• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用认知评估系统对美国和意大利儿童进行 PASS 理论智力测试的表现进行多群组验证性因素分析。

Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis of U.S. and Italian children's performance on the PASS theory of intelligence as measured by the Cognitive Assessment System.

机构信息

Curry School of Education, University of Virginia, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Assess. 2013 Mar;25(1):157-66. doi: 10.1037/a0029828. Epub 2012 Sep 17.

DOI:10.1037/a0029828
PMID:22984802
Abstract

This study examined Italian and U.S. children's performance on the English and Italian versions, respectively, of the Cognitive Assessment System (CAS; Naglieri & Conway, 2009; Naglieri & Das, 1997), a test based on a neurocognitive theory of intelligence entitled PASS (Planning, Attention, Simultaneous, and Successive; Naglieri & Das, 1997; Naglieri & Otero, 2011). CAS subtest, PASS scales, and Full Scale scores for Italian (N=809) and U.S. (N=1,174) samples, matched by age and gender, were examined. Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis results supported the configural invariance of the CAS factor structure between Italians and Americans for the 5- to 7-year-old (root-mean-square error of approximation [RMSEA]=.038; 90% confidence interval [CI]=.033, .043; comparative fit index [CFI]=.96) and 8- to 18-year-old (RMSEA=.036; 90% CI=.028, .043; CFI=.97) age groups. The Full Scale standard scores (using the U.S. norms) for the Italian (100.9) and U.S. (100.5) samples were nearly identical. The scores between the samples for the PASS scales were very similar, except for the Attention Scale (d=0.26), where the Italian sample's mean score was slightly higher. Negligible mean differences were found for 9 of the 13 subtest scores, 3 showed small d-ratios (2 in favor of the Italian sample), and 1 was large (in favor of the U.S. sample), but some differences in subtest variances were found. These findings suggest that the PASS theory, as measured by CAS, yields similar mean scores and showed factorial invariance for these samples of Italian and American children, who differ on cultural and linguistic characteristics.

摘要

本研究考察了意大利和美国儿童在认知评估系统(CAS;Naglieri 和 Conway,2009;Naglieri 和 Das,1997)的英语和意大利语版本上的表现,该测试基于一种名为 PASS(计划、注意、同时、连续;Naglieri 和 Das,1997;Naglieri 和 Otero,2011)的神经认知智力理论。对按年龄和性别匹配的意大利(N=809)和美国(N=1,174)样本的 CAS 子测试、PASS 量表和全量表得分进行了检验。多组验证性因素分析结果支持了意大利人和美国人之间 CAS 因素结构的组态不变性,适用于 5 至 7 岁(近似均方根误差 [RMSEA]=.038;90%置信区间 [CI]=.033,.043;拟合优度指数 [CFI]=.96)和 8 至 18 岁(RMSEA=.036;90% CI=.028,.043;CFI=.97)年龄组。意大利(100.9)和美国(100.5)样本的全量表标准分数(使用美国常模)非常接近。样本之间 PASS 量表的得分非常相似,除了注意力量表(d=0.26),意大利样本的平均得分略高。13 个子测试分数中的 9 个分数存在微不足道的均值差异,3 个分数显示较小的 d-比值(2 个有利于意大利样本),1 个分数较大(有利于美国样本),但发现了一些子测试方差的差异。这些发现表明,作为 PASS 理论的衡量标准,CAS 产生了类似的平均分数,并对这些具有文化和语言差异的意大利和美国儿童样本表现出因素不变性。

