Garzón González Gerardo, Rodríguez Morales David, Rodríguez Palomino Miguel Ángel, Toledo Gómez David, Hernández Barrera Valentín, Gil De Miguel Angel
Gerencia AP, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Madrid, España.
Aten Primaria. 2012 Dec;44(12):709-19. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
To study relationship between institutional process indicators (measured using electronic records) and intermediate outcomes of patients with hypertension.
Cross-sectional epidemiological study.
Primary Care Health District 1. Madrid. 2010.
All patients with hypertension. n=80,306.
Variables. Independent. Institutional process indicators. Dependent. Intermediate outcomes: blood pressure within target limits, LDL-cholesterol, tobacco and weight and detected complications. Confounding. Age, gender, co-morbidity, drugs and professional variables.
The BP of 55.1% (SE 0.2%) of patients was within target limits. Bivariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression showed that the recording of some process indicators was associated with an increase in the probability to achieve targets in intermediate outcomes: smoking advice (OR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.61 - 1.77), reviewing personal history (OR: 1.54, 95% CI:1.42-1.68), increase was less or biased: BP (OR: 1.19, 95% CI:1.14-1.25), sodium and potassium (OR: 1.14, 95% CI:1.09-1.19), BMI (OR 1.08, 95% CI:1.04-1.12); also diabetes, edema, and creatinine, but there was timing bias. The relationship between other indicators (those oriented to lifestyle, family history, classification, urine examination, reviewing of drug therapy, LDL, electrocardiogram and cardiac auscultation) and a higher probability to achieve targets was not found.
In hypertension, some institutional process indicators measured on electronic records were associated with an increase in the probability to achieve targets in intermediate outcomes. No relationship was found between other indicators. This suggests maintaining process and outcome measurement, to include the impact of interventions, to prioritize improvements in process indicators that show low performance and high impact and to remove or to change process indicators where no relationship is found.
研究机构流程指标(通过电子记录测量)与高血压患者中间结局之间的关系。
横断面流行病学研究。
马德里第一初级保健卫生区。2010年。
所有高血压患者。n = 80306。
变量。独立变量:机构流程指标。因变量:中间结局:血压控制在目标范围内、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇、吸烟情况、体重以及检测到的并发症。混杂因素:年龄、性别、合并症、药物和专业变量。
55.1%(标准误0.2%)的患者血压控制在目标范围内。双变量分析和多因素逻辑回归显示,一些流程指标的记录与中间结局达到目标概率的增加相关:吸烟建议(比值比:1.69,95%置信区间:1.61 - 1.77)、回顾个人病史(比值比:1.54,95%置信区间:1.42 - 1.68),增加幅度较小或存在偏差的指标有:血压(比值比:1.19,95%置信区间:1.14 - 1.25)、钠和钾(比值比:1.14,95%置信区间:1.09 - 1.19)、体重指数(比值比1.08,95%置信区间:1.04 - 1.12);还有糖尿病、水肿和肌酐,但存在时间偏差。未发现其他指标(那些针对生活方式、家族史、分类、尿液检查、药物治疗回顾、低密度脂蛋白、心电图和心脏听诊的指标)与更高的目标达成概率之间的关系。
在高血压患者中,一些通过电子记录测量的机构流程指标与中间结局达到目标概率的增加相关。未发现其他指标之间存在关系。这表明应持续进行流程和结局测量,以纳入干预措施的影响,优先改进表现不佳但影响较大的流程指标,并去除或更改未发现关系的流程指标。