Suppr超能文献

共病和并发症对烧伤伤患康复住院治疗结果的影响。

The impact of comorbidities and complications on burn injury inpatient rehabilitation outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 125 Nashua St, Boston, MA 02114, USA.

出版信息

PM R. 2013 Feb;5(2):114-21. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.07.014. Epub 2012 Sep 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the impact of comorbidities and complications on burn inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRF) outcomes.

DESIGN

A retrospective cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Inpatient rehabilitation hospitals.

PATIENTS

A total of 4572 patients with a primary diagnosis of burn injury from the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation database from 2002 to 2010. METHODS OR INTERVENTIONS: Regression analyses were used to determine whether 3 different comorbidity measures (Charlson Comorbidity Index, Elixhauser Comoribidity Index, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Comorbidity Tiers) and 1 complication measure improved the predictive model (c-statistic) for each outcome measure.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Community discharge, Functional Independence Measure (FIM) gain, length of stay efficiency, transfer to acute care within the first 3 days of IRF stay, and transfer to acute care for all time periods.

RESULTS

For all outcomes, there was no difference between the Standard Model and the models that include the comorbidity and complication variables as measured by the c-statistic confidence intervals.

CONCLUSIONS

Comorbidities and complications did not significantly affect burn IRF outcomes. Future research is needed to examine the impact of comorbidities and complications on outcomes of other IRF populations to better understand the implications for current and future health care policy.

摘要

目的

探讨合并症和并发症对烧伤住院康复设施(IRF)结果的影响。

设计

回顾性横断面研究。

设置

住院康复医院。

患者

来自 2002 年至 2010 年统一数据系统医学康复数据库的 4572 名原发性烧伤损伤患者。

方法或干预措施

回归分析用于确定 3 种不同的合并症测量方法(Charlson 合并症指数、Elixhauser 合并症指数、医疗保险和医疗补助服务合并症分层)和 1 种并发症测量方法是否改善了每个结果测量的预测模型(c 统计量)。

主要观察指标

社区出院、功能独立性测量(FIM)增益、住院时间效率、在 IRF 住院的前 3 天内转至急性护理病房,以及在所有时间段内转至急性护理病房。

结果

对于所有结果,c 统计量置信区间测量的标准模型和包含合并症和并发症变量的模型之间没有差异。

结论

合并症和并发症对烧伤 IRF 结果没有显著影响。需要进一步研究合并症和并发症对其他 IRF 人群结果的影响,以更好地了解对当前和未来医疗保健政策的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验