Department of Pharmacology, Daiichi College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tamagawa-cho, Minami-ku, Fukuoka, Japan.
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2012 Dec 18;47(5):890-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2012.08.016. Epub 2012 Sep 15.
This study compared the efficacy and skin permeability of nine topical preparations of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (ketoprofen, diclofenac, flurbiprofen, and piroxicam patches; and ketoprofen, diclofenac, piroxicam, niflumic acid, and ibuprofen gels) available in the European Union. The anti-inflammatory effect of these NSAID preparations was evaluated in rat models of acute inflammation (carrageenan or yeast treatment) and chronic inflammation (collagen or adjuvant treatment). Skin permeability of the preparations was evaluated in vitro using mouse skin. In rats with acute inflammation, both ketoprofen preparations significantly inhibited carrageenan-induced edema and yeast-induced hyperalgesia. Flurbiprofen and diclofenac preparations also showed a significant anti-inflammatory effect, but the ketoprofen products were the most potent among the four patch preparations and five gel preparations. With repeated application, the ketoprofen patch significantly decreased edema from day 3 in collagen-treated rats, while other preparations (ketoprofen gel, diclofenac patch, and diclofenac gel) decreased edema from day 7. In rats with adjuvant-induced arthritis, only the ketoprofen patch significantly decreased edema after 2 weeks of application. In the skin permeation study, the ketoprofen preparations showed higher skin permeability compared with the other NSAID preparations. These results suggested that ketoprofen preparations had the most potent anti-inflammatory and analgesic activity related to good skin permeability. Efficacy of the ketoprofen patch was comparable to or better than that of ketoprofen gel at a lower dose and frequency of administration. Ketoprofen products, especially the patch preparation, could be useful for treating inflammatory pain in diseases like osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.
本研究比较了欧盟市场上 9 种非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)(酮洛芬、双氯芬酸、氟比洛芬和吡罗昔康贴剂;酮洛芬、双氯芬酸、吡罗昔康、尼氟酸和布洛芬凝胶)的疗效和皮肤渗透性。这些 NSAID 制剂的抗炎作用在大鼠急性炎症(角叉菜胶或酵母处理)和慢性炎症(胶原或佐剂处理)模型中进行了评估。使用小鼠皮肤在体外评估制剂的皮肤渗透性。在急性炎症大鼠中,两种酮洛芬制剂均能显著抑制角叉菜胶诱导的水肿和酵母诱导的痛觉过敏。氟比洛芬和双氯芬酸制剂也表现出明显的抗炎作用,但酮洛芬制剂在 4 种贴剂制剂和 5 种凝胶制剂中最为有效。重复应用时,酮洛芬贴剂从第 3 天开始显著减轻胶原处理大鼠的水肿,而其他制剂(酮洛芬凝胶、双氯芬酸贴剂和双氯芬酸凝胶)从第 7 天开始减轻水肿。在佐剂诱导关节炎大鼠中,只有酮洛芬贴剂在应用 2 周后显著减轻水肿。在皮肤渗透研究中,酮洛芬制剂显示出比其他 NSAID 制剂更高的皮肤渗透性。这些结果表明,酮洛芬制剂具有最强的抗炎和镇痛活性,与良好的皮肤渗透性有关。在较低的剂量和给药频率下,酮洛芬贴剂的疗效可与酮洛芬凝胶相媲美甚至更好。酮洛芬产品,尤其是贴剂制剂,可用于治疗骨关节炎和类风湿关节炎等疾病引起的炎性疼痛。