Kim Hyungsuk, Han Sung Bin, Song Hyun Seok
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Eunpyeong Saint Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Aug 13;9(8):23259671211021820. doi: 10.1177/23259671211021820. eCollection 2021 Aug.
Compared with the single-row technique, the double-row rotator cuff repair technique is known to have a higher load to failure and a lower frequency of gap formation, leading to a lower retear rate. There are some patients with poor clinical outcomes or poor muscle strength without radiologic retear.
PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: To assess the postoperative position of suture knots via serial ultrasonography in patients who had undergone arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with the suture-bridge technique. Our hypothesis was that the suture would pull out of the lateral anchor (suture slippage), changing the positions of the medial suture knots during healing.
Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
This study included 53 patients (55 shoulders) who underwent arthroscopic suture-bridge repair and were evaluated for a minimum of 24 months. On serial ultrasonography, a straight line was drawn between the top of the greater tuberosity and the medial cortex of the anchor hole. The distances between the knots of the medial rows and the perpendicular line through the center of the anchor hole were measured in longitudinal plane images of the supraspinatus. Follow-up ultrasonography was performed at 2, 3, and 6 months postoperatively as well as at the final visit. The visual analog scale, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, the Constant score, and the University of California, Los Angeles shoulder score were recorded preoperatively and on the final follow-up.
Of the 55 shoulders, 6 developed retears at repaired sites. The mean follow-up duration was 37.5 months (range, 24-65 months). Slippage distance increased significantly over time ( < .001). The slippage at the final visit did not differ between patients with retear and no retear (13.4 mm for retear group; 10.6 mm for no retear group [ = .096]).
Suture knots of the medial row migrated medially via a suture pullout from the lateral row anchor of suture-bridge technique. Suture slippage distance did not differ significantly between retear and no retear groups.
与单排技术相比,双排肩袖修复技术已知具有更高的失效负荷和更低的间隙形成频率,从而导致更低的再撕裂率。有一些患者临床结果不佳或肌肉力量差,但影像学上没有再撕裂。
目的/假设:通过连续超声检查评估接受关节镜下肩袖缝合桥技术修复患者术后缝线结的位置。我们的假设是缝线会从外侧锚钉中拔出(缝线滑动),在愈合过程中改变内侧缝线结的位置。
病例系列;证据等级,4级。
本研究纳入了53例(55肩)接受关节镜下缝合桥修复且至少随访24个月的患者。在连续超声检查中,在大结节顶部与锚钉孔内侧皮质之间画一条直线。在冈上肌的纵向平面图像中测量内侧排结与穿过锚钉孔中心的垂线之间的距离。术后2、3和6个月以及最后一次随访时进行超声检查。术前和最后一次随访时记录视觉模拟评分、美国肩肘外科医生评分、Constant评分和加州大学洛杉矶分校肩评分。
55肩中,6肩在修复部位出现再撕裂。平均随访时间为37.5个月(范围,24 - 65个月)。滑动距离随时间显著增加(P <.001)。再撕裂患者和无再撕裂患者在最后一次随访时的滑动情况无差异(再撕裂组为13.4 mm;无再撕裂组为10.6 mm [P =.096])。
缝合桥技术中内侧排缝线结通过缝线从外侧排锚钉拔出而向内侧迁移。再撕裂组和无再撕裂组之间的缝线滑动距离无显著差异。