Suppr超能文献

大转子疼痛综合征:定义临床综合征。

Greater trochanteric pain syndrome: defining the clinical syndrome.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Biology and the Environment, ANU Medical School, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.

出版信息

Br J Sports Med. 2013 Jul;47(10):649-53. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091565. Epub 2012 Sep 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Effective treatment of hip pain improves population health and quality of life. Accurate differential diagnosis is fundamental to effective treatment. The diagnostic criteria for one common hip problem, greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS) have not been well defined.

PURPOSE

To define the clinical presentation of GTPS.

METHODS

Forty-one people with GTPS, 20 with hip osteoarthritis (OA), and 23 age-matched and sex-matched asymptomatic participants (ASC) were recruited. Inclusion and exclusion criteria ensured mutually exclusive groups.

ASSESSMENT

the Harris hip score (HHS), a battery of clinical tests, and single leg stance (SLS). Participants identified the site of reproduced pain.

ANALYSIS

Fisher's exact test, analysis of variance (ANOVA) informed recursive partitioning to develop two classification trees.

RESULTS

Maximum walking distance and the ability to manipulate shoes and socks were the only HHS domains to differentiate GTPS from OA (ANOVA: p=0.010 and <0.001); OR (95% CI) of 3.47 (1.09 to 10.93) and 0.06 (0.00 to 0.26), respectively. The lateral hip pain (LHP) classification tree: (dichotomous LHP associated with a flexion abduction external rotation (FABER) test) had a mean (SE) sensitivity and specificity of 0.81 (0.019) and 0.82 (0.044), respectively. A non-specific hip pain classification tree had a mean (SE) sensitivity and specificity of 0.78 (0.058) and 0.28 (0.080).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with LHP in the absence of difficulty with manipulating shoes and socks, together with pain on palpation of the greater trochanter and LHP with a FABER test are likely to have GTPS.

摘要

背景

有效治疗髋痛可改善人群健康和生活质量。准确的鉴别诊断是有效治疗的基础。一种常见髋部问题,即大转子疼痛综合征(GTPS)的诊断标准尚未得到很好的定义。

目的

明确 GTPS 的临床表现。

方法

共纳入 41 例 GTPS 患者、20 例髋骨关节炎(OA)患者和 23 名年龄和性别匹配的无症状参与者(ASC)。纳入和排除标准确保了各组之间互不重叠。

评估

采用 Harris 髋关节评分(HHS)、一系列临床检查和单腿站立(SLS)。参与者识别疼痛再现的部位。

分析

采用 Fisher 精确检验、方差分析(ANOVA)和递归分区,以建立两个分类树。

结果

最大步行距离和穿脱鞋袜的能力是区分 GTPS 与 OA 的唯一 HHS 域(ANOVA:p=0.010 和 <0.001);OR(95%CI)分别为 3.47(1.09 至 10.93)和 0.06(0.00 至 0.26)。髋关节外侧疼痛(LHP)分类树:(与 FABER 试验相关的二分 LHP)的平均(SE)敏感性和特异性分别为 0.81(0.019)和 0.82(0.044)。非特异性髋痛分类树的平均(SE)敏感性和特异性分别为 0.78(0.058)和 0.28(0.080)。

结论

无穿脱鞋袜困难且伴有大转子压痛和 FABER 试验阳性的 LHP 患者,可能患有 GTPS。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验