• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[电视胸腔镜辅助食管癌切除术的安全性评估]

[Evaluation of safety of video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma].

作者信息

Wang Hao, Tan Li-jie, Li Jing-pei, Shen Ya-xing, Zhang Yi, Feng Ming-xiang, Wang Qun

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Sep;15(9):926-9.

PMID:22990925
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the safety of video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma.

METHODS

From January 2005 to March 2012, 260 patients with esophageal carcinoma received thoracoscopic esophagectomy (TE group), while 322 patients underwent conventional open esophagectomy (OE group). Operative procedures, perioperative complications, reoperation, readmission to intensive care unit (ICU), and perioperative mortality were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Compared with OE group, TE group possessed less thoracic operative time [(105±30) min vs. (112±41) min, P=0.000], less blood loss [(95±48) ml vs. (107±44) ml, P=0.002], shorter postoperative hospital stay [(14.3±7.5) d vs. (16.9±9.5) d, P=0.000] and more lymph node harvest from thorax [(13.5±5.0) vs. (11.6±4.7), P=0.000]. The total perioperative complication rate was lower in TE group than that of OE group (34.6% vs. 45.0%, P=0.011), as well as perioperative mortality (0.8% vs. 3.4%, P=0.032). Lower rate of readmission to ICU (5.4% vs. 10.6%, P=0.024) was found in the TE group as compared to the OE group, while the reoperation rate was comparable (1.5% vs. 2.5%, P=0.425).

CONCLUSION

Thoracoscopic esophagectomy is advantageous than open procedure in terms of surgical safety.

摘要

目的

探讨电视胸腔镜辅助食管癌切除术的安全性。

方法

2005年1月至2012年3月,260例食管癌患者接受了胸腔镜食管癌切除术(TE组),而322例患者接受了传统开放性食管癌切除术(OE组)。比较两组的手术操作、围手术期并发症、再次手术、重症监护病房(ICU)再入院情况及围手术期死亡率。

结果

与OE组相比,TE组的胸腔手术时间更短[(105±30)分钟对(112±41)分钟,P = 0.000],失血量更少[(95±48)毫升对(107±44)毫升,P = 0.002],术后住院时间更短[(14.3±7.5)天对(16.9±9.5)天,P = 0.000],胸腔淋巴结清扫数量更多[(13.5±5.0)对(11.6±4.7),P = 0.000]。TE组的围手术期总并发症发生率低于OE组(34.

相似文献

1
[Evaluation of safety of video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma].[电视胸腔镜辅助食管癌切除术的安全性评估]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Sep;15(9):926-9.
2
[Video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma and gastro-esophageal anastomosis in thoracic cavity: analysis of 60 cases].[电视胸腔镜辅助食管癌切除术及胸腔内胃食管吻合术:60例分析]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Apr;51(4):354-7.
3
[Application of artificial pneumothorax in semi-prone position to the video-assisted thoracic surgery of esophageal carcinoma].人工气胸在半卧位应用于食管癌电视胸腔镜手术
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2012 Oct;34(10):785-9. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2012.10.014.
4
[Analysis of learning process of video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal carcinoma].[胸段食管癌电视辅助微创食管切除术学习过程分析]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Sep;15(9):918-21.
5
[Comparative study of perioperative complications and lymphadenectomy between minimally invasive esophagectomy and open procedure].[微创食管切除术与开放手术围手术期并发症及淋巴结清扫的比较研究]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Sep;15(9):922-5.
6
[Feasibility and safety of radical mediastinal lymphadenectomy in thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer].[胸腔镜食管癌根治术中纵隔淋巴结清扫的可行性与安全性]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2012 Nov;34(11):855-9. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2012.11.013.
7
Initial institutional experience with thoracoscopic assisted esophagectomy.胸腔镜辅助食管切除术的初步机构经验。
Am Surg. 2010 Jul;76(7):735-40.
8
[Video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy in esophageal carcinoma].[电视辅助胸腔镜食管癌切除术]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2008 Jan;11(1):24-7.
9
Three-dimensional vs two-dimensional video assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer.三维与二维电视辅助胸腔镜食管癌切除术治疗食管癌患者的对比
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Oct 7;21(37):10675-82. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i37.10675.
10
The use of a tailored surgical technique for minimally invasive esophagectomy.微创食管切除术的个体化手术技术的应用。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 May;143(5):1125-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.01.071.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical analysis of tubular stapler-assisted nested anastomosis in the prevention of postoperative esophageal cancer complications.管状吻合器辅助套入式吻合术预防食管癌术后并发症的临床分析
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2023 Apr 29;14(2):544-553. doi: 10.21037/jgo-23-166. Epub 2023 Apr 14.
2
Comparison of the outcomes between thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy via retrosternal and prevertebral lifting paths by the same surgeon.同一术者经胸骨后和椎前路径行胸腔镜和腹腔镜食管切除术的结局比较。
World J Surg Oncol. 2017 Aug 30;15(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12957-017-1219-z.
3
Minimally invasive oesophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.
微创食管切除术与开放食管切除术治疗可切除食管癌的Meta分析
World J Surg Oncol. 2016 Dec 8;14(1):304. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-1062-7.
4
Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in the People's Republic of China: an overview.中国微创食管癌切除术:概述。
Onco Targets Ther. 2013;6:119-24. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S40667. Epub 2013 Mar 3.