• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“伤患军人重返社区电脑适应测验(CRIS-CAT)的信度、效度与行政负担”。

Reliability, validity and administrative burden of the community reintegration of injured service members computer adaptive test (CRIS-CAT)".

机构信息

Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI 02908, USA.

出版信息

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Sep 17;12:145. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-145.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2288-12-145
PMID:22984850
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3528459/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Computer Adaptive Test version of the Community Reintegration of Injured Service Members measure (CRIS-CAT) consists of three scales measuring Extent of, Perceived Limitations in, and Satisfaction with community integration. The CRIS-CAT was developed using item response theory methods. The purposes of this study were to assess the reliability, concurrent, known group and predictive validity and respondent burden of the CRIS-CAT.The CRIS-CAT was developed using item response theory methods. The purposes of this study were to assess the reliability, concurrent, known group and predictive validity and respondent burden of the CRIS-CAT.

METHODS

This was a three-part study that included a 1) a cross-sectional field study of 517 homeless, employed, and Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom (OEF/OIF) Veterans; who completed all items in the CRIS item set, 2) a cohort study with one year follow-up study of 135 OEF/OIF Veterans, and 3) a 50-person study of CRIS-CAT administration. Conditional reliability of simulated CAT scores was calculated from the field study data, and concurrent validity and known group validity were examined using Pearson product correlations and ANOVAs. Data from the cohort were used to examine the ability of the CRIS-CAT to predict key one year outcomes. Data from the CRIS-CAT administration study were used to calculate ICC (2,1) minimum detectable change (MDC), and average number of items used during CAT administration.

RESULTS

Reliability scores for all scales were above 0.75, but decreased at both ends of the score continuum. CRIS-CAT scores were correlated with concurrent validity indicators and differed significantly between the three Veteran groups (P < .001). The odds of having any Emergency Room visits were reduced for Veterans with better CRIS-CAT scores (Extent, Perceived Satisfaction respectively: OR = 0.94, 0.93, 0.95; P < .05). CRIS-CAT scores were predictive of SF-12 physical and mental health related quality of life scores at the 1 year follow-up. Scales had ICCs >0.9. MDCs were 5.9, 6.2, and 3.6, respectively for Extent, Perceived and Satisfaction subscales. Number of items (mn, SD) administered at Visit 1 were 14.6 (3.8) 10.9 (2.7) and 10.4 (1.7) respectively for Extent, Perceived and Satisfaction subscales.

CONCLUSION

The CRIS-CAT demonstrated sound measurement properties including reliability, construct, known group and predictive validity, and it was administered with minimal respondent burden. These findings support the use of this measure in assessing community reintegration.

摘要

背景

社区伤兵重返社会适应度测试版(CRIS-CAT)的计算机自适应测试版由三个量表组成,分别测量社区融入的程度、感知限制和满意度。CRIS-CAT 是使用项目反应理论方法开发的。本研究的目的是评估 CRIS-CAT 的可靠性、同时效度、已知组和预测效度以及受访者负担。

方法

这是一项三部分的研究,包括 1)对 517 名无家可归、就业和持久自由/伊拉克自由行动(OEF/OIF)退伍军人进行的横断面现场研究;他们完成了 CRIS 项目集中的所有项目,2)对 135 名 OEF/OIF 退伍军人进行了为期一年的随访研究,3)对 50 名 CRIS-CAT 管理进行了研究。使用现场研究数据计算模拟 CAT 分数的条件可靠性,并使用 Pearson 产品相关性和 ANOVA 检查同时效度和已知组有效性。队列数据用于检验 CRIS-CAT 预测关键一年结果的能力。CRIS-CAT 管理研究的数据用于计算 ICC(2,1)最小可检测变化(MDC)和 CAT 管理过程中使用的平均项目数量。

