Suppr超能文献

边缘型人格障碍和躯体形式障碍中的功能失调性情绪调节。

Dysfunctional affect regulation in borderline personality disorder and in somatoform disorder.

机构信息

Delta Psychiatric Hospital, Poortugaal, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2012;3. doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v3i0.19566. Epub 2012 Sep 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although affect dysregulation is considered a core component of borderline personality disorder (BPD) and somatoform disorders (SoD), remarkably little research has focused on the prevalence and nature of affect dysregulation in these disorders. Also, despite apparent similarities, little is known about how dysfunctional under- and overregulation of affect and positive and negative somatoform and psychoform dissociative experiences inter-relate. Prior studies suggest a clear relationship between early childhood psychological trauma and affect dysregulation, especially when the caretaker is emotionally, sexually, or physically abusing the child, but how these relate to under- and overregulation while differentiating for developmental epochs is not clear. Although an elevated risk of childhood trauma exposure or complex posttraumatic stress disorder (CPTSD) symptoms has been reported in BPD and SoD, trauma histories, dysfunctional affect regulation, dissociation, PTSD, and CPTSD were never assessed in unison in BPD and/or SoD.

METHOD

BPD and/or SoD diagnoses were confirmed or ruled out in 472 psychiatric inpatients using clinical interviews. Dysfunctional under- and overregulation of affect and somatoform and psychoform dissociation, childhood trauma-by-primary-caretaker (TPC), PTSD, and CPTSD were all measured using self reports.

RESULTS

No disorder-specific form of dysfunctional affect regulation was found. Although both BPD and SoD can involve affect dysregulation and dissociation, there is a wide range of intensity of dysfunctional regulation phenomena in patients with these diagnoses. Evidence was found for the existence of three qualitatively different forms of experiencing states: inhibitory experiencing states (overregulation of affect and negative psychoform dissociation) most commonly found in SoD, excitatory experiencing states (underregulation of affect and positive psychoform dissociation) most commonly found in BPD, and combination of inhibitory and excitatory experiencing states commonly occurring in comorbid BPD+SoD. Almost two-thirds of participants reported having experienced childhood TPC. Underregulation of affect was associated with emotional TPC and TPC occurring in developmental epoch, 0-6 years of age. Overregulation of affect was associated with physical TPC. Almost a quarter of all participants met the criteria for CPTSD. BPD+SoD patients had the most extensive childhood trauma histories and were most likely to meet CPTSD criteria, followed by BPD, psychiatric comparison (PC), and SoD. The BPD+SoD and BPD reported significantly higher levels of CPTSD than the SoD or PC groups but did not differ from each other except for greater severity of CPTSD somatic symptoms by the BPD+SoD group.

CONCLUSION

THREE QUALITATIVELY DIFFERENT FORMS OF DYSFUNCTIONAL REGULATION WERE IDENTIFIED: inhibitory, excitatory, and combined inhibitory and excitatory states. Distinguishing inhibitory versus excitatory states of experiencing may help to clarify differences in dissociation and affect dysregulation between and within BPD and SoD patients. Specific interventions addressing overregulation in BPD, or underregulation in SoD, should be added to disorder-specific evidence-based treatments. CPT is particularly prevalent in BPD and BPD+SoD and is differentially associated with under- and overregulation of affect depending on the type of traumatic exposure. CPTSD warrants further investigation as a potential independent syndrome or as a marker identifying a sub-group of affectively, or both affectively and somatically, dysregulated patients diagnosed with BPD who have childhood trauma histories.

摘要

背景

尽管情绪调节障碍被认为是边缘型人格障碍(BPD)和躯体形式障碍(SoD)的核心组成部分,但令人惊讶的是,很少有研究关注这些障碍中情绪调节障碍的患病率和性质。此外,尽管存在明显的相似之处,但对于情绪和积极及消极躯体形式和心理形式解离的功能失调的调节和过度调节之间如何相互关联,知之甚少。先前的研究表明,早期儿童心理创伤与情绪调节障碍之间存在明确的关系,尤其是当看护人在情感、性或身体上虐待孩子时,但如何在区分发展阶段的同时将这些与调节和过度调节联系起来尚不清楚。尽管 BPD 和 SoD 中报告了童年创伤暴露或复杂创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD)症状的风险增加,但在 BPD 和/或 SoD 中从未同时评估过创伤史、功能失调的情绪调节、解离、创伤后应激障碍和 CPTSD。

方法

使用临床访谈确认或排除 472 名精神科住院患者的 BPD 和/或 SoD 诊断。使用自我报告测量功能失调的情绪调节和躯体形式和心理形式的解离、儿童期与主要看护者的创伤(TPC)、创伤后应激障碍和 CPTSD。

结果

未发现特定于疾病的功能失调的情绪调节形式。尽管 BPD 和 SoD 都可能涉及情绪调节障碍和解离,但这些诊断患者的功能失调调节现象的强度范围很广。有证据表明存在三种不同的体验状态形式:抑制性体验状态(情绪和消极心理形式解离的过度调节)在 SoD 中最常见,兴奋性体验状态(情绪和积极心理形式解离的调节不足)在 BPD 中最常见,以及在 BPD+SoD 中常见的抑制性和兴奋性体验状态的组合。几乎三分之二的参与者报告了儿童时期的 TPC。情绪调节不足与情感 TPC 和发生在发育阶段(0-6 岁)的 TPC 有关。情绪调节过度与身体 TPC 有关。几乎四分之一的参与者符合 CPTSD 的标准。BPD+SoD 患者的童年创伤史最广泛,最有可能符合 CPTSD 标准,其次是 BPD、精神病比较(PC)和 SoD。BPD+SoD 和 BPD 报告的 CPTSD 水平明显高于 SoD 或 PC 组,但除了 BPD+SoD 组的 CPTSD 躯体症状严重程度更高外,两组之间没有差异。

结论

识别出三种不同的功能失调调节形式:抑制性、兴奋性和抑制性与兴奋性相结合的状态。区分体验的抑制性与兴奋性状态可能有助于澄清 BPD 和 SoD 患者之间以及患者内部的解离和情绪调节障碍的差异。应在针对特定疾病的循证治疗中添加针对 BPD 的过度调节或针对 SoD 的调节不足的特定干预措施。CPT 在 BPD 和 BPD+SoD 中尤为普遍,并且根据创伤暴露的类型,与情绪的过度或不足调节相关。CPTSD 值得进一步研究,作为一种潜在的独立综合征或作为一种标记,识别出有情绪障碍或同时有情绪和躯体障碍的 BPD 患者的亚组,这些患者有童年创伤史。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验