Medical Research Council Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, 4 Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow, G12 8RZ, UK.
BMC Public Health. 2012 Sep 14;12:788. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-788.
Few of the many behavioral sexual health interventions in Africa have been rigorously evaluated. Where biological outcomes have been measured, improvements have rarely been found. One of the most rigorous trials was of the multi-component MEMA kwa Vijana adolescent sexual health programme, which showed improvements in knowledge and reported attitudes and behaviour, but none in biological outcomes. This paper attempts to explain these outcomes by reviewing the process evaluation findings, particularly in terms of contextual factors.
A large-scale, primarily qualitative process evaluation based mainly on participant observation identified the principal contextual barriers and facilitators of behavioural change.
The contextual barriers involved four interrelated socio-structural factors: culture (i.e. shared practices and systems of belief), economic circumstances, social status, and gender. At an individual level they appeared to operate through the constructs of the theories underlying MEMA kwa Vijana - Social Cognitive Theory and the Theory of Reasoned Action - but the intervention was unable to substantially modify these individual-level constructs, apart from knowledge.
The process evaluation suggests that one important reason for this failure is that the intervention did not operate sufficiently at a structural level, particularly in regard to culture. Recently most structural interventions have focused on gender or/and economics. Complementing these with a cultural approach could address the belief systems that justify and perpetuate gender and economic inequalities, as well as other barriers to behaviour change.
在非洲,有许多行为性健康干预措施,但其中只有少数经过了严格的评估。在已经测量了生物学结果的研究中,很少有发现改善的情况。其中最严格的试验之一是多组分 MEMA kwa Vijana 青少年性健康方案,该方案显示了知识和报告态度和行为的改善,但在生物学结果方面没有改善。本文试图通过回顾过程评估结果来解释这些结果,特别是从情境因素的角度。
一项大规模的、主要基于定性的过程评估主要基于参与者观察,确定了行为改变的主要情境障碍和促进因素。
情境障碍涉及四个相互关联的社会结构因素:文化(即共同的实践和信仰体系)、经济环境、社会地位和性别。在个体层面上,它们似乎通过 MEMA kwa Vijana 背后的理论的结构来运作——社会认知理论和理性行动理论——但干预措施除了知识外,无法实质性地改变这些个体层面的结构。
过程评估表明,这种失败的一个重要原因是干预措施在结构层面上运作不足,特别是在文化方面。最近,大多数结构干预措施都集中在性别或/和经济方面。通过补充一种文化方法,可以解决那些证明和延续性别和经济不平等以及其他行为改变障碍的信仰体系。