Sistac Ballarín J M, Gredilla Díaz E, Sáez Fernández A
Hospital Universitario Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, España; Sección de Docencia y Formación Continuada de la Sociedad Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación.
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2012 Mar;59(3):127-33. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2012.02.032. Epub 2012 May 3.
To determine the current situation of the tutors in our specialty as regards resident/tutor ratios, times they have available to develop their work, the training that they have received to perform their function, and whether this is recognised by official bodies, other than by their own hospital. Furthermore, to determine the teaching and research work taught to the residents through the sessions, as well as their participation in publications per year. To find out their opinion of the tutors as regards unifying training contents, whether or not they have objective tests on finishing their residency, and their willingness to take part in the project promoted by the Teaching Section of SEDAR to carry out a common minimum theoretical-practical programme throughout the whole of Spain.
A questionnaire with the aforementioned questions was sent to Anaesthesiology Teach Units through the different regional coordinators, during the years 2008-2010.
A total of 77/106 (72.6%) Teaching Units responded. The mean ratio of residents per tutor was 5.6±3.3. More than 60% of the tutors had not attended any training course or even how to join one in the two years of the study; 62.3% did not have specific time available to develop their role as tutors, and in 18.2%, their work was only recognised by health institutions. The number of teaching sessions for residents per year was 5.0±4.0 and the number of publications was 1.6±1.4. Almost all of them (98.7%) believe it was necessary to produce a programme that would ensure similar minimum theoretical-practical training plans and that on their own initiative had been carried out in 70% of Teaching Units, but without uniform criteria. Almost three-quarters (74%) had not presented any resident to the European Examination of Anaesthesia in the last few years, and 87% considered the system of evaluating residents as inadequate, with 79% in favour of having a final exam or test.
The tutor/resident ratio should according to that stipulated. Time needs to be set aside for teaching, separate from care work, and our tutors, in general, lack specific training courses, and these are very disparate. There is a general demand to have a training programme of common minimum theoretical-practical skills. It is considered that the current evaluation system is inadequate, but there is no unanimity in whether or not to have an exam at the end of the residency, although the European Examination could be the model to consider in this regard.
确定本专业导师的现状,包括住院医师与导师的比例、开展工作的可用时间、履行职责所接受的培训,以及除所在医院外是否得到官方机构认可。此外,确定通过课程向住院医师传授的教学和研究工作,以及他们每年参与发表论文的情况。了解他们对导师统一培训内容的看法,完成住院医师培训后是否有客观测试,以及他们参与西班牙麻醉与复苏学会教学部推动的在全西班牙开展共同最低理论 - 实践项目的意愿。
2008 - 2010年期间,通过不同地区协调员向麻醉学教学单位发送了包含上述问题的问卷。
共有77/106(72.6%)个教学单位回复。每位导师指导的住院医师平均比例为5.6±3.3。在研究的两年中,超过60%的导师未参加过任何培训课程,甚至不知道如何参加;62.3%的导师没有专门时间履行导师职责,18.2%的导师工作仅得到卫生机构认可。每年为住院医师安排的教学课程数量为5.0±4.0,发表论文数量为1.6±1.4。几乎所有人(98.7%)认为有必要制定一个确保类似最低理论 - 实践培训计划的方案,70%的教学单位已主动开展,但没有统一标准。近四分之三(74%)的单位在过去几年中没有派出住院医师参加欧洲麻醉学考试,87%的单位认为住院医师评估体系不完善,79%的单位赞成进行期末考试或测试。
导师与住院医师的比例应符合规定。需要留出与护理工作分开的教学时间,总体而言,我们的导师缺乏专门培训课程,且差异很大。普遍要求有一个共同最低理论 - 实践技能的培训项目。认为当前评估体系不完善,但对于住院医师培训结束时是否进行考试没有一致意见,尽管欧洲考试可作为这方面考虑的模式。