College Eisntein at Limeira, SP, Brazil.
Infant Behav Dev. 2012 Dec;35(4):645-54. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2012.07.001. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether or not blind children perseverate during a modified Piagetian A-not-B reaching task, with conditions that employ luminous AB targets and acoustic AB targets. Ten congenitally blind children, ages 1-4 years, with residual vision for light, took part in this study. Behavioral and kinematic data were computed for participants' reaches, performed in six A trials and in two B trials, in both stimulus conditions. All of the children perseverated in the luminous condition, and none of them perseverated in the condition using acoustic targets. The children tilted their heads in the direction of the target as they reached towards it. However, this coupling action (head-reaching) occurred predominantly in the A trials in the acoustic condition. In the luminous condition, in contrast to the acoustic condition, the children took longer times to initiate the reaching movement. Also, in the luminous condition, the children explored the target surroundings, unlike the acoustic condition, in which they reached straight ahead. For these blind children, sound was more relevant to reaching than was the luminous stimulus. The luminous input caused perseveration in congenitally blind children in a similar way that has been reported in the literature for typically-developing, sighted infants, ages 8-12 months, performing A-not-B tasks with visual inputs.
本研究旨在确定失明儿童在经过改良的皮亚杰 A 不 B 伸手任务中是否会出现持续反应,任务中使用了发光 AB 目标和声音 AB 目标。10 名患有先天性失明、残余光感的 1-4 岁儿童参与了这项研究。在这两种刺激条件下,对参与者在六个 A 试验和两个 B 试验中的伸手行为和运动学数据进行了计算。所有的孩子在发光条件下持续反应,而在使用声音目标的条件下则没有。孩子们在伸手去拿目标时,会朝着目标的方向倾斜头部。然而,这种耦合动作(头部和手一起伸向目标)主要发生在声音条件的 A 试验中。相比之下,在发光条件下,孩子们花更长的时间来开始伸手动作。此外,在发光条件下,孩子们会探索目标周围的环境,而在声音条件下,他们则会直接伸向目标。对于这些失明儿童来说,声音比发光刺激更能与伸手动作相关。发光输入在先天性失明儿童中引起持续反应的方式与文献中报告的 8-12 个月大、视力正常的婴儿在进行视觉输入的 A 不 B 任务时的方式相似。