• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乌拉圭的烟草控制运动:基于人群的趋势分析。

Tobacco control campaign in Uruguay: a population-based trend analysis.

机构信息

National Programme for Tobacco Control, Ministry of Public Health, Montevideo, Uruguay.

出版信息

Lancet. 2012 Nov 3;380(9853):1575-82. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60826-5. Epub 2012 Sep 14.

DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60826-5
PMID:22981904
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2005, Uruguay initiated a series of comprehensive anti-smoking measures. We aimed to assess the effect of Uruguay's anti-tobacco campaign.

METHODS

We did a population-based trend analysis, using neighbouring Argentina, which has not instituted such extensive anti-tobacco measures, as a control. We assessed three key endpoints in both countries: per-person consumption of cigarettes, as measured by tax records; the prevalence of tobacco use in adolescents, as measured by school-based surveys; and the prevalence of tobacco use in adults, as measured by nationwide household-based surveys.

FINDINGS

During 2005-11, per-person consumption of cigarettes in Uruguay decreased by 4·3% per year (95% CI 2·4 to 6·2), whereas per-person consumption in Argentina increased by 0·6% per year (-1·2 to 2·5; p=0·002 for difference in trends). During 2003-09, the 30-day prevalence of tobacco use in Uruguayan students aged 13 years, 15 years, and 17 years decreased by an estimated 8·0% per year (4·5 to 11·6), compared with a decrease of 2·5% annually (0·5 to 4·5) in Argentinian students during 2001-09 (p=0·02 for difference in trends). From 2005 to 2011, the prevalence of current tobacco use in Uruguay decreased annually by an estimated 3·3% (2·4 to 4·1), compared with an annual decrease in Argentina of 1·7% (0·8 to 2·6; p=0·02 for difference in trends).

INTERPRETATION

Uruguay's comprehensive tobacco-control campaign has been associated with a substantial, unprecedented decrease in tobacco use. Decreases in tobacco use in other low-income and middle-income countries of the magnitude seen in Uruguay would have a substantial effect on the future global burden of tobacco-related diseases.

FUNDING

J William Fulbright Foreign Scholarship Board and the US Department of State.

摘要

背景

2005 年,乌拉圭启动了一系列全面禁烟措施。我们旨在评估乌拉圭禁烟运动的效果。

方法

我们进行了一项基于人群的趋势分析,以邻国阿根廷为对照,阿根廷尚未实施如此广泛的禁烟措施。我们在这两个国家评估了三个关键终点:通过税收记录衡量的人均香烟消费量;通过基于学校的调查衡量的青少年烟草使用流行率;以及通过全国范围内基于家庭的调查衡量的成年人烟草使用流行率。

发现

在 2005 年至 2011 年间,乌拉圭的人均香烟消费量每年下降 4.3%(95%CI 2.4 至 6.2),而阿根廷的人均香烟消费量每年增长 0.6%(-1.2 至 2.5;趋势差异的 p 值=0.002)。在 2003 年至 2009 年期间,乌拉圭 13 岁、15 岁和 17 岁学生的 30 天烟草使用流行率估计每年下降 8.0%(4.5 至 11.6),而阿根廷学生的下降率为每年 2.5%(0.5 至 4.5)(趋势差异的 p 值=0.02)。从 2005 年到 2011 年,乌拉圭当前烟草使用的流行率每年估计下降 3.3%(2.4 至 4.1),而阿根廷的下降率为每年 1.7%(0.8 至 2.6;趋势差异的 p 值=0.02)。

解释

乌拉圭的全面烟草控制运动与烟草使用的大幅、前所未有的下降有关。乌拉圭所看到的烟草使用量下降幅度,如果在其他低收入和中等收入国家发生,将对未来全球与烟草相关疾病的负担产生重大影响。

