a-negative at enrollment, while all patients with positive follow-up (PF-U) were p16INK4a-positive (p=0.00113). In Group 2 LSIL cases, 83% of patients with NF-U were p16INK4a-negative, while 65% of patients with PF-U were p16INK4a-positive at enrollment (p=0.0014). In fact, 39% of the positive p16INK4a LSIL patients had CIN2+ histological lesions. The positive predictive value of p16INK4a for CIN2+ was 50% in ASC-US and 52% in LSIL cases; the negative predictive value was 100 and 94%, respectively. In conclusion, in our patients, a negative p16INK4a appears to be a marker of the absence of CIN3, while a positive p16INK4a can be correlated with the presence of histological CIN2+ found at enrollment or during the subsequent follow-up. Thus, its clinical predictive value is independent from the colposcopic aspect at enrollment.

摘要

p16INK4a作为意义不明确的非典型鳞状细胞(ASC-US)和低级别鳞状上皮内病变(LSIL)细胞学样本中2级及以上宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN2+)的诊断标志物已得到分析,但尚未纳入临床常规实践。本研究选取了191例接受阴道镜检查的巴氏试验异常患者(84例ASC-US和107例LSIL)。入组时,96例患者(第1组)阴道镜检查结果为阳性,因此接受了宫颈活检,而95例(第2组)阴道镜检查结果为阴性,并随访长达1年。两组均采用免疫细胞化学方法检测p16INK4a,p16INK4a结果与组织学或随访结果相关。在第1组ASC-US病例中,小于CIN2的病变82%为p16INK4a阴性,所有CIN2病例均为p16INK4a阳性(p=0.00044)。在第1组LSIL病例中,小于CIN2的病变71%为p16INK4a阴性,CIN2/3的病变87%为p16INK4a阳性(p=0.00033)。第2组中,1年随访阴性(NF-U)的ASC-US患者77%在入组时p16INK4a为阴性,而所有随访阳性(PF-U)的患者p16INK4a为阳性(p=0.00113)。在第2组LSIL病例中,NF-U的患者83%在入组时p16INK4a为阴性,而PF-U的患者65%在入组时p16INK4a为阳性(p=0.0014)。事实上,p16INK4a阳性的LSIL患者中39%有CIN2+组织学病变。p16INK4a对CIN2+的阳性预测值在ASC-US病例中为50%,在LSIL病例中为52%;阴性预测值分别为100%和94%。总之,在我们的患者中,p16INK4a阴性似乎是不存在CIN3的标志物,而p16INK4a阳性可能与入组时或后续随访中发现的组织学CIN2+有关。因此,其临床预测价值独立于入组时的阴道镜表现。

相似文献

6
Diagnosis of Cervical Precancers by Endocervical Curettage at Colposcopy of Women With Abnormal Cervical Cytology.
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Dec;130(6):1218-1225. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002330.

引用本文的文献

1
Expression and role of p16 and GLUT1 in malignant diseases and lung cancer: A review.
Thorac Cancer. 2020 Nov;11(11):3060-3070. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13651. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
2
Makorin Ring Finger Protein 1 as Adjunctive Marker in Liquid-based Cervical Cytology.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jan;95(3):e2425. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002425.
3
HPV16 E6*II gene expression in intraepithelial cervical lesions as an indicator of neoplastic grade: a pilot study.
Med Oncol. 2014 Mar;31(3):842. doi: 10.1007/s12032-014-0842-6. Epub 2014 Jan 17.

本文引用的文献

1
[Should CIN 2 and 3 be treated the same way?].
Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2011 Feb;39(2):94-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2010.11.001. Epub 2011 Feb 16.
2
Using biomarkers as objective standards in the diagnosis of cervical biopsies.
Am J Surg Pathol. 2010 Aug;34(8):1077-87. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181e8b2c4.
5
p16INK4A in routine practice as a marker of cervical epithelial neoplasia.
Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Oct;115(1):127-131. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.06.020. Epub 2009 Jul 12.
6
Antibody anti-p16(INK4a) in cervical cytology.
Acta Cytol. 2009 May-Jun;53(3):253-62. doi: 10.1159/000325304.
8
p16(INK4a) immunostaining in cytological and histological specimens from the uterine cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Cancer Treat Rev. 2009 May;35(3):210-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2008.10.005. Epub 2009 Mar 3.
10
European guidelines for clinical management of abnormal cervical cytology, part 2.
Cytopathology. 2009 Feb;20(1):5-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2008.00636.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验