Suppr超能文献

在严重心力衰竭患者中同时使用植入式心脏复律除颤器和左心室辅助装置。

Simultaneous use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and left ventricular assist devices in patients with severe heart failure.

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2010 Feb 1;105(3):378-82. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.09.044. Epub 2009 Dec 22.

Abstract

More patients who are receiving therapy with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) also have an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). The aim of the present study was to describe the outcomes and device interactions of simultaneous therapy with an ICD and a LVAD. We evaluated 76 patients with class IV heart failure (age 52 + or - 12 years, left ventricular ejection fraction 0.13 + or - 0.05%, 88% men, 61% nonischemic cardiomyopathy) with both an ICD and a LVAD. The median follow-up with both devices was 156 days. A LVAD with a pulsatile and continuous flow pump was used in 53 (70%) and 23 (30%) patients, respectively. Of the 76 patients, 12 (16%) received a total of 54 ICD therapies. Of the ICD therapies, 88% were appropriate. Of the 76 patients, 55 (72%) underwent heart transplantation a median of 146 days after LVAD implantation. Twelve patients (16%) died during simultaneous ICD and LVAD therapy. Interactions between the LVAD and ICD occurred in 2 patients (2.7%) with continuous flow pumps (HeartMate II). In both cases, telemetry failure occurred after LVAD implantation with 2 different models of ICDs from the same manufacturer. No ICD therapies occurred because of device-related interactions. In conclusion, simultaneous ICD and LVAD therapy in patients with severe congestive heart failure is safe and clinically feasible. Interactions between the devices are uncommon and appear limited to specific models of ICDs.

摘要

更多接受左心室辅助装置 (LVAD) 治疗的患者也植入了植入式心脏复律除颤器 (ICD)。本研究旨在描述同时使用 ICD 和 LVAD 治疗的结果和设备交互。我们评估了 76 名患有 IV 级心力衰竭的患者(年龄 52±12 岁,左心室射血分数 0.13±0.05%,88%为男性,61%为非缺血性心肌病),他们同时使用 ICD 和 LVAD。两种设备的中位随访时间为 156 天。使用搏动式和连续流泵的 LVAD 分别在 53(70%)和 23(30%)名患者中使用。在 76 名患者中,共有 12 名(16%)接受了总共 54 次 ICD 治疗。在 ICD 治疗中,88%为适当治疗。在 76 名患者中,55 名(72%)在 LVAD 植入后中位 146 天接受了心脏移植。12 名(16%)患者在同时使用 ICD 和 LVAD 治疗期间死亡。在 2 名使用连续流泵(HeartMate II)的患者中发生了 2 起(2.7%)LVAD 和 ICD 之间的相互作用。在这两种情况下,在植入来自同一制造商的两种不同型号的 ICD 后,都出现了遥测故障。由于设备相关的相互作用,没有发生 ICD 治疗。总之,在严重充血性心力衰竭患者中同时使用 ICD 和 LVAD 治疗是安全且临床可行的。设备之间的相互作用并不常见,似乎仅限于特定型号的 ICD。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验