Suppr超能文献

EAU 指南:尿失禁的评估和非手术治疗。

EAU guidelines on assessment and nonsurgical management of urinary incontinence.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK.

出版信息

Eur Urol. 2012 Dec;62(6):1130-42. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.08.047. Epub 2012 Aug 31.

Abstract

CONTEXT

The previous European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines on urinary incontinence comprised a summary of sections of the 2009 International Consultation on Incontinence. A decision was made in 2010 to rewrite these guidelines based on an independent systematic review carried out by the EAU guidelines panel, using a sustainable methodology.

OBJECTIVE

We present a short version of the full guidelines on assessment, diagnosis, and nonsurgical treatment of urinary incontinence, with the aim of increasing their dissemination.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Evidence appraisal included a pragmatic review of existing systematic reviews and independent new literature searches, based on Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome questions. Appraisal of papers was carried out by an international panel of experts, who also collaborated on a series of consensus discussions, to develop concise structured evidence summaries and action-based recommendations using a modified Oxford system.

EVIDENCE SUMMARY

The full version of the guidelines is available online (http://www.uroweb.org/guidelines/online-guidelines/). The guidelines include algorithms that refer the reader back to the supporting evidence, and they are more immediately useable in daily clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

These new guidelines present an up-to-date summary of the available evidence, together with clear clinical algorithms and action-based recommendations based on the best available evidence. Where such evidence does not exist, they present a consensus of expert opinion.

摘要

背景

之前的欧洲泌尿外科学会(EAU)尿失禁指南包含了 2009 年国际尿失禁咨询的部分章节总结。2010 年,决定根据 EAU 指南小组进行的独立系统评价,使用可持续的方法重写这些指南。

目的

我们呈现了一份简短的完整指南,内容涵盖尿失禁的评估、诊断和非手术治疗,旨在增加其传播。

证据获取

证据评估包括对现有系统评价和独立新文献的务实审查,基于人群、干预、比较、结局问题。国际专家小组对论文进行了评估,他们还合作进行了一系列共识讨论,使用改良的牛津系统制定简洁的结构化证据摘要和基于行动的建议。

证据总结

指南的完整版本可在线获取(http://www.uroweb.org/guidelines/online-guidelines/)。指南包括将读者引导回支持证据的算法,它们在日常临床实践中更具即时可用性。

结论

这些新指南提供了现有证据的最新总结,以及基于最佳可用证据的明确临床算法和基于行动的建议。在没有此类证据的情况下,它们代表了专家意见的共识。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验