Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Am Heart J. 2012 Sep;164(3):303-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.06.006. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
Cardiovascular clinical trials are increasingly conducted globally as a means to reduce costs, expedite timelines, provide broad applicability, and satisfy regulatory authorities. Potential problems with trial globalization include regional differences in patient characteristics, medical practice patterns, and health policies which may influence outcomes and limit generalizability. Moreover, concerns have been raised about ethical misconduct and unsatisfactory quality oversight in regions with less trial experience and infrastructure. This article reviews geographical differences in cardiovascular trials in heart failure, acute coronary syndromes, hypertension and atrial fibrillation. It also explores potential explanations for these differences and methods to standardize the presentation of trial results. This review is based on discussions between basic scientists and clinical trialists at the 8th Global Cardio Vascular Clinical Trialists Forum 2011 in Paris, France, from December 2 to 3.
心血管临床试验在全球范围内的开展日益增多,其目的是降低成本、加快进度、提供广泛的适用性并满足监管机构的要求。临床试验全球化可能存在的问题包括患者特征、医疗实践模式和卫生政策在地域上存在差异,这可能会影响结果并限制其普遍性。此外,人们还对试验经验和基础设施较少的地区存在的伦理不当行为和不尽人意的质量监督表示担忧。本文综述了心力衰竭、急性冠状动脉综合征、高血压和心房颤动领域心血管临床试验中的地域差异。本文还探讨了这些差异的潜在原因以及使试验结果呈现标准化的方法。本文的综述基于基础科学家和临床试验研究者在 2011 年 12 月 2 日至 3 日于法国巴黎举行的第八届全球心血管临床试验论坛上的讨论。