Effect of the American Urological Association Annual Review course on the results of the urology qualifying examination.

PURPOSE

In this study we assess the impact of a urology dedicated review course on the scores of the corresponding board qualifying examination for attendees of the urology review course.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The ABU (American Board of Urology) Qualifying Examination scores from 2009, 2010 and 2011 were categorized into group 1 candidates who attended the AUA (American Urological Association) Annual Review Course the same year, and group 2 candidates who did not attend the AUA Annual Review Course that same year, and were compared. The scores of the preceding year's In-Service Examination were also compared for the same groups of candidates and compared to their subsequent first time taken Qualifying Examination scores.

RESULTS

There was no difference in Qualifying Examination scores of resident candidates attending vs not attending the AUA Annual Review Course in all 3 years. The overall failure rate was low, and essentially the same for all candidates in all years regardless of attendance at the AUA Annual Review Course at 2% in 2009, 2% in 2010 and 4% in 2011. Of group 1 candidates the majority (80% to 98%) considered the Annual Review Course helpful or very helpful in preparation for the Qualifying Examination.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of candidates are adequately prepared to pass their Qualifying Examination at the conclusion of their residency training program regardless of their attendance of the AUA Annual Review Course. This course may help bolster the confidence of the candidate preparing for their Qualifying Examination.