• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人类合作行为的性选择:塞内加尔农村的一项实验研究。

Sexual selection of human cooperative behaviour: an experimental study in rural Senegal.

机构信息

University of Montpellier 2, Montpellier, France.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44403. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044403. Epub 2012 Sep 12.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0044403
PMID:22984503
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3440379/
Abstract

Human cooperation in large groups and between non-kin individuals remains a Darwinian puzzle. Investigations into whether and how sexual selection is involved in the evolution of cooperation represent a new and important research direction. Here, 69 groups of four men or four women recruited from a rural population in Senegal played a sequential public-good game in the presence of out-group observers, either of the same sex or of the opposite sex. At the end of the game, participants could donate part of their gain to the village school in the presence of the same observers. Both contributions to the public good and donations to the school, which reflect different components of cooperativeness, were influenced by the sex of the observers. The results suggest that in this non-Western population, sexual selection acts mainly on men's cooperative behaviour with non-kin, whereas women's cooperativeness is mainly influenced by nonsexual social selection.

摘要

人类在大群体中的合作以及非亲属个体之间的合作仍然是一个达尔文式的难题。调查性选择是否以及如何参与合作的进化,代表了一个新的和重要的研究方向。在这里,从塞内加尔农村招募的 69 组四男或四女在局外观察者(同性或异性)在场的情况下,进行了一系列的公共物品博弈。在游戏结束时,参与者可以在同一批观察者在场的情况下,将部分收益捐赠给村里的学校。对公共物品的贡献和对学校的捐赠,反映了合作的不同组成部分,都受到观察者性别的影响。结果表明,在这个非西方人群中,性选择主要作用于男性与非亲属的合作行为,而女性的合作行为主要受到非性社会选择的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4e6/3440379/72e0654410e4/pone.0044403.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4e6/3440379/f6201bf3402c/pone.0044403.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4e6/3440379/56a18521f4d7/pone.0044403.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4e6/3440379/72e0654410e4/pone.0044403.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4e6/3440379/f6201bf3402c/pone.0044403.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4e6/3440379/56a18521f4d7/pone.0044403.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4e6/3440379/72e0654410e4/pone.0044403.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Sexual selection of human cooperative behaviour: an experimental study in rural Senegal.人类合作行为的性选择:塞内加尔农村的一项实验研究。
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44403. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044403. Epub 2012 Sep 12.
2
Men increase contributions to a public good when under sexual competition.当男性处于性竞争下时,他们会增加对公共物品的贡献。
Sci Rep. 2016 Jul 14;6:29819. doi: 10.1038/srep29819.
3
Assortative mating based on cooperativeness and generosity.基于合作性和慷慨大方的选择性交配。
J Evol Biol. 2014 May;27(5):975-81. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12346. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
4
Knowledge, attitudes and perception of AIDS in rural Senegal: relationship to sexual behaviour and behaviour change.塞内加尔农村地区对艾滋病的认知、态度和看法:与性行为及行为改变的关系
AIDS. 1996 Mar;10(3):327-34. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199603000-00012.
5
New perspectives on the evolution of women's cooperation.关于女性合作进化的新视角。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Jan 16;378(1868):20210424. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0424. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
6
Gender-based pairings influence cooperative expectations and behaviours.性别配对影响合作期望和行为。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 23;10(1):1041. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-57749-6.
7
Men behaving nicely: public goods as peacock tails.表现良好的男性:公共物品如同孔雀的尾巴。
Br J Psychol. 2013 Feb;104(1):3-13. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02093.x. Epub 2012 Feb 1.
8
Altruism may arise from individual selection.利他主义可能源于个体选择。
J Theor Biol. 2005 Jul 21;235(2):233-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.01.006. Epub 2005 Mar 5.
9
Sexual networks in Uganda: mixing patterns between a trading town, its rural hinterland and a nearby fishing village.乌干达的性网络:一个贸易城镇、其农村腹地与附近渔村之间的交往模式。
Int J STD AIDS. 1997 Aug;8(8):495-500. doi: 10.1258/0956462971920640.
10
Reliability of reports of sexual behavior: a study of married couples in rural west Africa.性行为报告的可靠性:对西非农村已婚夫妇的一项研究。
Am J Epidemiol. 1995 Jun 15;141(12):1194-200. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117393.