结果

所有量表的可靠性得分均高于 0.75,但在得分连续体的两端均有所下降。CRIS-CAT 得分与同时效度指标相关,并且在三个退伍军人组之间存在显著差异(P<.001)。CRIS-CAT 得分较高的退伍军人急诊就诊的可能性降低(程度、感知满意度分别为:OR=0.94,0.93,0.95;P<.05)。CRIS-CAT 得分可预测 SF-12 生理和心理健康相关生活质量评分在 1 年随访时的得分。各量表的 ICC 均大于 0.9。MDC 分别为 5.9、6.2 和 3.6,分别为程度、感知和满意度分量表。在第 1 次就诊时,项目数量(mn,SD)分别为 14.6(3.8)、10.9(2.7)和 10.4(1.7),分别为程度、感知和满意度分量表。

结论

CRIS-CAT 表现出良好的测量特性,包括可靠性、结构、已知组和预测效度,且受访者负担最小。这些发现支持在评估社区重新融入方面使用该措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c65c/3528459/f36a10a74d9e/1471-2288-12-145-6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c65c/3528459/684cdf889471/1471-2288-12-145-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c65c/3528459/5f32046d3ea1/1471-2288-12-145-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c65c/3528459/5d8ac33f116d/1471-2288-12-145-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c65c/3528459/fb16ae2ed785/1471-2288-12-145-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c65c/3528459/0e2c46521605/1471-2288-12-145-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c65c/3528459/f36a10a74d9e/1471-2288-12-145-6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c65c/3528459/684cdf889471/1471-2288-12-145-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c65c/3528459/5f32046d3ea1/1471-2288-12-145-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c65c/3528459/5d8ac33f116d/1471-2288-12-145-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c65c/3528459/fb16ae2ed785/1471-2288-12-145-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c65c/3528459/0e2c46521605/1471-2288-12-145-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c65c/3528459/f36a10a74d9e/1471-2288-12-145-6.jpg

相似文献

1
Reliability, validity and administrative burden of the community reintegration of injured service members computer adaptive test (CRIS-CAT)".“伤患军人重返社区电脑适应测验(CRIS-CAT)的信度、效度与行政负担”。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Sep 17;12:145. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-145.
2
Measurement of community reintegration in sample of severely wounded servicemembers.重伤军人样本中社区重新融入情况的测量。
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(2):89-102. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2010.04.0070.
3
Computer-adaptive test to measure community reintegration of Veterans.用于测量退伍军人社区重新融入情况的计算机自适应测试。
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(4):557-66. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2011.04.0081.
4
Development of CRIS: measure of community reintegration of injured service members.CRIS的发展:受伤军人社区重新融入的衡量标准。
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2009;46(4):469-80. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2008.07.0082.
5
Telephone and face to face methods of assessment of veteran's community reintegration yield equivalent results.电话和面对面的评估方法对退伍军人的社区融入评估结果等效。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Jun 25;11:98. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-98.
6
Feasibility of a Skills-Based Group Reintegration Workshop for OEF/OIF Veterans: STEP-Home.面向伊拉克自由行动/持久自由行动退伍军人的基于技能的小组重新融入研讨会的可行性:STEP-Home。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2018 Jul/Aug;33(4):E17-E23. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000362.
7
Neuropsychological functioning, neurobehavioral symptoms, and community reintegration in unstably housed veterans with mental health conditions.不稳定住房的心理健康状况退伍军人的神经心理学功能、神经行为症状和社区融入。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2023 Nov;37(8):1728-1744. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2023.2176364. Epub 2023 Feb 11.
8
Prevalence and correlates of suicidal ideation among Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom veterans.作战持久自由和伊拉克自由行动老兵自杀意念的流行率及其相关因素。
J Affect Disord. 2013 Jul;149(1-3):291-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.01.043. Epub 2013 Mar 24.
9
A retrospective cohort study of U.S. service members returning from Afghanistan and Iraq: is physical health worsening over time?美国从阿富汗和伊拉克回国的军人的回顾性队列研究:随着时间的推移,他们的身体健康状况是否在恶化?
BMC Public Health. 2012 Dec 28;12:1124. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1124.
10
Deployment risk and resilience inventory-2 (DRRI-2): an updated tool for assessing psychosocial risk and resilience factors among service members and veterans.部署风险和弹性清单-2(DRRI-2):一种用于评估军人和退伍军人心理社会风险和弹性因素的更新工具。
J Trauma Stress. 2013 Dec;26(6):710-7. doi: 10.1002/jts.21868.

