Department of Neurology, The Adelaide and Meath Hospital, incorporating the National Children's Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013 Oct;22(7):e84-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2012.07.012. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
The prevalence of ex vivo high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) to commonly prescribed antiplatelet regimens after transient ischemic attack (TIA) or ischemic stroke is uncertain.
Platelet function inhibition was simultaneously assessed with modified light transmission aggregometry (VerifyNow; Accumetrics Inc, San Diego, CA) and with a moderately high shear stress platelet function analyzer (PFA-100; Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc, Malvern, PA) in a pilot, cross-sectional study of TIA or ischemic stroke patients. Patients were assessed on aspirin-dipyridamole combination therapy (n = 51) or clopidogrel monotherapy (n = 25).
On the VerifyNow, HTPR on aspirin was identified in 4 of 51 patients (8%) on aspirin-dipyridamole combination therapy (≥ 550 aspirin reaction units on the aspirin cartridge). Eleven of 25 (44%) patients had HTPR on clopidogrel (≥ 194 P2Y12 reaction units on the P2Y12 cartridge). On the PFA-100, 21 of 51 patients (41%) on aspirin-dipyridamole combination therapy had HTPR on the collagen-epinephrine (C-EPI) cartridge. Twenty-three of 25 patients (92%) on clopidogrel had HTPR on the collagen-adenosine diphosphate (C-ADP) cartridge. The proportion of patients with antiplatelet HTPR was lower on the VerifyNow than PFA-100 in patients on both regimens (P < .001).
The prevalence of ex vivo antiplatelet HTPR after TIA or ischemic stroke is markedly influenced by the method used to assess platelet reactivity. The PFA-100 C-ADP cartridge is not sensitive at detecting the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel ex vivo. Larger prospective studies with the VerifyNow and with the PFA-100 C-EPI and recently released Innovance PFA P2Y cartridges (Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc) in addition to newer tests of platelet function are warranted to assess whether platelet function monitoring predicts clinical outcome in ischemic cerebrovascular disease.
短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)或缺血性脑卒中后,常用抗血小板方案治疗后的体外高反应性血小板(HTPR)的流行情况尚不确定。
采用改良光传输聚集仪(VerifyNow;Accumetrics Inc,圣地亚哥,加利福尼亚州)和中等剪切应力血小板功能分析仪(PFA-100;西门子医疗解决方案美国公司,马伦,宾夕法尼亚州)同时评估 TIA 或缺血性脑卒中患者的血小板功能抑制情况。在这项初步的横断面研究中,患者接受阿司匹林-双嘧达莫联合治疗(n=51)或氯吡格雷单药治疗(n=25)。
在接受阿司匹林-双嘧达莫联合治疗的 51 例患者中(n=51),有 4 例(8%)患者出现 HTPR(阿司匹林检测试剂盒的阿司匹林反应单位≥550)。25 例患者中有 11 例(44%)患者氯吡格雷 HTPR(氯吡格雷检测试剂盒的 P2Y12 反应单位≥194)。在 PFA-100 上,接受阿司匹林-双嘧达莫联合治疗的 51 例患者中(n=51),有 21 例(41%)患者 C-EPI 检测试剂盒上出现 HTPR。25 例患者中有 23 例(92%)患者 C-ADP 检测试剂盒上出现 HTPR。与 PFA-100 相比,接受两种方案治疗的患者的 VerifyNow 上抗血小板 HTPR 的比例较低(P<0.001)。
TIA 或缺血性脑卒中后体外抗血小板 HTPR 的发生率受评估血小板反应性的方法显著影响。PFA-100 C-ADP 检测试剂盒对氯吡格雷的抗血小板作用不敏感。需要更大规模的前瞻性研究,采用 VerifyNow 以及 PFA-100 C-EPI 和最近发布的 Innovance PFA P2Y 检测试剂盒(西门子医疗解决方案美国公司),并结合血小板功能的新检测方法,以评估血小板功能监测是否能预测缺血性脑血管病的临床结局。