Ashtown Food Research Centre, Teagasc, Ashtown, Dublin, Ireland.
Food Microbiol. 2012 Dec;32(2):325-31. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2012.07.008. Epub 2012 Aug 8.
The study examined and compared levels of aerial contamination in commercial beef and sheep plants at four sites, i.e. lairage, hide/fleece pulling, evisceration and chilling. Aerial contamination was determined by impaction and sedimentation onto Plate Count Agar to enumerate Total Viable Counts, MacConkey Agar to enumerate coliforms and Violate Red Bile Glucose Agar to enumerate Enterobacteriaceae. AS I cannot see any difference in the text here - I am not sure what the change is?. The levels of aerial contamination were similar at equivalent sites in beef and sheep plants, irrespective of the sampling method or the type of organisms recovered. Mean log counts recovered on each medium in the chillers were generally significantly lower (P < .05) than the corresponding mean log numbers recovered at the other three sites. The relationship between impaction (air) and sedimentation (surface) counts could be described by the surface to air ratio (SAR) which in this study had an R(2) of 0.77. Further studies in an experimental plant compared counts recovered from the neck of beef carcasses with aerial counts determined by impaction and sedimentation onto agar and irradiated meat pieces. A relationship between counts on beef carcasses and in the air could not be established, irrespective of the method used to compare counts.
该研究在四个地点(即待宰区、剥皮/去毛、屠宰和冷却区)检查和比较了商业牛肉和羊肉加工厂的空气污染物水平。通过撞击和沉降到平板计数琼脂上,对总活菌计数、麦康凯琼脂上的大肠菌群计数和 Violate Red Bile Glucose Agar 上的肠杆菌科计数来确定空气污染物。由于我在这里看不到文本有任何变化,所以我不确定有什么改动?在牛肉和羊肉加工厂的等效地点,空气污染物的水平相似,无论采样方法或回收的生物体类型如何。在冷却器中每种培养基上回收的平均对数计数通常明显低于(P <.05)其他三个地点的相应平均对数数。撞击(空气)和沉降(表面)计数之间的关系可以用表面到空气比(SAR)来描述,在本研究中,SAR 的 R(2)为 0.77。在一个实验工厂中的进一步研究比较了从牛肉胴体颈部回收的计数与通过撞击和沉降到琼脂上以及辐照肉块上确定的空气计数。无论使用何种方法进行计数比较,都无法确定牛肉胴体上的计数与空气中的计数之间的关系。