引用本文的文献

1
Executive function improvement in response to meta-cognitive training in chronic mTBI / PTSD.慢性创伤性脑损伤/创伤后应激障碍患者在接受元认知训练后执行功能的改善
Front Rehabil Sci. 2023 Jul 7;4:1189292. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1189292. eCollection 2023.
2
Acute influence of an adaptive sporting event on quality of life in veterans with disabilities.适应型体育赛事对残疾退役军人生活质量的急性影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 28;17(11):e0277909. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277909. eCollection 2022.
3
Leveraging institutional support for family caregivers to meet the health and vocational needs of persons with disabilities.

本文引用的文献

1
Computer-adaptive test to measure community reintegration of Veterans.用于测量退伍军人社区重新融入情况的计算机自适应测试。
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(4):557-66. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2011.04.0081.
2
Measurement of community reintegration in sample of severely wounded servicemembers.重伤军人样本中社区重新融入情况的测量。
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(2):89-102. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2010.04.0070.
3
Reintegration problems and treatment interests among Iraq and Afghanistan combat veterans receiving VA medical care.在接受 VA 医疗护理的伊拉克和阿富汗作战老兵中,重新融入社会的问题和治疗利益。
利用机构支持为家庭照顾者提供支持,以满足残疾人士的健康和职业需求。
Nurs Outlook. 2020 Mar-Apr;68(2):184-193. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2019.08.006. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
4
An Investigation of Exposure Control Methods With Variable-Length CAT Using the Partial Credit Model.使用部分计分模型对可变长度计算机自适应测试的暴露控制方法进行的调查。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2019 Nov;43(8):624-638. doi: 10.1177/0146621618824856. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
5
How do the outcomes of the DEKA Arm compare to conventional prostheses?DEKA义肢的效果与传统假肢相比如何?
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 17;13(1):e0191326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191326. eCollection 2018.
6
Evaluating Individual Change With the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL) Short Forms.使用神经疾病生活质量简表(Neuro-QoL)评估个体变化。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Apr;97(4):650-654.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.12.010. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
Psychiatr Serv. 2010 Jun;61(6):589-97. doi: 10.1176/ps.2010.61.6.589.
4
Development of CRIS: measure of community reintegration of injured service members.CRIS的发展:受伤军人社区重新融入的衡量标准。
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2009;46(4):469-80. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2008.07.0082.
5
Trends and risk factors for mental health diagnoses among Iraq and Afghanistan veterans using Department of Veterans Affairs health care, 2002-2008.2002年至2008年期间,使用退伍军人事务部医疗保健服务的伊拉克和阿富汗退伍军人心理健康诊断的趋势及风险因素。
Am J Public Health. 2009 Sep;99(9):1651-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.150284. Epub 2009 Jul 16.
6
A computer-adaptive disability instrument for lower extremity osteoarthritis research demonstrated promising breadth, precision, and reliability.一种用于下肢骨关节炎研究的计算机自适应残疾评估工具展现出了良好的广度、精准度和可靠性。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Aug;62(8):807-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.004. Epub 2009 Feb 12.
7
Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.组内相关系数:在评估评分者可靠性中的应用。
Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.86.2.420.
8
Using a temporal discounting paradigm to measure decision-making and impulsivity following traumatic brain injury: a pilot study.使用时间折扣范式测量创伤性脑损伤后的决策制定和冲动性:一项初步研究。
Brain Inj. 2008 Aug;22(9):715-21. doi: 10.1080/02699050802263027.
9
Traumatic brain injury during Operation Iraqi Freedom: findings from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Combat Trauma Registry.伊拉克自由行动期间的创伤性脑损伤:来自美国海军陆战队战斗创伤登记处的发现
J Neurosurg. 2008 May;108(5):950-7. doi: 10.3171/JNS/2008/108/5/0950.
10
Development and evaluation of a computer adaptive test for 'Anxiety' (Anxiety-CAT).“焦虑”计算机自适应测试(Anxiety-CAT)的开发与评估
Qual Life Res. 2007;16 Suppl 1:143-55. doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9191-7. Epub 2007 Mar 7.