资助

富布赖特外国奖学金委员会和美国国务院。

相似文献

1
Tobacco control campaign in Uruguay: a population-based trend analysis.乌拉圭的烟草控制运动:基于人群的趋势分析。
Lancet. 2012 Nov 3;380(9853):1575-82. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60826-5. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
2
Sex-stratified and age-adjusted social gradients in tobacco in Argentina and Uruguay: evidence from the Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS).阿根廷和乌拉圭烟草方面的性别分层及年龄调整后的社会梯度:来自全球成人烟草调查(GATS)的证据。
Tob Control. 2015 Nov;24(6):562-7. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051525. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
3
Gender, age, social disadvantage and quitting smoking in Argentina and Uruguay.阿根廷和乌拉圭的性别、年龄、社会劣势与戒烟情况
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2018 Mar 14;25(1):100-107. doi: 10.5604/12321966.1227646. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
4
[Smoking during pregnancy in Argentina and Uruguay].[阿根廷和乌拉圭的孕期吸烟情况]
Medicina (B Aires). 2008;68(1):48-54.
5
Premature adult mortality from non-communicable diseases (NCD) in three middle-income countries: do NCD programmes matter?三个中等收入国家非传染性疾病导致的早逝:非传染性疾病规划是否重要?
Health Policy Plan. 2012 Sep;27(6):487-98. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czr073. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
6
Youth tobacco surveillance--United States, 2001-2002.2001 - 2002年美国青少年烟草监测
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2006 May 19;55(3):1-56.
7
What impact have tobacco control policies, cigarette price and tobacco control programme funding had on Australian adolescents' smoking? Findings over a 15-year period.烟草控制政策、卷烟价格和烟草控制规划资金对澳大利亚青少年吸烟有何影响?15 年来的研究结果。
Addiction. 2011 Aug;106(8):1493-502. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03429.x. Epub 2011 Jun 21.
8
Differences by sex in tobacco use and awareness of tobacco marketing -Bangladesh, Thailand, and Uruguay, 2009.2009 年,孟加拉国、泰国和乌拉圭的性别差异与烟草使用和烟草营销意识。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010 May 28;59(20):613-8.
9
Prevalence and determinants of tobacco use among adults in Greece: 4 year trends.希腊成年人烟草使用情况及其决定因素:4年趋势
Eur J Public Health. 2013 Oct;23(5):772-6. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cks148. Epub 2012 Oct 31.
10
[Evaluation of Uruguay's antismoking campaign: progress and challenges at ten years].[乌拉圭反吸烟运动评估:十年的进展与挑战]
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2016 Oct;40(4):256-262.

引用本文的文献

1
MPOWER Tobacco Control Policies' Effects on Lip and Oral Cavity Cancer Trends in MERCOSUR Countries.MPOWER烟草控制政策对南方共同市场国家唇癌和口腔癌趋势的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Apr 19;22(4):644. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22040644.
2
Examining the Effectiveness of the 2012 Canadian Graphic Warning Label Policy Change by Sex, Income, and Education.考察 2012 年加拿大图形警示标签政策变化在性别、收入和教育方面的有效性。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2023 Mar 22;25(4):763-772. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntac235.
3
The Differential Impact of the 2000 Canadian Graphic Warning Label Policy on Smoking Prevalence by Sex and Education: A Difference-in-Difference-in-Difference Model.
2000 年加拿大图形警示标签政策对不同性别和教育程度的吸烟率的差异影响:差分差异模型。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2022 Oct 26;24(11):1732-1740. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntac122.
4
Trends of mortality due to oral and oropharyngeal cancers in Uruguay from 1997 to 2014.乌拉圭 1997 年至 2014 年口腔和口咽癌死亡率趋势。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2020 May 1;25(3):e403-e409. doi: 10.4317/medoral.23457.
5
Impact of tobacco-pack pictorial warnings on youth and young adults: A systematic review of experimental studies.烟草包装图片警示对青少年和青年的影响:实验研究的系统评价
Tob Induc Dis. 2019 May 15;17:41. doi: 10.18332/tid/108614. eCollection 2019.
6
Socio-economic inequalities in smoking prevalence and involuntary exposure to tobacco smoke in Argentina: Analysis of three cross-sectional nationally representative surveys in 2005, 2009 and 2013.阿根廷吸烟流行率和非自愿暴露于烟草烟雾的社会经济不平等:2005、2009 和 2013 年三次全国代表性横断面调查分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 7;14(6):e0217845. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217845. eCollection 2019.
7
Stroke Prevention Strategies in the Developing World.发展中世界的中风预防策略。
Stroke. 2018 Dec;49(12):3092-3097. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.017384.
8
Effects of Strengthening Cigarette Pack Warnings on Attention and Message Processing: A Systematic Review.加强香烟包装警示对注意力和信息处理的影响:一项系统综述。
Journal Mass Commun Q. 2017 Jun 1;94(2):416-442. doi: 10.1177/1077699016674188. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
9
Prevalence of non-communicable disease risk factors in three sites across Papua New Guinea: a cross-sectional study.巴布亚新几内亚三个地区非传染性疾病风险因素的患病率:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Glob Health. 2017 Jun 14;2(2):e000221. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000221. eCollection 2017.
10
Uruguayan secondary school students speak up about tobacco: results from focus group discussions in and around Montevideo.乌拉圭中学生就烟草问题发声:蒙得维的亚及其周边地区焦点小组讨论的结果。
Glob Health Promot. 2019 Jun;26(2):15-24. doi: 10.1177/1757975917703302. Epub 2017 Jul 13.