Department of Sexual Health, Infectious Diseases and Environmental Health, South Limburg Public Health Service, The Netherlands, P.O. Box 2022, 6160 HA Geleen, The Netherlands.
Vaccine. 2012 Nov 6;30(48):6734-7. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.08.074. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
Because non-response (<10 IU/l anti-HBs) after revaccination for hepatitis B occurs frequently (50%), this study aimed to provide evidence for a more effective revaccination regimen by comparing four different revaccinations: (1) three revaccinations with Engerix-B(®) (n=201); (2) one revaccination with Engerix-B(®) (n=37); (3) one revaccination with HBVaxPro-40(®) (n=108); (4) one revaccination with Fendrix(®) (n=39). The level of anti-HBs antibodies was determined with the AXSYM-MEIA system (Abbott, Chicago, USA). Using linear and logistic regression, the efficacy (antibody response) after the four revaccinations was compared. Analyses were corrected for age, sex, primary titre and time lag between last revaccination and the titre measurement. The height of the primary titre independently predicted antibody response. Compared to the revaccination scheme using three Engerix-B(®) doses, revaccination with a single dose of HBVaxPro-40(®) or Fendrix(®) performed significantly better. The use of these highly potent vaccines should be considered when revaccinating hepatitis B vaccine non-responders.
由于乙型肝炎疫苗加强免疫后无应答(<10IU/l 抗-HBs)的发生率较高(50%),本研究旨在通过比较四种不同的加强免疫方案,为更有效的加强免疫方案提供依据:(1)用安在时(®)进行三次加强免疫(n=201);(2)用安在时(®)进行一次加强免疫(n=37);(3)用贺维力(®)进行一次加强免疫(n=108);(4)用福尔博(®)进行一次加强免疫(n=39)。采用 AXSYM-MEIA 系统(美国雅培公司)测定抗-HBs 抗体水平。采用线性和逻辑回归比较四种加强免疫方案后的疗效(抗体反应)。分析结果校正了年龄、性别、初次滴度和上次加强免疫与滴度测量之间的时间间隔。初次滴度的高低独立预测了抗体反应。与用安在时(®)进行三次加强免疫的方案相比,用贺维力(®)或福尔博(®)进行一次加强免疫的效果明显更好。在对乙型肝炎疫苗无应答者进行加强免疫时,应考虑使用这些高效价疫苗。