Valenti School of Communication, University of Houston, Texas, USA.
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2012 Oct;26(10):597-613. doi: 10.1089/apc.2012.0151. Epub 2012 Sep 18.
The current study was a meta-analysis of the efficacy of educational, psychosocial or behavioral interventions that were conducted in China to promote HIV/sexual risk reduction. A total of 26 intervention studies qualified for the meta-analysis. Outcome variables for which effect sizes were calculated included condom use with different types of sexual partners, HIV/AIDS knowledge, condom use knowledge, intentions of condom use, condom use self-efficacy, and others. Mean weighted effect sizes were calculated for each outcome measure across reviewed studies; effect size for each outcome measure was weighted by their inverse variance; fixed effects and random effects meta-analytic procedures were used. The Q statistic was used to examine whether the effect sizes were homogeneous in nature and moderating analysis (i.e., the Q(b) statistic) was used to compare the effect sizes of intervention studies that were different in a number of categorical variables. The reviewed interventions were successful in improving HIV knowledge (d=0.706), condom use knowledge (d=0.620), attitudes toward people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA; d=0.625) and in increasing condom use with regular partners (d=0.477), condom use with casual partners (d=0.444), general condom use (d=0.408), and condom use self-efficacy (d=0.584) among target audiences. In addition, moderating analyses on three most examined variables, including HIV knowledge, condom use, and attitudes toward PLWHA, demonstrated that interventions that reported the conduction of formative research and process evaluation, that were peer-led, and that included only one follow-up were more likely to report a positive impact on condom use behavior among target audiences (p<0.001), HIV knowledge (p<0.001), or attitudes toward PLWHA (p<0.001).
本研究是对在中国开展的以促进 HIV/性行为风险降低为目的的教育、心理社会或行为干预措施的疗效进行的荟萃分析。共有 26 项干预研究符合荟萃分析的条件。计算了效应量的结果变量包括与不同类型性伴侣使用安全套、艾滋病病毒/艾滋病知识、安全套使用知识、使用安全套的意愿、使用安全套的自我效能感等。对综述研究中的每一个结果测量指标计算了加权平均效应量;对每一个结果测量指标的效应量按其倒数方差加权;使用固定效应和随机效应荟萃分析程序。Q 统计量用于检验效应量是否具有同质性,调节分析(即 Q(b)统计量)用于比较在许多分类变量上不同的干预研究的效应量。综述中的干预措施在提高艾滋病病毒知识(d=0.706)、安全套使用知识(d=0.620)、对艾滋病病毒感染者/艾滋病患者(PLWHA)的态度(d=0.625)以及增加与固定性伴侣(d=0.477)、随意性伴侣(d=0.444)、一般性安全套使用(d=0.408)和安全套使用自我效能感(d=0.584)方面取得了成功。此外,对三个最受关注的变量(艾滋病病毒知识、安全套使用和对 PLWHA 的态度)的调节分析表明,报告开展形成性研究和过程评估、以同伴为基础且仅进行一次随访的干预措施更有可能报告对目标受众的安全套使用行为(p<0.001)、艾滋病病毒知识(p<0.001)或对 PLWHA 的态度(p<0.001)产生积极影响。