• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在存在非法卷烟市场的情况下提高消费税:2011年巴西烟草税改革

Increasing excise taxes in the presence of an illegal cigarette market: the 2011 Brazil tobacco tax reform.

作者信息

Iglesias Roberto Magno

机构信息

Center for Integration and Development Studies (CINDES), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

出版信息

Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2016 Oct;40(4):243-249.

PMID:28001200
Abstract

The Brazilian cigarette excise tax reform of 2011 increased tax rates significantly in the presence of a high proportion of illegal and cheap cigarettes contributing to total consumption. Prior to 2011, tobacco tax policy in Brazil had reduced excise tax share on consumer prices, for fear of smuggling. This report examines two hypotheses explaining why tax authorities changed direction. The first is related to lack of concern regarding smuggling in tobacco industry pricing behavior before 2011 (rather than reducing prices following tax reduction, legal companies increased net of tax prices above inflation and key costs). The second hypothesis regards inconsistent industry assessments of the size of the illicit market, which ultimately undermined the credibility of the industry with tax authorities. The author concludes that the 2011 reform was designed to revert the weakness of previous policies, and did indeed succeed. The post-2011 experience in Brazil indicates that increased cigarette excise taxes can increase government revenues and reduce smoking prevalence and consumption despite widespread smuggling of tobacco products.

摘要

2011年巴西香烟消费税改革大幅提高了税率,当时非法且低价香烟在总消费量中占比很高。2011年之前,由于担心走私问题,巴西的烟草税收政策降低了消费税在消费者价格中所占的份额。本报告探讨了两个假说,以解释税务机关为何改变方向。第一个假说与2011年之前税务机关对烟草行业定价行为中的走私问题缺乏关注有关(合法公司并未在减税之后降低价格,而是将税后价格提高到高于通胀和关键成本的水平)。第二个假说认为,行业对非法市场规模的评估不一致,最终损害了行业在税务机关眼中的可信度。作者得出结论,2011年的改革旨在扭转先前政策的弱点,并且确实取得了成功。巴西2011年之后的经验表明,尽管烟草制品普遍存在走私现象,但提高香烟消费税仍可增加政府收入,并降低吸烟率和消费量。

相似文献

1
Increasing excise taxes in the presence of an illegal cigarette market: the 2011 Brazil tobacco tax reform.在存在非法卷烟市场的情况下提高消费税:2011年巴西烟草税改革
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2016 Oct;40(4):243-249.
2
Change in tobacco excise policy in Bulgaria: the role of tobacco industry lobbying and smuggling.保加利亚烟草消费税政策的变化:烟草业游说和走私的作用。
Tob Control. 2014 May;23(e1):e75-84. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050600. Epub 2012 Nov 10.
3
Measuring changes in the illicit cigarette market using government revenue data: the example of South Africa.利用政府税收数据衡量非法香烟市场的变化:以南非为例。
Tob Control. 2014 May;23(e1):e69-74. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051178. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
4
Does smuggling negate the impact of a tobacco tax increase?走私会抵消提高烟草税的影响吗?
Tob Control. 2016 May;25(3):361-2. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052310. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
5
Understanding tobacco industry pricing strategy and whether it undermines tobacco tax policy: the example of the UK cigarette market.理解烟草业的定价策略及其是否破坏烟草税收政策:以英国卷烟市场为例。
Addiction. 2013 Jul;108(7):1317-26. doi: 10.1111/add.12159. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
6
Tobacco excise tax increase and illicit cigarette consumption: evidence from Vietnam.提高烟草消费税与非法香烟消费:来自越南的证据。
Tob Control. 2020 Oct;29(Suppl 4):s275-s280. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055301. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
7
Tobacco tax and the illicit trade in tobacco products in New Zealand.新西兰的烟草税与烟草制品非法贸易
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2015 Apr;39(2):116-20. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12389.
8
Raising Tobacco Taxes: The Philippine Experience.提高烟草税:菲律宾的经验。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2020 Jul 1;21(S1):27-31. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.S1.27.
9
Estimating the size of illicit tobacco consumption in Brazil: findings from the global adult tobacco survey.估算巴西非法烟草消费规模:全球成人烟草调查结果
Tob Control. 2017 Jan;26(1):53-59. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052465. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
10
[Cigarette prices, tobacco taxes and the proportion of contraband cigarettes in Germany].[德国的香烟价格、烟草税及走私香烟比例]
Gesundheitswesen. 2013 Jun;75(6):e95-100. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1321776. Epub 2012 Aug 29.

引用本文的文献

1
The cigarette market in Brazil: new evidence on illicit practices from the 2019 National Health Survey.巴西的香烟市场:2019 年全国健康调查中关于非法行为的新证据。
Tob Control. 2024 Jun 4;33(Suppl 2):s128-s134. doi: 10.1136/tc-2022-057847.
2
Comparing taxes as a percentage of sugar-sweetened beverage prices in Latin America and the Caribbean.比较拉丁美洲和加勒比地区税收占含糖饮料价格的百分比。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022 Jul;11:None. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2022.100257.
3
The WHO FCTC's lessons for addressing the commercial determinants of health.
世卫组织烟草控制框架公约应对健康决定因素的商业问题的经验教训。
Health Promot Int. 2021 Dec 13;36(Supplement_1):i39-i52. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daab143.
4
Sin taxes and their effect on consumption, revenue generation and health improvement: a systematic literature review in Latin America.罪恶税及其对消费、创收和健康改善的影响:拉丁美洲的系统文献综述
Health Policy Plan. 2021 Jun 3;36(5):790-810. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaa168.
5
Trends in Prevalence of Cigarette Smoking in Brazil: 2006-2019.巴西吸烟流行趋势:2006-2019 年。
Am J Public Health. 2021 Apr;111(4):730-738. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.306102. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
6
Health Taxes on Tobacco, Alcohol, Food and Drinks in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review of Policy Content, Actors, Process and Context.中低收入国家的烟草、酒精、食品和饮料健康税:政策内容、行为者、过程和背景的范围综述。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Apr 1;11(4):414-428. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.170.
7
Generating revenue by raising tobacco taxes in Latin America and the Caribbean.通过提高拉丁美洲和加勒比地区的烟草税来创收。
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2017 Dec 12;41:e151. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2017.151. eCollection 2017.
8
Trends in Illicit Cigarette Use in Brazil Estimated From Legal Sales, 2012-2016.2012-2016 年巴西通过合法销售估算的非法香烟使用趋势。
Am J Public Health. 2018 Feb;108(2):265-269. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304117. Epub 2017 Dec 21.