School of Economics, University of Cape Town, South Africa.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2013 Apr;15(4):767-76. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nts170. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
Article 6 of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control commits Parties to use tax and price policies to reduce tobacco use, whereas Article 15 commits Parties to implement measures to eliminate the illicit trade in tobacco products. This paper identifies research gaps/needs, especially in low- and middle-income countries, which, if adequately addressed, would help in implementing Articles 6 and 15.
Based on a recent comprehensive review on the impact of tax and price on tobacco consumption and a summary of reviews and narratives about the illicit tobacco market, research gaps are identified.
Countries have highly diverse research needs, depending on the stage of the tobacco epidemic, previous research and data availability, and making a ranking of research needs infeasible. Broad issues for further research are the following: (1) monitoring tobacco consumption, prices, and taxes, (2) assessing the effectiveness of the tax structure in generating revenue and reducing tobacco use, (3) strengthening the tax administration system in order to reduce tax evasion and tax avoidance, (4) improving our understanding of the political economy of tobacco tax policy, and (5) employing a multidisciplinary approach to assessing the magnitude of illicit tobacco trade.
At a technical level, the case for increasing excise taxes to improve public health and increase government revenue is easily made, but the political and policy environment is often not supportive. In order to effectively impact policy, the required approach would typically make use of rigorous economic techniques, and be cognizant of the political economy of raising excise taxes.
《烟草控制框架公约》第 6 条要求缔约方利用税收和价格政策来减少烟草使用,第 15 条则要求缔约方实施措施来消除烟草制品的非法贸易。本文确定了研究空白/需求,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家,如果能充分解决这些问题,将有助于实施第 6 条和第 15 条。
本文基于最近对税收和价格对烟草消费影响的全面审查,以及对非法烟草市场的审查和叙述的总结,确定了研究空白。
各国的研究需求高度多样化,取决于烟草流行的阶段、以前的研究和数据的可用性,对研究需求进行排名是不可行的。进一步研究的广泛问题包括:(1)监测烟草消费、价格和税收,(2)评估税收结构在产生收入和减少烟草使用方面的有效性,(3)加强税收管理系统以减少逃税和避税,(4)增进对烟草税收政策的政治经济学的理解,(5)采用多学科方法来评估非法烟草贸易的规模。
在技术层面上,提高消费税以改善公共卫生和增加政府收入的理由很充分,但政治和政策环境往往不支持。为了有效地影响政策,所需的方法通常将利用严格的经济技术,并认识到提高消费税的政治经济学。