Yaghoubian Arezou, Galante Joseph, Kaji Amy, Reeves Mark, Melcher Marc, Salim Ali, Dolich Matthew, de Virgilio Christian
Department of Surgery, UCLA Medical Center, CA, USA.
Arch Surg. 2012 Sep;147(9):829-33. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2012.1676.
To determine the rates and predictors of remediation and attrition among general surgery residents.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Eleven-year retrospective analysis of 348 categorical general surgery residents at 6 West Coast programs.
Rates and predictors of remediation and attrition.
Three hundred forty-eight categorical general surgery residents were included. One hundred seven residents (31%) required remediation, of which 27 were remediated more than once. Fifty-five residents (15.8%) left their programs, although only 2 were owing to failed remediation. Remediation was not a predictor of attrition (20% attrition for those remediated vs 15% who were not [P = .40]). Remediation was most frequently initiated owing to a deficiency in medical knowledge (74%). Remediation consisted of monthly meetings with faculty (79%), reading assignments (72%), required conferences (27%), therapy (12%), and repeating a clinical year (6.5%). On univariate analysis, predictors of remediation included receiving honors in the third-year surgery clerkship, United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) step 1 and/or step 2, and American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination scores at postgraduate years 1 through 4. On multivariable regression analysis, remediation was associated with receiving honors in surgery (odds ratio, 1.9; P = .01) and USMLE step 1 score (odds ratio, 0.9; P = .02). On univariate analysis, the only predictor of attrition was the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination score at the postgraduate year 3 level (P = .04).
Almost one third of categorical general surgery residents required remediation during residency, which was most often owing to medical knowledge deficits. Lower USMLE step 1 scores were predictors of the need for remediation. Most remediated residents successfully completed the program. Given the high rates of remediation and the increased educational burden on clinical faculty, medical schools need to focus on better preparing students to enter surgical residency.
确定普通外科住院医师中补救教育和退出培训的比例及预测因素。
设计、地点和参与者:对西海岸6个项目的348名普通外科住院医师进行为期11年的回顾性分析。
补救教育和退出培训的比例及预测因素。
纳入348名普通外科住院医师。107名住院医师(31%)需要补救教育,其中27名接受了不止一次补救。55名住院医师(15.8%)退出培训项目,不过仅有2名是因为补救教育未通过。补救教育并非退出培训的预测因素(接受补救教育者的退出率为20%,未接受补救教育者为15%[P = 0.40])。补救教育最常见的启动原因是医学知识不足(74%)。补救教育包括每月与教员会面(79%)、阅读作业(72%)、必修会议(27%)、辅导(12%)以及重复一个临床学年(6.5%)。单因素分析显示,补救教育的预测因素包括在三年级外科实习中获得荣誉、美国医师执照考试(USMLE)第1步和/或第2步成绩,以及研究生第1至4年的美国外科委员会住院医师培训考试成绩。多变量回归分析显示,补救教育与在外科实习中获得荣誉(比值比,1.9;P = 0.01)和USMLE第1步成绩(比值比,0.9;P = 0.02)相关。单因素分析显示,退出培训的唯一预测因素是研究生第3年的美国外科委员会住院医师培训考试成绩(P = 0.04)。
几乎三分之一的普通外科住院医师在住院医师培训期间需要补救教育,这最常见的原因是医学知识欠缺。USMLE第1步成绩较低是需要补救教育的预测因素。大多数接受补救教育的住院医师成功完成了培训项目。鉴于补救教育比例较高以及临床教员的教育负担加重,医学院校需要专注于更好地培养学生进入外科住院医师培训。