Slocum Chloe, Gerrard Paul, Black-Schaffer Randie, Goldstein Richard, Singhal Aneesh, DiVita Margaret A, Ryan Colleen M, Mix Jacqueline, Purohit Maulik, Niewczyk Paulette, Kazis Lewis, Zafonte Ross, Schneider Jeffrey C
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 23;10(11):e0142180. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142180. eCollection 2015.
Acute care readmission risk is an increasingly recognized problem that has garnered significant attention, yet the reasons for acute care readmission in the inpatient rehabilitation population are complex and likely multifactorial. Information on both medical comorbidities and functional status is routinely collected for stroke patients participating in inpatient rehabilitation. We sought to determine whether functional status is a more robust predictor of acute care readmissions in the inpatient rehabilitation stroke population compared with medical comorbidities using a large, administrative data set.
A retrospective analysis of data from the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation from the years 2002 to 2011 was performed examining stroke patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation facilities. A Basic Model for predicting acute care readmission risk based on age and functional status was compared with models incorporating functional status and medical comorbidities (Basic-Plus) or models including age and medical comorbidities alone (Age-Comorbidity). C-statistics were compared to evaluate model performance.
There were a total of 803,124 patients: 88,187 (11%) patients were transferred back to an acute hospital: 22,247 (2.8%) within 3 days, 43,481 (5.4%) within 7 days, and 85,431 (10.6%) within 30 days. The C-statistics for the Basic Model were 0.701, 0.672, and 0.682 at days 3, 7, and 30 respectively. As compared to the Basic Model, the best-performing Basic-Plus model was the Basic+Elixhauser model with C-statistics differences of +0.011, +0.011, and + 0.012, and the best-performing Age-Comorbidity model was the Age+Elixhauser model with C-statistic differences of -0.124, -0.098, and -0.098 at days 3, 7, and 30 respectively.
Readmission models for the inpatient rehabilitation stroke population based on functional status and age showed better predictive ability than models based on medical comorbidities.
急性护理再入院风险是一个日益受到关注的问题,已引起广泛重视,但住院康复患者急性护理再入院的原因复杂,可能是多因素的。对于参与住院康复的中风患者,通常会收集医疗合并症和功能状态两方面的信息。我们试图利用一个大型管理数据集,确定与医疗合并症相比,功能状态是否是住院康复中风患者急性护理再入院更强有力的预测指标。
对2002年至2011年医疗康复统一数据系统中的数据进行回顾性分析,研究入住住院康复设施的中风患者。将基于年龄和功能状态预测急性护理再入院风险的基本模型与纳入功能状态和医疗合并症的模型(基本加模型)或仅包括年龄和医疗合并症的模型(年龄合并症模型)进行比较。比较C统计量以评估模型性能。
共有803,124名患者:88,187名(11%)患者转回急性医院:3天内22,247名(2.8%),7天内43,481名(5.4%),30天内85,431名(10.6%)。基本模型在第3天、第7天和第30天的C统计量分别为0.701、0.672和0.682。与基本模型相比,表现最佳的基本加模型是基本+埃利克斯豪泽模型,其C统计量差异分别为+0.011、+0.011和+0.012,表现最佳的年龄合并症模型是年龄+埃利克斯豪泽模型,其在第3天、第7天和第30天的C统计量差异分别为-0.124、-0.098和-0.098。
基于功能状态和年龄的住院康复中风患者再入院模型比基于医疗合并症的模型具有更好的预测能力。