相似文献

1
Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis of U.S. and Italian children's performance on the PASS theory of intelligence as measured by the Cognitive Assessment System.采用认知评估系统对美国和意大利儿童进行 PASS 理论智力测试的表现进行多群组验证性因素分析。
Psychol Assess. 2013 Mar;25(1):157-66. doi: 10.1037/a0029828. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
2
The neurocognitive assessment of Hispanic English-language learners with reading failure.对有阅读障碍的西班牙裔英语学习者的神经认知评估。
Appl Neuropsychol Child. 2013;2(1):24-32. doi: 10.1080/21622965.2012.670547. Epub 2012 May 1.
3
International collaborative study of intracytoplasmic sperm injection-conceived, in vitro fertilization-conceived, and naturally conceived 5-year-old child outcomes: cognitive and motor assessments.胞浆内单精子注射受孕、体外受精受孕及自然受孕5岁儿童结局的国际合作研究:认知与运动评估
Pediatrics. 2005 Mar;115(3):e283-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1445.
4
Assessing measurement invariance of the children's depression inventory in Chinese and Italian primary school student samples.评估儿童抑郁量表在中、意两国小学生样本中的测量不变性。
Assessment. 2012 Dec;19(4):506-16. doi: 10.1177/1073191111421286. Epub 2011 Sep 12.
5
A national study on the development of visual attention using the cognitive assessment system.一项使用认知评估系统研究视觉注意力发展的全国性研究。
J Atten Disord. 2010 Jul;14(1):15-24. doi: 10.1177/1087054709332473. Epub 2009 Apr 20.
6
[PASS neurocognitive dysfunction in attention deficit].[注意力缺陷中的PASS神经认知功能障碍]
Rev Neurol. 2001;32(1):30-7.
7
Latent factor structure of the Das-Naglieri Cognitive Assessment System: a confirmatory factor analysis in a Chinese setting.《Das-Naglieri 认知评估系统的潜在因子结构:中国情境下的验证性因子分析》。
Res Dev Disabil. 2011 Sep-Oct;32(5):1988-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.04.005. Epub 2011 May 14.
8
Exploratory and higher order factor analysis of the WJ-III full test battery: a school-aged analysis.韦氏智力量表第三版成套测验的探索性和高阶因子分析:学龄期分析。
Psychol Assess. 2013 Jun;25(2):442-55. doi: 10.1037/a0031335. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
9
Utility of the PASS theory and cognitive assessment system for Dutch children with and without ADHD.PASS理论和认知评估系统对荷兰患和未患注意力缺陷多动障碍儿童的效用。
J Learn Disabil. 2005 Sep-Oct;38(5):434-9. doi: 10.1177/00222194050380050601.
10
Construct Validity and Diagnostic Utility of the Cognitive Assessment System for ADHD.注意缺陷多动障碍认知评估系统的结构效度与诊断效用
J Atten Disord. 2016 Jun;20(6):519-29. doi: 10.1177/1087054713489021. Epub 2013 Jun 11.

引用本文的文献

1
PASS Theory of Intelligence and Its Measurement Using the Cognitive Assessment System, 2nd Edition.《智力的PASS理论及其使用认知评估系统的测量(第二版)》
J Intell. 2024 Aug 6;12(8):77. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12080077.
2
Cross-National Generalizability of WISC-V and CHC Broad Ability Constructs across France, Spain, and the US.韦氏儿童智力量表第五版(WISC-V)与卡特尔-霍恩-卡罗尔(CHC)广义能力结构在法国、西班牙和美国的跨国通用性
J Intell. 2023 Aug 7;11(8):159. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11080159.
3
The Structure of Speed of Processing Across Cultures.
跨文化背景下加工速度的结构
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2018 Sep 30;14(3):112-125. doi: 10.5709/acp-0243-7. eCollection 2018.
4
COGNITIVE MODIFICATION IN STUDENTS WITH READING PROBLEMS AND ADHD-CT.对有阅读问题和注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD-CT)的学生进行认知矫正。
Rev Puertorriquena Psicol. 2018 Jul-Dec;29(2):302-315.
5
Brief report: cognitive performance in autism and Asperger's syndrome: what are the differences?简要报告:自闭症和艾斯伯格综合征患者的认知表现:有何差异?
J Autism Dev Disord. 2013 Dec;43(12):2977-83. doi: 10.1007/s10803-013-1828-5.