Jover Eva, Rodríguez José M, Bernal Agustina, Arroyo Ana B, Iniesta Juan A, Guiú Isabel Sánchez, Martínez Constantino, Vicente Vicente, Lozano María L, Rivera José
aHospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca bHospital Universitario Reina Sofía cCentro Regional de Hemodonación, University of Murcia, IMIB, Murcia, Spain *Both María L. Lozano and José Rivera contributed equally to the writing of this article.
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2014 Sep;25(6):604-11. doi: 10.1097/MBC.0000000000000118.
High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR), referred to as a higher than expected platelet reactivity in patients under antiplatelet therapy, could influence outcome in cerebrovascular disease (CVD), but its prevalence and its stability over time is uncertain. Platelet reactivity was assessed in 18 patients with ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) 7 days (D7) and 90 days (D90) after prescription of clopidogrel, using four methods: light transmission aggregometry with 5 μmol/l ADP (LTA-ADP), vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP), Verify Now P2Y12 and platelet function analyzer (PFA) P2Y. HTPR was defined as LTA-ADP more than 46%; PFA-100-P2Y closure time less than 106 s; VerifyNow P2Y12, PRU greater than 235, VASP, PRI greater than 50%. Patients displayed, both at D7 and D90, a marked inhibition of platelet reactivity towards ADP in all tests as compared with reference levels. Correlations between the results obtained with all the tests at D7 and D90 and between measurements on each day in each test were low-to-moderate. The prevalence of HTPR for all the tests was 40% at D7 and 42% at D90. There was a moderate degree of agreement (k statistic < 0.5) between tests with regard to categorizing patients as HTPR/No-HTPR (D7 and D90). The on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity phenotype, HTPR/No-HTPR, remained stable in 55-72% of patients, depending on the test. A high prevalence of HTPR is found among CVD patients treated with clopidogrel and this platelet reactivity phenotype remains over time. There is poor agreement between the different platelet function tests for categorizing the platelet reactivity phenotype in these patients. The new PFA-100 P2Y equals other platelet function assays for evaluating HTPR in CVD.
高治疗期血小板反应性(HTPR),指抗血小板治疗患者中血小板反应性高于预期,可能影响脑血管疾病(CVD)的预后,但其患病率及随时间的稳定性尚不确定。在18例缺血性中风/短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)患者中,于氯吡格雷处方后7天(D7)和90天(D90)使用四种方法评估血小板反应性:5 μmol/l ADP光透射聚集法(LTA - ADP)、血管舒张刺激磷蛋白(VASP)、Verify Now P2Y12和血小板功能分析仪(PFA)P2Y。HTPR定义为:LTA - ADP超过46%;PFA - 100 - P2Y封闭时间小于106秒;VerifyNow P2Y12,PRU大于235,VASP,PRI大于50%。与参考水平相比,患者在D7和D90时,所有检测中对ADP的血小板反应性均有显著抑制。D7和D90时所有检测结果之间以及各检测中每日测量结果之间的相关性为低到中度。所有检测中HTPR的患病率在D7时为40%,在D90时为42%。在将患者分类为HTPR/非HTPR方面(D7和D90),各检测之间存在中度一致性(k统计量<0.5)。根据检测方法不同,55% - 72%的患者氯吡格雷治疗期血小板反应性表型HTPR/非HTPR保持稳定。在接受氯吡格雷治疗的CVD患者中发现HTPR患病率较高,且这种血小板反应性表型随时间持续存在。在对这些患者的血小板反应性表型进行分类时,不同血小板功能检测之间的一致性较差。新型PFA - 100 P2Y在评估CVD中的HTPR方面等同于其他血小板功能检测。