University of North Carolina Center for Heart and Vascular Care, Division of Cardiology, Chapel Hill, USA.
Am Heart J. 2012 Sep;164(3):373-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.06.018.
Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are pivotal treatment options for patients with end-stage heart failure. Despite robust left ventricular unloading, the right ventricle remains unsupported and susceptible to hemodynamic perturbations from ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). Little is known about the epidemiology, management, resource use, and outcomes of sustained VAs in continuous-flow LVAD patients.
We reviewed data from all consecutive patients receiving a continuous-flow LVAD at the University of North Carolina from January 2006 to February 2011. Patient demographics, pharmacotherapies, resource use, and outcomes were recorded. Descriptive statistics were generated, and multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the independent association of clinical variables on the development of postimplantation VAs.
Of 61 patients, 26 (43%) had sustained VAs after LVAD. Most were male (65%), had history of hypertension (65%), and had nonischemic cardiomyopathy (62%). Patients with VAs after LVAD more often had preimplant VAs (62% vs 14%, P < .01), prior implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (92% vs 71%, P = .04), and history of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator discharge (38% vs 11%, P < .01). Although length of stay was similar, those with postimplant VAs had greater rehospitalization rates, greater antiarrhythmic drug use, and frequently required external defibrillation. Using multivariable logistic regression, only history of prior VA was associated with postimplant arrhythmias (odds ratio 13.7, P < .001).
Ventricular arrhythmias in LVAD patients are common, often refractory to conservative therapy, and associated with frequent rehospitalization. Post-LVAD VAs, however, did not significantly impact survival or transplantation rates. Arrhythmia burden should be considered before LVAD placement, and future study should focus on the impact of VAs on quality of life.
左心室辅助装置(LVAD)是终末期心力衰竭患者的重要治疗选择。尽管左心室卸载效果显著,但右心室仍然没有得到支持,容易受到室性心律失常(VA)的血流动力学干扰。对于持续性 LVAD 患者 VA 的流行病学、管理、资源利用和结果,人们知之甚少。
我们回顾了 2006 年 1 月至 2011 年 2 月期间在北卡罗来纳大学接受连续血流 LVAD 的所有连续患者的数据。记录患者的人口统计学、药物治疗、资源利用和结果。生成描述性统计数据,并使用多变量逻辑回归评估临床变量对植入后 VA 发展的独立相关性。
在 61 名患者中,26 名(43%)在 LVAD 后出现持续性 VA。大多数为男性(65%),有高血压病史(65%),非缺血性心肌病(62%)。植入后发生 VA 的患者更常患有植入前 VA(62%比 14%,P <.01)、先前的植入式心脏除颤器(92%比 71%,P =.04)和植入式心脏除颤器放电史(38%比 11%,P <.01)。尽管住院时间相似,但植入后发生 VA 的患者再住院率更高,抗心律失常药物使用率更高,经常需要外部除颤。使用多变量逻辑回归,只有先前的 VA 史与植入后心律失常相关(优势比 13.7,P <.001)。
LVAD 患者的室性心律失常很常见,经常对保守治疗有抗性,并且与频繁再住院有关。然而,LVAD 后 VA 并没有显著影响生存率或移植率。在 LVAD 放置之前应考虑心律失常负担,未来的研究应侧重于 VA 对生活质量的影响。