Suppr超能文献

非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术后卒中发生率的比较。

Comparison of frequency of postoperative stroke in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2012 Dec 15;110(12):1773-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.08.010. Epub 2012 Sep 13.

Abstract

The stroke rate after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) compared to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is generally considered high because cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic manipulations are often associated with cerebrovascular complications. However, an increasing number of CABGs performed without cardiopulmonary bypass (OPCAB) may improve those outcomes. Of 6,323 patients with multivessel and/or left main coronary artery disease, 3,877 patients underwent PCI, 1,381 conventional on-pump CABG, and 1,065 OPCAB. Median follow-up was 3.4 years. Stroke types were classified as early (onset of stroke within 24 hours after revascularization), delayed (within 30 days), and late (after 30 days). Propensity score analysis showed that the incidences of early, delayed, and late stroke did not differ between PCI and OPCAB (0.65, 95% confidence interval 0.08 to 5.45, p = 1.00; 0.36, 0.10 to 1.29, p = 0.23; 0.81, 0.52 to 1.27, p = 0.72, respectively). In contrast, incidence of early stroke after on-pump CABG was higher than after OPCAB (7.22, 1.67 to 31.3, p = 0.01), but incidences of delayed and late stroke were not different (1.66, 0.70 to 3.91, p = 0.50; 1.18, 0.83 to 1.69, p = 0.73). In conclusion, occurrence of stroke was not found to differ in patients after PCI versus OPCAB regardless of onset of stroke. Occurrence of early stroke after OPCAB was lower than that after on-pump CABG, yet occurrences of delayed and late strokes were similar for the 3 revascularization strategies.

摘要

在冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)后,与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)相比,中风发生率通常较高,因为体外循环和主动脉操作通常与脑血管并发症相关。然而,越来越多的 CABG 无需体外循环(OPCAB)即可改善这些结果。在 6323 例多支血管和/或左主干冠状动脉疾病患者中,3877 例接受了 PCI,1381 例行传统体外循环 CABG,1065 例行 OPCAB。中位随访时间为 3.4 年。中风类型分为早期(血管重建后 24 小时内发作)、迟发性(30 天内)和晚期(30 天后)。倾向评分分析显示,PCI 和 OPCAB 之间早期、迟发性和晚期中风的发生率没有差异(0.65,95%置信区间 0.08 至 5.45,p=1.00;0.36,0.10 至 1.29,p=0.23;0.81,0.52 至 1.27,p=0.72)。相比之下,体外循环 CABG 后早期中风的发生率高于 OPCAB(7.22,1.67 至 31.3,p=0.01),但迟发性和晚期中风的发生率没有差异(1.66,0.70 至 3.91,p=0.50;1.18,0.83 至 1.69,p=0.73)。总之,无论中风发作时间如何,PCI 后与 OPCAB 后患者的中风发生率均无差异。OPCAB 后早期中风的发生率低于体外循环 CABG,但 3 种血运重建策略的迟发性和晚期中风发生率相似。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验