Jette Alan M, McDonough Christine M, Haley Stephen M, Ni Pengsheng, Olarsch Sippy, Latham Nancy, Hambleton Ronald K, Felson David, Kim Young-Jo, Hunter David
Health & Disability Research Institute, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Aug;62(8):807-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.004. Epub 2009 Feb 12.
To develop and evaluate a prototype measure (OA-DISABILITY-CAT) for osteoarthritis research using item response theory (IRT) and computer-adaptive test (CAT) methodologies.
We constructed an item bank consisting of 33 activities commonly affected by lower extremity (LE) osteoarthritis. A sample of 323 adults with LE osteoarthritis reported their degree of limitation in performing everyday activities, and completed the Health Assessment Questionnaire-II (HAQ-II). We used confirmatory factor analyses to assess scale unidimensionality and IRT methods to calibrate the items and examine the fit of the data. Using CAT simulation analyses, we examined the performance of OA-DISABILITY-CATs of different lengths compared with the full-item bank and the HAQ-II.
One distinct disability domain was identified. The 10-item OA-DISABILITY-CAT demonstrated a high degree of accuracy compared with the full-item bank (r=0.99). The item bank and the HAQ-II scales covered a similar estimated scoring range. In terms of reliability, 95% of OA-DISABILITY reliability estimates were over 0.83 vs. 0.60 for the HAQ-II. Except at the highest scores, the 10-item OA-DISABILITY-CAT demonstrated superior precision to the HAQ-II.
The prototype OA-DISABILITY-CAT demonstrated promising measurement properties compared with the HAQ-II, and is recommended for use in LE osteoarthritis research.
运用项目反应理论(IRT)和计算机自适应测试(CAT)方法,开发并评估一种用于骨关节炎研究的原型测量工具(OA-DISABILITY-CAT)。
我们构建了一个包含33项常受下肢骨关节炎影响的活动的题库。323名患有下肢骨关节炎的成年人样本报告了他们在进行日常活动时的受限程度,并完成了健康评估问卷-II(HAQ-II)。我们使用验证性因素分析来评估量表的单维性,并使用IRT方法校准项目并检验数据的拟合度。通过CAT模拟分析,我们比较了不同长度的OA-DISABILITY-CAT与完整题库和HAQ-II的性能。
确定了一个独特的残疾领域。与完整题库相比,10项的OA-DISABILITY-CAT表现出高度的准确性(r = 0.99)。题库和HAQ-II量表涵盖了相似的估计得分范围。在信度方面,OA-DISABILITY信度估计的95%超过0.83,而HAQ-II为0.60。除了最高分数段,10项的OA-DISABILITY-CAT表现出比HAQ-II更高的精度。
与HAQ-II相比,原型OA-DISABILITY-CAT表现出了良好的测量属性,推荐用于下肢骨关节炎研究。