引用本文的文献

1
Is provisioning rate of parents and helpers influenced by the simulated presence of novel individuals?父母和帮手的供给率是否受到新个体模拟出现的影响?
Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2025;79(1):14. doi: 10.1007/s00265-024-03548-2. Epub 2025 Jan 15.
2
No good deed goes unpunished: the social costs of prosocial behaviour.善有恶报:亲社会行为的社会成本。
Evol Hum Sci. 2021 Jul 21;3:e40. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2021.35. eCollection 2021.
3
Female cooperation: evolutionary, cross-cultural and ethnographic evidence.女性合作:进化、跨文化和民族志证据。

本文引用的文献

1
Men behaving nicely: public goods as peacock tails.表现良好的男性:公共物品如同孔雀的尾巴。
Br J Psychol. 2013 Feb;104(1):3-13. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02093.x. Epub 2012 Feb 1.
2
Hormonal mechanisms for regulation of aggression in human coalitions.人类群体中攻击行为的激素调节机制。
Hum Nat. 2012 Mar;23(1):68-88. doi: 10.1007/s12110-012-9135-y.
3
Demography and ecology drive variation in cooperation across human populations.人口统计学和生态学驱动着人类群体间合作的变化。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Jan 16;378(1868):20210425. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0425. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
4
The prosociality of married people: Evidence from a large multinational sample.已婚人士的亲社会行为:来自大型跨国样本的证据。
J Econ Psychol. 2022 Oct;92:102545. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2022.102545. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
5
Looking Like a Million Dollars: Does Attractiveness Priming Increase Altruistic Behavior in Experimental Games?看起来身价百万:吸引力启动效应会增加实验游戏中的利他行为吗?
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 20;12:658466. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.658466. eCollection 2021.
6
To help or punish in the face of unfairness: men and women prefer mutually-beneficial strategies over punishment in a sexual selection context.在面对不公时选择帮助还是惩罚:在性选择背景下,男性和女性更倾向于互利策略而非惩罚。
R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Sep 4;6(9):181441. doi: 10.1098/rsos.181441. eCollection 2019 Sep.
7
Men increase contributions to a public good when under sexual competition.当男性处于性竞争下时,他们会增加对公共物品的贡献。
Sci Rep. 2016 Jul 14;6:29819. doi: 10.1038/srep29819.
8
Provision or good genes? Menstrual cycle shifts in women's preferences for short-term and long-term mates' altruistic behavior.是资源提供还是优良基因?女性在月经周期中对短期和长期伴侣利他行为偏好的变化。
Evol Psychol. 2014 Oct 23;12(5):888-900. doi: 10.1177/147470491401200503.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Aug 30;108(35):14426-30. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1105186108. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
4
Biological markets.生物市场。
Trends Ecol Evol. 1995 Aug;10(8):336-9. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(00)89123-5.
5
Conditional cooperation and costly monitoring explain success in forest commons management.有条件的合作和昂贵的监督解释了森林公地管理的成功。
Science. 2010 Nov 12;330(6006):961-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1193649.
6
Cooperators benefit through reputation-based partner choice in economic games.合作者通过基于声誉的经济博弈中的伙伴选择而受益。
Biol Lett. 2010 Oct 23;6(5):659-62. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0209. Epub 2010 Apr 21.
7
Culture and the evolution of human cooperation.文化与人类合作的进化。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Nov 12;364(1533):3281-8. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0134.
8
Ritual fights and male reproductive success in a human population.人类群体中的仪式性争斗与男性生殖成功
J Evol Biol. 2009 Sep;22(9):1854-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01793.x. Epub 2009 Jul 3.
9
Do humans prefer altruistic mates? Testing a link between sexual selection and altruism towards non-relatives.人类更喜欢利他主义的配偶吗?检验性选择与对非亲属利他行为之间的联系。
Br J Psychol. 2008 Nov;99(Pt 4):555-72. doi: 10.1348/000712608X298467.
10
Evolutionary explanations for cooperation.合作的进化解释。
Curr Biol. 2007 Aug 21;17(16):R661-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.004.