Department of Genetic Medicine and Development, University of Geneva Medical School and iGE3 Institute of Genetics and Genomics of Geneva, Switzerland.
Mol Biol Evol. 2013 Feb;30(2):347-55. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mss219. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
The mammalian mitochondrial genomes differ from the nuclear genomes by maternal inheritance, absence of recombination, and higher mutation rate. All these differences decrease the effective population size of mitochondrial genome and make it more susceptible to accumulation of slightly deleterious mutations. It was hypothesized that mitochondrial genes, especially in species with low effective population size, irreversibly degrade leading to decrease of organismal fitness and even to extinction of species through the mutational meltdown. To interrogate this hypothesis, we compared the purifying selections acting on the representative set of mitochondrial (potentially degrading) and nuclear (potentially not degrading) protein-coding genes in species with different effective population size. For 21 mammalian species, we calculated the ratios of accumulation of slightly deleterious mutations approximated by Kn/Ks separately for mitochondrial and nuclear genomes. The 75% of variation in Kn/Ks is explained by two independent variables: type of a genome (mitochondrial or nuclear) and effective population size of species approximated by generation time. First, we observed that purifying selection is more effective in mitochondria than in the nucleus that implies strong evolutionary constraints of mitochondrial genome. Mitochondrial de novo nonsynonymous mutations have at least 5-fold more harmful effect when compared with nuclear. Second, Kn/Ks of mitochondrial and nuclear genomes is positively correlated with generation time of species, indicating relaxation of purifying selection with decrease of species-specific effective population size. Most importantly, the linear regression lines of mitochondrial and nuclear Kn/Ks's from generation times of species are parallel, indicating congruent relaxation of purifying selection in both genomes. Thus, our results reveal that the distribution of selection coefficients of de novo nonsynonymous mitochondrial mutations has a similar shape with the distribution of de novo nonsynonymous nuclear mutations, but its mean is five times smaller. The harmful effect of mitochondrial de novo nonsynonymous mutations triggers highly effective purifying selection, which maintains the fitness of the mammalian mitochondrial genome.
哺乳动物的线粒体基因组与核基因组不同,其具有母系遗传、无重组和更高的突变率等特点。所有这些差异都会降低线粒体基因组的有效种群大小,使其更容易积累轻微有害的突变。有人假设,线粒体基因,尤其是在有效种群大小较低的物种中,会不可逆转地退化,导致生物适应性下降,甚至通过突变崩溃导致物种灭绝。为了检验这一假说,我们比较了不同有效种群大小的物种中具有代表性的线粒体(潜在退化)和核(潜在非退化)蛋白编码基因所受到的选择压力。对于 21 种哺乳动物,我们分别计算了线粒体和核基因组中积累的轻微有害突变的 Kn/Ks 比值。Kn/Ks 的 75%变化可以用两个独立变量来解释:基因组的类型(线粒体或核)和物种的有效种群大小(用世代时间来近似)。首先,我们观察到,与核基因组相比,线粒体基因组的净化选择更为有效,这意味着线粒体基因组具有较强的进化约束。与核基因组相比,线粒体新产生的非同义突变至少有 5 倍的危害性。其次,线粒体和核基因组的 Kn/Ks 与物种的世代时间呈正相关,这表明随着物种特定有效种群大小的降低,净化选择放松。最重要的是,来自物种世代时间的线粒体和核 Kn/Ks 的线性回归线是平行的,这表明两个基因组的净化选择都有一致的放松。因此,我们的研究结果揭示了,新产生的线粒体非同义突变的选择系数分布与新产生的核非同义突变的分布具有相似的形状,但平均值小 5 倍。线粒体新产生的非同义突变的危害性触发了高度有效的净化选择,从而维持了哺乳动物线粒体基因组的适应性。