Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Genome Sciences Research Building II, 3rd Floor, 572 Research Drive, PO Box 91050, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Neuropsychologia. 2013 Jan;51(2):284-92. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.09.014. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
Healthy volunteers were tested on 7-s and 17-s peak-interval timing procedures following d-amphetamine (20mg-oral), haloperidol (2mg-oral), and placebo treatments in order to assess the dopaminergic regulation of temporal processing. Individual differences were observed in the drug effects such that two different patterns of timing behavior emerged. In the first pattern, d-amphetamine produced proportional leftward shifts of the timing functions while haloperidol produced proportional rightward shifts. This symmetrical pattern of results suggests that clock speed is regulated by the effective level of dopamine, i.e., d-amphetamine increases clock speed and haloperidol decreases clock speed. The second pattern was the opposite of the first pattern and was revealed by d-amphetamine producing proportional rightward shifts of the timing functions while haloperidol produced no reliable effect. This asymmetrical pattern of results is consistent with an explanation in which attention toward the stimulant-induced euphoria produced by d-amphetamine diminishes the attentional resources available for temporal processing, thereby diluting any drug-induced changes in clock speed. The result of increased competition and time-sharing between these two dimensions (e.g., attention towards feelings of euphoria versus attention towards the passage of time) leads to the underestimation/overproduction of temporal intervals. Interestingly, participants that displayed the 'clock-speed' pattern liked d-amphetamine significantly less than participants that displayed the 'attention' pattern and were more variable in a simple reaction time task than other participants. These results suggest that individuals with a higher degree of sensitivity to time are also more sensitive to their feelings of stimulant-induced euphoria and drug liking-suggesting that internal clock and reward pathways share common dopaminergic pathways.
健康志愿者接受了 7-s 和 17-s 峰间期定时程序测试,分别接受了苯丙胺(20mg 口服)、氟哌啶醇(2mg 口服)和安慰剂治疗,以评估多巴胺对时间处理的调节作用。在药物作用方面观察到个体差异,出现了两种不同的计时行为模式。在第一种模式中,苯丙胺使计时功能产生比例性的左移,而氟哌啶醇则产生比例性的右移。这种对称的结果模式表明,时钟速度受多巴胺有效水平的调节,即苯丙胺增加时钟速度,氟哌啶醇降低时钟速度。第二种模式与第一种模式相反,表现为苯丙胺使计时功能产生比例性的右移,而氟哌啶醇则没有产生可靠的影响。这种不对称的结果模式与一种解释一致,即对苯丙胺引起的欣快感的注意力降低了时间处理的可用注意力资源,从而稀释了任何药物引起的时钟速度变化。这两个维度(如对欣快感的注意力与对时间流逝的注意力)之间的竞争和时间共享的增加导致时间间隔的低估/过度产生。有趣的是,表现出“时钟速度”模式的参与者明显比表现出“注意力”模式的参与者更喜欢苯丙胺,并且在简单反应时间任务中的变异性比其他参与者更大。这些结果表明,对时间敏感度较高的个体对他们因兴奋剂引起的欣快感和药物喜好也更为敏感,这表明内部时钟和奖励途径共享共同的多巴胺途径。