Orthopaedic Department, University of Zurich, Balgrist Hospital, Switzerland.
Arthroscopy. 2012 Nov;28(11):1622-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.04.150. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
To quantify the strength of suture fixation of knotless suture anchors in relation to the anchors' pullout strength and to compare these results with the static friction between different sutures and anchor materials.
Suture slippage within the anchor and pullout strength of 4 different knotless suture anchor models were assessed in a bovine bone model. Furthermore, the peak force before onset of slippage of different sutures trapped between increasingly loaded 4-mm rods made of commonly used anchor material (polyetheretherketone, poly-L-lactide acid, metal) was assessed.
In all but 1 of the tested anchors, there was a relevantly lower load needed for slippage of the sutures than to pull out the anchor from bone. The mean load to anchor pullout ranged between 156 and 269 N. The load to suture slippage ranged between 66 and 109 N. All sutures were better held between the metal rods (mean, 21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 19.2 to 23.3) than with polyetheretherketone rods (mean, 17; 95% CI, 15.7 to 18.1) or poly-L-lactide acid rods (mean, 18; 95% CI, 17.6 to 18.4).
In the case of suture anchors that hold the sutures by clamping, the hold of the suture in the anchor may be far lower than the pullout strength of the anchor from bone, because the sutures just slip out from the anchor through the clamping mechanism. This is well explained by the low static friction achieved between the tested sutures and the test rods made of anchor materials.
The use of knotless suture anchors appears quick and easy to perform; however, most of the anchor systems could not even reach half of the anchor pullout strength from bone before suture slippage occurred.
定量评估无结缝线锚钉缝线固定强度与锚钉拔出强度的关系,并将这些结果与不同缝线和锚钉材料之间的静摩擦力进行比较。
在牛骨模型中评估 4 种不同无结缝线锚钉模型的缝线在锚钉内的滑移以及不同缝线锚钉模型的拔出强度。此外,评估不同缝线在逐渐加载的 4mm 棒(由常用锚钉材料制成,如聚醚醚酮、聚 L-乳酸、金属)之间的峰值力,这些缝线在逐渐加载的棒之间开始滑移。
在除 1 个测试锚钉之外的所有锚钉中,缝线滑移所需的负荷明显低于从骨中拔出锚钉所需的负荷。锚钉拔出的平均负荷范围为 156 至 269N。缝线滑移的平均负荷范围为 66 至 109N。所有缝线在金属棒(平均 21;95%置信区间[CI],19.2 至 23.3)之间的固定效果均优于聚醚醚酮棒(平均 17;95%CI,15.7 至 18.1)或聚 L-乳酸棒(平均 18;95%CI,17.6 至 18.4)。
在缝线锚钉通过夹固来固定缝线的情况下,缝线在锚钉中的固定效果可能远低于缝线从骨中拔出锚钉的强度,因为缝线只是通过夹固机构从锚钉中滑出。这很好地解释了测试缝线与由锚钉材料制成的测试棒之间实现的低静摩擦力。
使用无结缝线锚钉似乎快速且易于操作;然而,在缝线开始滑移之前,大多数锚钉系统甚至无法达到从骨中拔出锚钉强度的一半。