Rocky Mountain Research Station, US Forest Service, Missoula, Montana 59807, USA.
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2013 Apr;9(2):329-42. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1365. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
The financial, socioeconomic, and ecological impacts of wildfire continue to challenge federal land management agencies in the United States. In recent years, policymakers and managers have increasingly turned to the field of risk analysis to better manage wildfires and to mitigate losses to highly valued resources and assets (HVRAs). Assessing wildfire risk entails the interaction of multiple components, including integrating wildfire simulation outputs with geospatial identification of HVRAs and the characterization of fire effects to HVRAs. We present an integrated and systematic risk assessment framework that entails 3 primary analytical components: 1) stochastic wildfire simulation and burn probability modeling to characterize wildfire hazard, 2) expert-based modeling to characterize fire effects, and 3) multicriteria decision analysis to characterize preference structures across at-risk HVRAs. We demonstrate application of this framework for a wildfire risk assessment performed on the Little Belts Assessment Area within the Lewis and Clark National Forest in Montana, United States. We devote particular attention to our approach to eliciting and encapsulating expert judgment, in which we: 1) adhered to a structured process for using expert judgment in ecological risk assessment, 2) used as our expert base local resource scientists and fire/fuels specialists who have a direct connection to the specific landscape and HVRAs in question, and 3) introduced multivariate response functions to characterize fire effects to HVRAs that consider biophysical variables beyond fire behavior. We anticipate that this work will further the state of wildfire risk science and will lead to additional application of risk assessment to inform land management planning.
野火对财务、社会经济和生态的影响继续给美国联邦土地管理机构带来挑战。近年来,政策制定者和管理者越来越多地转向风险分析领域,以更好地管理野火,并减轻对高价值资源和资产(HVRAs)的损失。评估野火风险需要多个组件的相互作用,包括将野火模拟输出与 HVRAs 的地理空间识别以及火灾对 HVRAs 的影响特征相结合。我们提出了一个综合和系统的风险评估框架,包括 3 个主要分析组件:1)随机野火模拟和燃烧概率建模以描述野火危害,2)基于专家的建模以描述火灾影响,以及 3)多准则决策分析以描述高风险 HVRAs 中的偏好结构。我们在美国蒙大拿州刘易斯和克拉克国家森林的小贝尔茨评估区演示了该框架在野火风险评估中的应用。我们特别关注我们在启发和封装专家判断方面的方法,其中包括:1)在生态风险评估中使用专家判断时遵循结构化流程,2)使用与特定景观和 HVRAs 有直接联系的当地资源科学家和火灾/燃料专家作为我们的专家基础,以及 3)引入多元响应函数来描述对 HVRAs 的火灾影响,这些函数考虑了火灾行为以外的生物物理变量。我们预计这项工作将推动野火风险科学的发展,并导致更多地将风险评估应用于土地管理规划。